MOON LANDING HOAX CONFESSION
- Username Taken
- Raven
- Posts: 13937
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 6:53 pm
- Reputation: 6005
MOON LANDING HOAX CONFESSION
Following on from the discussions about 9/11 and UFOs, this popped up on my Youtube feed today.
MOON LANDING HOAX CONFESSION
314,373 views Sep 14, 2022 ORDER THE BOOK
MOON MAN: THE TRUE STORY OF A FILMMAKER ON THE CIA HIT LIST
Comments have been turned off for this video on Youtube.
One year to the day after the publication of the revelatory book "Moon Man: The True Story of a Filmmaker on the CIA Hit List", which divulges the deathbed confession of the former Chief of Security at Cannon Air Force Base in Clovis New Mexico, who confessed thereon to his participation in the falsification of the first "moon landing", his identity is finally revealed. This predetermined waiting period was previously negotiated with his sole surviving son, who himself passed away this year.
Cyrus Eugene Akers detailed the information in the book, including not only the location of the filming of the first fake moon landing at his military base, the dates it was filmed, and the CIA codename for the operation, he also gave the names of fifteen government scientists and officials who were allowed exclusive observation of this historic government fraud, some of whom are still alive today. The list was given to Akers by President Lyndon Johnson, who was there at the first day of filming.
Threatened with execution if he ever revealed this information, Security Chief Akers kept all of this to himself until his deathbed, the guilt from which prompted his tearful confession to his son, who was also threatened with assassination after sharing this information with the author of Moon Man, Bart Sibrel.
This sad and outrageous, and really unnecessary deception, was done for pride and embezzlement. It demonstrates the complete arrogance of leaders over their people, who in fact are financing their own deception. Unlike government frauds about war, assassination, or terrorism, the moon landing deception cruelly gave the over-trusting public the pleasing candy that they cried out for. Trying to take it away from them, after they believed with tears and cheers, by exposing their heroes as the criminals they really are, faces fierce resistance. Even a professor at a major university has so famously said, "Even if I heard a moon astronaut confess that he never really went, I would still believe that he walked on the moon."
Fortunately a new generation is here, ones who were not emotionally branded by the deception, who are objective to the unfolding reality of the moon landings falsification. Simply put, what the corrupt government is claiming, is that in 1969 they went from never being in space, to walking on the moon, with only 8 years of research and development, and that with one-millionth the computing of a cell phone, and on the first attempt, when even the South Pole on Earth was not reached on the first attempt.
Today, with 50 years of more advanced rocket and computer technology, the current Artemis moon rocket took 18 years to develop, had three launch failures, is not safe enough yet to carry astronauts, and will only orbit the moon, because a moon lander for it has not yet been developed that works. The farthest that the government can send astronauts today, 50 years later, is to the space station, which is only one-thousandth the distance to the moon.
For the first time in the entire history of the world, technology was greater in the past than in the future. As this is actually impossible, it only means one thing, that the 1969 moon landing was a forgery. It is not the first time scientific boasts were falsified or governments have lied, as covid vaccine maker Prizer has been fined billions of dollars, on multiple occasions, for making fraudulent claims about their scientific products.
Former high-ranking government employee Robert McNamara, who was Defense Secretary during the Vietnam War, admitted before he died that the "Gulf of Tonkin Incident", which was the reason why the war began, was completely fabricated by the CIA. If the corrupt government is willing to falsify something that led to the death of a million people, including 58,220 of their own citizens, then I think they are capable of faking an image on a television.
All Truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed,
Then it is violently opposed,
Finally it is accepted as self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer
In an age of universal deceit,
telling the Truth is a revolutionary act.
Whoever controls the past, controls the future.
George Orwell
One of the saddest lessons of history is this:
If we’ve been bamboozled long enough,
we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle.
We’re no longer interested in finding out the Truth.
The bamboozle has captured us.
It’s simply too painful to acknowledge,
even to ourselves,
that we’ve been taken.
Once you give a charlatan power over you,
you almost never get it back.
Carl Sagan
It is easier to fool people,
than to convince them that they have been fooled.
