VIDEO: Ship hits Keys Bridge in Maryland (USA)

Yeah, that place out 'there'. Anything not really Cambodia related should go here.
Kahuna
Expatriate
Posts: 169
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 2:20 pm
Reputation: 149
Location: Vietnam
Australia

Re: VIDEO: Ship hits Keys Bridge in Maryland (USA)

Post by Kahuna »

Yobbo wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 4:07 pm
hanno wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 3:02 pm
Yobbo wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 2:27 pm Procedure calls for dropping the anchor, that's what may of steered into the bridge.
Unlikely that the anchor would have stopped a ship that size, that is not how anchors work. Also, looks like they ran out of time.
Stick to being a food critic!
"The 948-foot (288.95 m) vessel had experienced a momentary loss of propulsion and dropped anchors as part of emergency procedures before impact, its management company, Synergy Marine Pte Ltd reported, according to the Singapore Port Authority".
You can drop an anchor Yobbo but the chain is just going to continue to run out unless the chain brake is applied. A loss of ships power means it is possible that the anchor could not be stopped, no power means no chain brake (this is not a 10' tinny anchor we're talking about that you throw overboard at your favourite fishing spot. Even in a tinny it still takes time for an anchor to fasten onto the seabed and you are still going to be in motion even without power), released yes as that can be done by knocking the holding wedge out of the links in an emergency but power is required to stop the chain from unfurling too far. Too much chain does not stop any boat and with the forward momentum of a ship this size underway and fully laden even at port speed it is not going to come to a stop instantly.
User avatar
Yobbo
Expatriate
Posts: 1855
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2014 8:21 am
Reputation: 894
Australia

Re: VIDEO: Ship hits Keys Bridge in Maryland (USA)

Post by Yobbo »

Kahuna wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 5:24 pm
Yobbo wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 4:07 pm
hanno wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 3:02 pm
Yobbo wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 2:27 pm Procedure calls for dropping the anchor, that's what may of steered into the bridge.
Unlikely that the anchor would have stopped a ship that size, that is not how anchors work. Also, looks like they ran out of time.
Stick to being a food critic!
"The 948-foot (288.95 m) vessel had experienced a momentary loss of propulsion and dropped anchors as part of emergency procedures before impact, its management company, Synergy Marine Pte Ltd reported, according to the Singapore Port Authority".
You can drop an anchor Yobbo but the chain is just going to continue to run out unless the chain brake is applied.
:lol: :facepalm:
User avatar
Roryborealis
Expatriate
Posts: 469
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 10:05 pm
Reputation: 144

Re: VIDEO: Ship hits Keys Bridge in Maryland (USA)

Post by Roryborealis »

Two of the dead have been identified:

1. Maynor Yassir Suazo, 37
2. Miguel Luna, 49

Both were householders supporting their families.

https://nypost.com/2024/03/27/us-news/b ... l-america/
User avatar
Roryborealis
Expatriate
Posts: 469
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 10:05 pm
Reputation: 144

Re: VIDEO: Ship hits Keys Bridge in Maryland (USA)

Post by Roryborealis »

3. Dorlian Cabrera
4. Alejandro Hernandez Fuentes

https://www.cbsnews.com/baltimore/news/ ... unted-for/
User avatar
phuketrichard
Expatriate
Posts: 16884
Joined: Wed May 14, 2014 5:17 pm
Reputation: 5785
Location: Atlantis
Aruba

Re: VIDEO: Ship hits Keys Bridge in Maryland (USA)

Post by phuketrichard »

DAM 760 TONS of hazardous materials!!!
i imagine this will be a Very extensive investigation.
In a nation run by swine, all pigs are upward-mobile and the rest of us are fucked until we can put our acts together: not necessarily to win, but mainly to keep from losing completely. HST
Bluenose
Expatriate
Posts: 849
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2020 1:44 pm
Reputation: 464
Great Britain

Re: VIDEO: Ship hits Keys Bridge in Maryland (USA)

Post by Bluenose »

phuketrichard wrote: Thu Mar 28, 2024 7:19 am DAM 760 TONS of hazardous materials!!!
i imagine this will be a Very extensive investigation.
760 tons (56 containers) of hazardous materials, not unreasonable for a ship that size. Anyway, that's the hazardous material that is properly declared, packed, and stowed accordingly. The real worry is always the hazardous material that is undeclared, either deliberately or otherwise.
User avatar
Doc67
Expatriate
Posts: 8938
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:16 am
Reputation: 8219
Location: PHNOM PENH
Great Britain

Re: VIDEO: Ship hits Keys Bridge in Maryland (USA)

Post by Doc67 »

Why did Biden promise full federal funding to replace the bridge?

“It's my intention that the federal government will pay for the entire cost of reconstructing that bridge and I expect the Congress to support my effort," Biden said, speaking from the White House ahead of a trip to North Carolina.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden- ... 024-03-26/

Huge ships have huge insurance policies because when things go wrong, they can go wrong in a very big way. Think Exxon Valdez, Concordia etc.

