Philippines wins South China Sea case against China.

Yeah, that place out 'there'. Anything not really Cambodia related should go here.
User avatar
IraHayes
Expatriate
Posts: 988
Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 7:38 am
Reputation: 424
Marshall Islands

Re: Philippines wins South China Sea case against China.

Post by IraHayes » Fri Jun 28, 2019 6:50 pm

Lets not forget Xi stated to Obama.. in 2012 i think,that "we have no plans to militarize the South China Sea."
.oh and some sea related court of arbitration in the Hague, (they decide all international disputes about sea borders etc), declared a few years ago that all the chinese claims to the SC Sea were invalid.... so china does what it always does with decisions it doesn't like... it ignores the

China has beef with Japan and Taiwan.... both have mutual defense treaties with the USA...... booooooom in my life time i think
User avatar
clutchcargo
Expatriate
Posts: 2676
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2018 3:09 pm
Reputation: 1188
Cambodia

Re: Philippines wins South China Sea case against China.

Post by clutchcargo » Tue Jul 09, 2019 2:30 pm

Maybe he would like a return of a US navy base at Subic.... :stir:

Firebrand Philippine president pushes the US to send the entire 7th Fleet into the South China Sea

Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, a strongman leader known for his rough-and-tumble rhetoric, dared the US on Monday to send the entire 7th Fleet, roughly 70 to 80 ships and submarines, into the South China Sea to drive out the Chinese military.

Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte dared the US on Monday to send the entire US 7th Fleet into the South China Sea to confront China if it really wants to drive Chinese forces from the disputed waterway.

His comments follow another speech, in which he accused the US of “egging on” the Philippines and using his country as bait.
Duterte has expressed doubt about America’s willingness to defend the Philippines, while his defence secretary has warned that the country’s mutual defence pact with the US could draw it into an unwanted war.

The latest rhetoric from the firebrand leader appears to be a message to the US, as well as those in the Philippines who have been critical of Duterte’s hesitancy to stand up to China.


Full story: https://www.businessinsider.com.au/dute ... sea-2019-7
icetiger81
Expatriate
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2018 3:11 pm
Reputation: 8
United States of America

Re: Philippines wins South China Sea case against China.

Post by icetiger81 » Sun Aug 11, 2019 7:43 am

Send the whole fleet, let Fat Tony take care of all the ships and guys while they are out there!
User avatar
CEOCambodiaNews
Expatriate
Posts: 28009
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 5:13 am
Reputation: 1261
Location: CEO Newsroom in Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Contact:
Cambodia

Re: Philippines wins South China Sea case against China.

Post by CEOCambodiaNews » Sun Nov 03, 2019 12:09 am

South China Sea: The Disputes and Southeast Asia’s Culture of International Law
Disputes in the South China Sea are not as complicated as they may seem.
By Pham Ngoc Minh Trang
October 22, 2019
Most observers usually look at the South China Sea disputes with pessimistic eyes. After capturing the attention of the world in 2009, when China for the first time officially introduced the nine-dash-line map, the conflicts in the region has continued to grow, tensions between the interested parties increasing. Furthering tensions, China ignored the judgment of an international tribunal in a 2016 suit against Beijing’s expansive claims. Thereafter, some observers have claimed that the disputes are too complicated to settle by law. But such pessimism ignores the fact that Southeast Asian countries have a culture of heeding international law. Whether judging from a realist lens or not, the law remains a useful tool for small countries to protect their interests.

Not So Complicated

From a legal perspective, disputes in the South China Sea are not as complicated as they may seem. There are two reasons for that statement.

First, all the claimants in the South China Sea – Brunei, China, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Vietnam – are parties to the two most important legal mechanisms dealing with multilateral disputes: the United Nations Charter (UN Charter) and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Under the regimes of these conventions, state parties have the obligation to settle their disputes by peaceful means, such as negotiation, regional arrangements, international arbitration, or courts/tribunals. Unlike the UN Charter, UNCLOS goes a step further and prescribed detailed methods of solving conflicts at sea for its parties in Chapter XV. In general, the consent of states is placed at the center of all dispute settlement mechanisms. However, UNCLOS particularly opens a chance for a state party individually to bring its conflict with another state before an international court or arbitration when it comes to certain types of disputes. These are called compulsory procedures, entailing binding decisions in section 2 of chapter XV of UNCLOS. When a state signed and ratified the Convention, it is understood that it has agreed with this settlement means in advance. This was the strategy the Philippines employed in its litigation against China in the South China Sea arbitration.

The second reason is that the whole situation in the South China Sea can be classified into specific legal categories, which could be settled separately by law.

The first category is related to conflicting claims of sovereignty over offshore maritime features. China and Vietnam claim sovereignty over all the features in the Paracels. For the Spratlys, the claimants include China, Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines and Vietnam.

The second category concerns normal maritime boundary demarcation exercises of littoral countries. Coastal states usually have maritime zones overlapping with their opposite and/or adjacent neighbors, and so do the claimants in the South China Sea. For example, Vietnam and Malaysia have overlapping exclusive economic zones (EEZ) and continental shelves, or Brunei when extending its EEZ and continental shelf has recognized the future delimitation of boundaries with neighbors in the future. And there is China, which claims a maritime zone comprising 80 percent of the South China Sea within the infamous nine-dash-line. This claim, however, was rejected by the arbitral tribunal in the case between the Philippines and China in 2016.

https://thediplomat.com/2019/10/south-c ... ional-law/
Cambodia Expats Online: Bringing you breaking news from Cambodia before you read it anywhere else!

Have a story or an anonymous news tip for CEO? Need advertising? CONTACT US

Cambodia Expats Online is the most popular community in the country. JOIN TODAY

Follow CEO on social media:

Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Google+
Instagram
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 153 guests