Mark Twain
Sibrel has been interviewed and appeared on The Tonight Show, The Daily Show, Geraldo, The Abrams Report, Coast to Coast, NBC, CNN, FOX, HBO, Time Magazine, the New York Times, the L.A. Times, the Washington Post, and USA Today
This link is provided on the Youtube, but I haven't checked it out (yet). https://www.sibrel.com/
MOON LANDING HOAX CONFESSION
314,373 views Sep 14, 2022 ORDER THE BOOK
MOON MAN: THE TRUE STORY OF A FILMMAKER ON THE CIA HIT LIST
Comments have been turned off for this video on Youtube.
One year to the day after the publication of the revelatory book "Moon Man: The True Story of a Filmmaker on the CIA Hit List", which divulges the deathbed confession of the former Chief of Security at Cannon Air Force Base in Clovis New Mexico, who confessed thereon to his participation in the falsification of the first "moon landing", his identity is finally revealed. This predetermined waiting period was previously negotiated with his sole surviving son, who himself passed away this year.
Cyrus Eugene Akers detailed the information in the book, including not only the location of the filming of the first fake moon landing at his military base, the dates it was filmed, and the CIA codename for the operation, he also gave the names of fifteen government scientists and officials who were allowed exclusive observation of this historic government fraud, some of whom are still alive today. The list was given to Akers by President Lyndon Johnson, who was there at the first day of filming.
Threatened with execution if he ever revealed this information, Security Chief Akers kept all of this to himself until his deathbed, the guilt from which prompted his tearful confession to his son, who was also threatened with assassination after sharing this information with the author of Moon Man, Bart Sibrel.
This sad and outrageous, and really unnecessary deception, was done for pride and embezzlement. It demonstrates the complete arrogance of leaders over their people, who in fact are financing their own deception. Unlike government frauds about war, assassination, or terrorism, the moon landing deception cruelly gave the over-trusting public the pleasing candy that they cried out for. Trying to take it away from them, after they believed with tears and cheers, by exposing their heroes as the criminals they really are, faces fierce resistance. Even a professor at a major university has so famously said, "Even if I heard a moon astronaut confess that he never really went, I would still believe that he walked on the moon."
Fortunately a new generation is here, ones who were not emotionally branded by the deception, who are objective to the unfolding reality of the moon landings falsification. Simply put, what the corrupt government is claiming, is that in 1969 they went from never being in space, to walking on the moon, with only 8 years of research and development, and that with one-millionth the computing of a cell phone, and on the first attempt, when even the South Pole on Earth was not reached on the first attempt.
Today, with 50 years of more advanced rocket and computer technology, the current Artemis moon rocket took 18 years to develop, had three launch failures, is not safe enough yet to carry astronauts, and will only orbit the moon, because a moon lander for it has not yet been developed that works. The farthest that the government can send astronauts today, 50 years later, is to the space station, which is only one-thousandth the distance to the moon.
For the first time in the entire history of the world, technology was greater in the past than in the future. As this is actually impossible, it only means one thing, that the 1969 moon landing was a forgery. It is not the first time scientific boasts were falsified or governments have lied, as covid vaccine maker Prizer has been fined billions of dollars, on multiple occasions, for making fraudulent claims about their scientific products.
Former high-ranking government employee Robert McNamara, who was Defense Secretary during the Vietnam War, admitted before he died that the "Gulf of Tonkin Incident", which was the reason why the war began, was completely fabricated by the CIA. If the corrupt government is willing to falsify something that led to the death of a million people, including 58,220 of their own citizens, then I think they are capable of faking an image on a television.
All Truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed,
Then it is violently opposed,
Finally it is accepted as self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer
In an age of universal deceit,
telling the Truth is a revolutionary act.
Whoever controls the past, controls the future.
George Orwell
One of the saddest lessons of history is this:
If we’ve been bamboozled long enough,
we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle.
We’re no longer interested in finding out the Truth.
The bamboozle has captured us.
It’s simply too painful to acknowledge,
even to ourselves,
that we’ve been taken.
Once you give a charlatan power over you,
you almost never get it back.
