128+ Dead After Shooting at Petit Cambodge Restaurant 100 Hostages Taken and Bombing at Stade de France in Paris, France
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 2653
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 11:46 pm
- Reputation: 12
Re: 128+ Dead After Shooting at Petit Cambodge Restaurant 100 Hostages Taken and Bombing at Stade de France in Paris, Fr
I've read some news and rumor too.
កុំស្លាប់ដូចពស់ កុំរស់ដូចកង្កែប
Re: 128+ Dead After Shooting at Petit Cambodge Restaurant 100 Hostages Taken and Bombing at Stade de France in Paris, Fr
Jamie_Lambo wrote:you really dont have a clue and have no research behind your statements, i see your education comes from Fox news.... maybe you should do some research about where ISIS/Al Qaeda/Taliban came from, what allowed them to come into such power, who funded them and created them initially, you have a lot to learn,Tits Mcgee wrote:^Don't listen to that punch-drunk moron with the child's perpsective. Google "ISIS killing" and look at the "Images" tab and watch the videos. For some uneducated cockhead like Jamie Lambo to say the West is responsible for this is the stupidest thing ever written on the foum, which is saying quite a bit. ISIS go about terrorizing defenseless local people in areas they control with brutal force and death. They use a perverted interpretation if Islam to justify their actions. They believe their religion tells them to achieve an Islamic caliphate so they must expand their territory. Look it up. Their ambition goes back 1400 years. It has fuck-all to do with US policy.prahkeitouj wrote:What does the World War mean? Why ISIS can attract people to join? Why the world seem to be scared of ISIS?
and stop getting brave with the insults, you little cyber hooligan lol pathetic
Just to add couple of links with info from 1979 and US actings prior to Soviet intervention in Afghanistan.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BRZ110A.html
Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Jimmy Carter's National Security Adviser
Q: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn't believe them. However, there was a basis of truth. You don't regret anything today?
B: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter - We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war.
Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.
Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic fundamentalism, having given arms and advice to future terrorists?
B: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?
Q: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace today.
B: Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to Islam. That is stupid. There isn't a global Islam. Look at Islam in a rational manner and without demagoguery or emotion. It is the leading religion of the world with 1.5 billion followers. But what is there in common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate Morocco, Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian secularism? Nothing more than what unites the Christian countries.
http://www.historycommons.org/entity.js ... l-khidamar
Profile: Maktab al-Khidamat (MAK)
1980-1989: $600 Million for Afghan War Passes through Charity Fronts
From 1980 to 1989, about $600 million is passed through Osama bin Laden’s charity fronts, according to Michael Scheuer, head of the CIA’s first bin Laden unit. Most of it goes through the charity front Maktab al-Khidamat (MAK), also known as Al-Kifah. The money generally comes from donors in Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf, and is used to arm and supply the mujaheddin fighting in Afghanistan. Mohammad Yousaf, a high ranking ISI official, will later say, “It was largely Arab money that saved the system,” since so much of the aid given by the CIA and Saudi Arabia was siphoned away before it got to Afghanistan. “By this I mean cash from rich individuals or private organizations in the Arab world, not Saudi government funds. Without those extra millions the flow of arms actually getting to the mujaheddin would have been cut to a trickle.”
- Jamie_Lambo
- The Cool Boxing Guy
- Posts: 15039
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:34 am
- Reputation: 3132
- Location: ลพบุรี
Re: 128+ Dead After Shooting at Petit Cambodge Restaurant 100 Hostages Taken and Bombing at Stade de France in Paris, Fr
Spot on, thanksCJM555 wrote:Jamie_Lambo wrote:you really dont have a clue and have no research behind your statements, i see your education comes from Fox news.... maybe you should do some research about where ISIS/Al Qaeda/Taliban came from, what allowed them to come into such power, who funded them and created them initially, you have a lot to learn,Tits Mcgee wrote:^Don't listen to that punch-drunk moron with the child's perpsective. Google "ISIS killing" and look at the "Images" tab and watch the videos. For some uneducated cockhead like Jamie Lambo to say the West is responsible for this is the stupidest thing ever written on the foum, which is saying quite a bit. ISIS go about terrorizing defenseless local people in areas they control with brutal force and death. They use a perverted interpretation if Islam to justify their actions. They believe their religion tells them to achieve an Islamic caliphate so they must expand their territory. Look it up. Their ambition goes back 1400 years. It has fuck-all to do with US policy.prahkeitouj wrote:What does the World War mean? Why ISIS can attract people to join? Why the world seem to be scared of ISIS?
and stop getting brave with the insults, you little cyber hooligan lol pathetic
Just to add couple of links with info from 1979 and US actings prior to Soviet intervention in Afghanistan.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BRZ110A.html
Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Jimmy Carter's National Security Adviser
Q: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn't believe them. However, there was a basis of truth. You don't regret anything today?
B: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter - We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war.
Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.
Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic fundamentalism, having given arms and advice to future terrorists?
B: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?
Q: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace today.
B: Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to Islam. That is stupid. There isn't a global Islam. Look at Islam in a rational manner and without demagoguery or emotion. It is the leading religion of the world with 1.5 billion followers. But what is there in common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate Morocco, Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian secularism? Nothing more than what unites the Christian countries.
http://www.historycommons.org/entity.js ... l-khidamar
Profile: Maktab al-Khidamat (MAK)
1980-1989: $600 Million for Afghan War Passes through Charity Fronts
From 1980 to 1989, about $600 million is passed through Osama bin Laden’s charity fronts, according to Michael Scheuer, head of the CIA’s first bin Laden unit. Most of it goes through the charity front Maktab al-Khidamat (MAK), also known as Al-Kifah. The money generally comes from donors in Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf, and is used to arm and supply the mujaheddin fighting in Afghanistan. Mohammad Yousaf, a high ranking ISI official, will later say, “It was largely Arab money that saved the system,” since so much of the aid given by the CIA and Saudi Arabia was siphoned away before it got to Afghanistan. “By this I mean cash from rich individuals or private organizations in the Arab world, not Saudi government funds. Without those extra millions the flow of arms actually getting to the mujaheddin would have been cut to a trickle.”
Mean Dtuk Mean Trei, Mean Loy Mean Srey
Punchy McShortstacks School of Hard Knocks
Punchy McShortstacks School of Hard Knocks
Re: 128+ Dead After Shooting at Petit Cambodge Restaurant 100 Hostages Taken and Bombing at Stade de France in Paris, Fr
General Mackevili: I just don't want you littering our forum with your drivel.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 3 Replies
- 1907 Views
-
Last post by Clutch Cargo
-
- 6 Replies
- 1328 Views
-
Last post by Alex
-
- 14 Replies
- 5043 Views
-
Last post by Ghostwriter
-
- 3 Replies
- 1099 Views
-
Last post by Ghostwriter
-
- 18 Replies
- 5906 Views
-
Last post by Doc67
-
- 21 Replies
- 4989 Views
-
Last post by covidsux
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Khmu Nation, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 1324 guests