Page 1 of 1

Talks on Direct Flights Between Russia and Sihanoukville.

Posted: Sun May 29, 2016 9:32 pm
by CEOCambodiaNews
Good news!

Sihanoukville is top choice for Russia flight plan

Tue, 24 May 2016
Cheng Sokhorng

Regularly scheduled direct flights between Cambodia and Russia proposed by Prime Minister HE last week in Moscow might land in the coastal town of Sihanoukville, an official said yesterday.

Cambodia has already signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) for direct flights in 2015, and last week’s talks were hoped to speed up implementation, Tourism Minister Thong Khon said.

“In the meeting [last week], the Russian prime minister pushed for a direct flight from Russia to Sihanoukville,” he said, adding that Dmitry Medvedev expressed that a seaside destination would be the most popular option.

Khon added that participants of the meeting also worked on finalising a travel visa sub-decree that would allow Russians to enter for one to three years.

While the visit lacked concrete results, Khon hopes the deals will be finalised soon, especially as Russia tourist arrivals fell by 17.6 per cent during the first quarter of this year.

The numbers fell from 24,000 to 19,842 compared to the same time last year. However, Russians are still ranked as Sihanoukville’s second highest visitor, following the Chinese...
http://www.phnompenhpost.com/business/s ... light-plan

Re: Talks on Direct Flights Between Russia and Sihanoukville.

Posted: Sun May 29, 2016 10:05 pm
by rozzieoz
Shitsville + way too many!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Talks on Direct Flights Between Russia and Sihanoukville.

Posted: Mon May 30, 2016 6:50 am
by Duncan
Are we talking about long haul 747 's landing in Rushitsville. I don't think the airport landing strip is up to that.

Re: Talks on Direct Flights Between Russia and Sihanoukville.

Posted: Mon May 30, 2016 8:07 am
by Barang_doa_slae
Duncan wrote:Are we talking about long haul 747 's landing in Rushitsville. I don't think the airport landing strip is up to that.
And you would be mistaken as it it the longest runaway in the country

Re: Talks on Direct Flights Between Russia and Sihanoukville.

Posted: Mon May 30, 2016 8:14 am
by kiwiincambodia
Barang_doa_slae wrote:
Duncan wrote:Are we talking about long haul 747 's landing in Rushitsville. I don't think the airport landing strip is up to that.
And you would be mistaken as it it the longest runaway in the country
Isn't the one at the defunct Kampong Chhannang airport longer?

Re: Talks on Direct Flights Between Russia and Sihanoukville.

Posted: Mon May 30, 2016 8:19 am
by bolueeleh
747 needs abt 6000+ ft of runway for landing but the killer is not the landing, is takeoff

Re: Talks on Direct Flights Between Russia and Sihanoukville.

Posted: Mon May 30, 2016 11:58 am
by Duncan
Barang_doa_slae wrote:
Duncan wrote:Are we talking about long haul 747 's landing in Rushitsville. I don't think the airport landing strip is up to that.
And you would be mistaken as it it the longest runaway in the country
Being the longest does not mean much. It's the ability of the tarmac to take the pounding of a [ 747 ? ] planes weight on landing. I was told several years ago when they were studying the airport for upgrading, that this airport runway is like a skin on a rice pudding. When a heavy plane lands the landing strip under the wheels sinks down several inches and rises again after the plane moves forward. The landing strip can only take so many hard landings before having to be resurfaced again. Their alternative was to displace some of the liquid under the strip by pumping under high pressure a substance called ? [ sorry cannot remember the name ]

Re: Talks on Direct Flights Between Russia and Sihanoukville.

Posted: Mon May 30, 2016 12:41 pm
by SinnSisamouth
sodium bentonite?

Re: Talks on Direct Flights Between Russia and Sihanoukville.

Posted: Mon May 30, 2016 12:47 pm
by Barang_doa_slae
Duncan wrote:
Barang_doa_slae wrote:
Duncan wrote:Are we talking about long haul 747 's landing in Rushitsville. I don't think the airport landing strip is up to that.
And you would be mistaken as it it the longest runaway in the country
Being the longest does not mean much. It's the ability of the tarmac to take the pounding of a [ 747 ? ] planes weight on landing. I was told several years ago when they were studying the airport for upgrading, that this airport runway is like a skin on a rice pudding. When a heavy plane lands the landing strip under the wheels sinks down several inches and rises again after the plane moves forward. The landing strip can only take so many hard landings before having to be resurfaced again. Their alternative was to displace some of the liquid under the strip by pumping under high pressure a substance called ? [ sorry cannot remember the name ]
Cams invested 30 millions $ on the airport runaway and flight related equipment in the past 5 years...