Carl Sagan
It is easier to fool people,
than to convince them that they have been fooled.
Mark Twain
Sibrel has been interviewed and appeared on The Tonight Show, The Daily Show, Geraldo, The Abrams Report, Coast to Coast, NBC, CNN, FOX, HBO, Time Magazine, the New York Times, the L.A. Times, the Washington Post, and USA Today
This link is provided on the Youtube, but I haven't checked it out (yet). https://www.sibrel.com/
- Freightdog
- Expatriate
- Posts: 4394
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2018 8:41 am
- Reputation: 3478
- Location: Attached to a suitcase between realities
Re: MOON LANDING HOAX CONFESSION
Ok. I’ll bite, a little.
Health And safety, litigation, and a whole host of modern rules and regulations would have grounded the space program among others, and probably indicted the perpetrators before they ever left the first meeting.
In fact, some of the safer endeavours of engineering that I was involved in only 25-30years ago could never happen, now.
Back then (50s/60s/70s), the right stuff was probably the work ethic, not just the manuscript of a book, let alone the reason not to go to the office today. Several unequal comparisons in there.
Health And safety, litigation, and a whole host of modern rules and regulations would have grounded the space program among others, and probably indicted the perpetrators before they ever left the first meeting.
In fact, some of the safer endeavours of engineering that I was involved in only 25-30years ago could never happen, now.
Back then (50s/60s/70s), the right stuff was probably the work ethic, not just the manuscript of a book, let alone the reason not to go to the office today. Several unequal comparisons in there.
Re: MOON LANDING HOAX CONFESSION
It was an unlikely success story. Extremely unlikely in fact.
If it didn't actually happen, that would surprise me less than if it did.
If it didn't actually happen, that would surprise me less than if it did.
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2019 3:43 pm
- Reputation: 1343
Re: MOON LANDING HOAX CONFESSION
I’ve always kept an open mind regarding the moon landing being genuine, but it’s strange that in 50 years they’ve never been back to the moon.
Is it because it was a hoax, and to actually go there might expose that fact? imagine if astronauts don’t really appear to be bouncing on springs when walking on the moon, or if clouds of dust billow up into the air on each footstep, or that flags float upwards.
If it indeed was a hoax, perhaps there’s an agreement that an actual attempt will not be made until after all those involved in the hoax are no longer living?
Is it because it was a hoax, and to actually go there might expose that fact? imagine if astronauts don’t really appear to be bouncing on springs when walking on the moon, or if clouds of dust billow up into the air on each footstep, or that flags float upwards.
If it indeed was a hoax, perhaps there’s an agreement that an actual attempt will not be made until after all those involved in the hoax are no longer living?
- CEOCambodiaNews
- Expatriate
- Posts: 62459
- Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 5:13 am
- Reputation: 4034
- Location: CEO Newsroom in Phnom Penh, Cambodia
- Contact:
Re: MOON LANDING HOAX CONFESSION
Link posted on the OP: https://www.sibrel.com/
Follow-up:
(Who is) Bart Sibrel ? - wikipedia
He is a person who makes a living from conspiracy theories.
Background
Sibrel has been director of TV commercials and is sometimes identified as a maker of "documentaries" in respect of his self-released Moon landing denial films, though other sources point out the personal distribution, limited release, and style and content call into question placing Sibrel's work in this genre of filmmaking (e.g., with the St. Petersburg Times and The New York Times placing the word documentary in quotation marks in some of their reports).
This concern relates in part to Sibrel's record of misrepresenting his identity to the subjects he attempts to interview, notably repeated attempts involving former astronauts including Buzz Aldrin, Neil Armstrong, Alan Bean, Eugene Cernan, and Edgar Mitchell (where Sibrel posed as filmmaker associated with the History Channel).
As of 2002, Sibrel, was operating a video production company in Nashville, Tennessee, and had "made a career out of perpetuating the notion that NASA's Apollo moon missions were hoaxes."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bart_Sibrel
Follow-up:
(Who is) Bart Sibrel ? - wikipedia
He is a person who makes a living from conspiracy theories.
