Page 1 of 1
Porn is (or is not) for losers
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 10:55 am
by mammothboy2
http://www.salon.com/2016/09/02/porn-is ... g-scandal/
The old British term concerned material "likely to corrupt and deprave" and the internet is well-supplied with
corrupting and likely-to-deprave material (totally free)
Re: Porn is (or is not) for losers
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 11:04 am
by hanno
From a woman that built her career on showing her tits......
NSFW
Re: Porn is (or is not) for losers
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 12:09 pm
by Bertros
I'd hit that.
just sayin'
cheers
Bertros
Re: Porn is (or is not) for losers
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 12:32 pm
by bolueeleh
Bertros wrote:I'd hit that. just sayin' cheers Bertros
you and 11million men, 10 years ago, btw if u hit that it probably would break, the bag is brittle after so many years
Re: Porn is (or is not) for losers
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 2:17 pm
by Jamie_Lambo
what about her video with Tommy Lee on that boat the slut
Re: Porn is (or is not) for losers
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 2:19 pm
by Duncan
hanno wrote:From a woman that built her career on showing her tits......
NSFW
Yea, me and Pam had a fling together.