So why is Biden promising 100% federal funding when the insurers must be liable for this cost. If this is a political stunt, it's a bit thin because the insurance liabilities are already being discussed in the media.**

Is it possible that he is so badly advised, or so mentally detached from reality, that he made up this pledge on the hoof without a thought for the obvious plethora of insurance policies that will be in place for just such disasters?

The marine insurance and reinsurance markets are likely to foot most of the bills, S&P Global reported on Tuesday.
The Baltimore bridge itself is insured by insurance giant Chubb, per Insurance Insider.
Dali, the ship, is covered by Britannia P&I Club, a specialist insurer that provides protection and indemnity cover for the maritime industry. Britannia is a member of the London-based International Group of P&I Clubs.


** https://www.businessinsider.com/baltimo ... 20industry.
Bluenose
Expatriate
Posts: 849
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2020 1:44 pm
Reputation: 464
Great Britain

Re: VIDEO: Ship hits Keys Bridge in Maryland (USA)

Post by Bluenose »

Doc67 wrote: Thu Mar 28, 2024 9:50 am Why did Biden promise full federal funding to replace the bridge?

“It's my intention that the federal government will pay for the entire cost of reconstructing that bridge and I expect the Congress to support my effort," Biden said, speaking from the White House ahead of a trip to North Carolina.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden- ... 024-03-26/

Huge ships have huge insurance policies because when things go wrong, they can go wrong in a very big way. Think Exxon Valdez, Concordia etc.

So why is Biden promising 100% federal funding when the insurers must be liable for this cost. If this is a political stunt, it's a bit thin because the insurance liabilities are already being discussed in the media.**

Is it possible that he is so badly advised, or so mentally detached from reality, that he made up this pledge on the hoof without a thought for the obvious plethora of insurance policies that will be in place for just such disasters?

The marine insurance and reinsurance markets are likely to foot most of the bills, S&P Global reported on Tuesday.
The Baltimore bridge itself is insured by insurance giant Chubb, per Insurance Insider.
Dali, the ship, is covered by Britannia P&I Club, a specialist insurer that provides protection and indemnity cover for the maritime industry. Britannia is a member of the London-based International Group of P&I Clubs.


** https://www.businessinsider.com/baltimo ... 20industry.
He also remembers crossing the bridge by train many times which is strange since it never had a railway on it
User avatar
John Bingham
Expatriate
Posts: 13784
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2014 11:26 pm
Reputation: 8983
Cambodia

Re: VIDEO: Ship hits Keys Bridge in Maryland (USA)

Post by John Bingham »

Doc67 wrote: Thu Mar 28, 2024 9:50 am Why did Biden promise full federal funding to replace the bridge?

“It's my intention that the federal government will pay for the entire cost of reconstructing that bridge and I expect the Congress to support my effort," Biden said, speaking from the White House ahead of a trip to North Carolina.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden- ... 024-03-26/

Huge ships have huge insurance policies because when things go wrong, they can go wrong in a very big way. Think Exxon Valdez, Concordia etc.

So why is Biden promising 100% federal funding when the insurers must be liable for this cost. If this is a political stunt, it's a bit thin because the insurance liabilities are already being discussed in the media.**

Is it possible that he is so badly advised, or so mentally detached from reality, that he made up this pledge on the hoof without a thought for the obvious plethora of insurance policies that will be in place for just such disasters?

The marine insurance and reinsurance markets are likely to foot most of the bills, S&P Global reported on Tuesday.
The Baltimore bridge itself is insured by insurance giant Chubb, per Insurance Insider.
Dali, the ship, is covered by Britannia P&I Club, a specialist insurer that provides protection and indemnity cover for the maritime industry. Britannia is a member of the London-based International Group of P&I Clubs.


** https://www.businessinsider.com/baltimo ... 20industry.
Chubb underwrote Cheeto Jesus' $92 million bond for his E. Jean Carroll defamation appeal. So they must be behind this whole disaster. They'll probably refuse to pay anyway, like Broke "Bible Seller" Don always does. 8)
Silence, exile, and cunning.
User avatar
hanno
Expatriate
Posts: 6812
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 12:37 pm
Reputation: 3184
Location: Phnom Penh
Contact:
Germany

Re: VIDEO: Ship hits Keys Bridge in Maryland (USA)

Post by hanno »

Doc67 wrote: Thu Mar 28, 2024 9:50 am Why did Biden promise full federal funding to replace the bridge?

“It's my intention that the federal government will pay for the entire cost of reconstructing that bridge and I expect the Congress to support my effort," Biden said, speaking from the White House ahead of a trip to North Carolina.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden- ... 024-03-26/

Huge ships have huge insurance policies because when things go wrong, they can go wrong in a very big way. Think Exxon Valdez, Concordia etc.

So why is Biden promising 100% federal funding when the insurers must be liable for this cost. If this is a political stunt, it's a bit thin because the insurance liabilities are already being discussed in the media.**
Not that straightforward, apparently. The ship owners could even invoke a 1851 law, limiting how much they pay:

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/03/28/busi ... index.html
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Newinkow, SINUS and 582 guests