Background
Sibrel has been director of TV commercials and is sometimes identified as a maker of "documentaries" in respect of his self-released Moon landing denial films, though other sources point out the personal distribution, limited release, and style and content call into question placing Sibrel's work in this genre of filmmaking (e.g., with the St. Petersburg Times and The New York Times placing the word documentary in quotation marks in some of their reports).
This concern relates in part to Sibrel's record of misrepresenting his identity to the subjects he attempts to interview, notably repeated attempts involving former astronauts including Buzz Aldrin, Neil Armstrong, Alan Bean, Eugene Cernan, and Edgar Mitchell (where Sibrel posed as filmmaker associated with the History Channel).
As of 2002, Sibrel, was operating a video production company in Nashville, Tennessee, and had "made a career out of perpetuating the notion that NASA's Apollo moon missions were hoaxes."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bart_Sibrel
Join the Cambodia Expats Online Telegram Channel: https://t.me/CambodiaExpatsOnline
Cambodia Expats Online: Bringing you breaking news from Cambodia before you read it anywhere else!
Have a story or an anonymous news tip for CEO? Need advertising? CONTACT US
Cambodia Expats Online is the most popular community in the country. JOIN TODAY
Follow CEO on social media:
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Instagram
Cambodia Expats Online: Bringing you breaking news from Cambodia before you read it anywhere else!
Have a story or an anonymous news tip for CEO? Need advertising? CONTACT US
Cambodia Expats Online is the most popular community in the country. JOIN TODAY
Follow CEO on social media:
YouTube
- truffledog
- Expatriate
- Posts: 1662
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2020 4:54 am
- Reputation: 1030
Re: MOON LANDING HOAX CONFESSION
How much technology did Apollo 11 have?
The Apollo Guidance Computer had RAM of 4KB, a 32KB hard disk. It was fairly compact for its time, measuring 60cm x 30cm x 15cm, but weighed around 30kg.
Is my phone more powerful than Apollo 11?
Your smartphone is millions of times more powerful than the Apollo 11 guidance computers.
was it really possible to fly to the moon with such an equipment?
The Apollo Guidance Computer had RAM of 4KB, a 32KB hard disk. It was fairly compact for its time, measuring 60cm x 30cm x 15cm, but weighed around 30kg.
Is my phone more powerful than Apollo 11?
Your smartphone is millions of times more powerful than the Apollo 11 guidance computers.
was it really possible to fly to the moon with such an equipment?
work is for people who cant find truffles
Re: MOON LANDING HOAX CONFESSION
I don't profess to have any answers, but it brought back to mind the stories of three black women who were outstanding mathematicians and did much of the paper calculations to put folks into space. Surely there's some truth to this.
From NPR:
Headline: 'Hidden Figures': How Black Women Did The Math That Put Men On The Moon
https://www.npr.org/2016/09/25/49517982 ... n-the-moon
Headline: How three black women helped send John Glenn into orbit
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/d ... space-race
Headline: Katherine Johnson Dies at 101; Mathematician Broke Barriers at NASA
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/24/scie ... -dead.html
From NPR:
Headline: 'Hidden Figures': How Black Women Did The Math That Put Men On The Moon
https://www.npr.org/2016/09/25/49517982 ... n-the-moon
Headline: How three black women helped send John Glenn into orbit
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/d ... space-race
Headline: Katherine Johnson Dies at 101; Mathematician Broke Barriers at NASA
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/24/scie ... -dead.html
- Username Taken
- Raven
- Posts: 13937
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 6:53 pm
- Reputation: 6005
Re: MOON LANDING HOAX CONFESSION
How to quickly discredit anyone that asks questions, just throw in that 'conspiracy theorist' tag. After that, folks without the ability to think for themselves or those that have similar questions will button their lip for fear of being tagged.CEOCambodiaNews wrote: ↑Sun Sep 18, 2022 11:33 pm Link posted on the OP: https://www.sibrel.com/
Follow-up:
(Who is) Bart Sibrel ? - wikipedia
He is a person who makes a living from conspiracy theories.
Background
Sibrel has been director of TV commercials and is sometimes identified as a maker of "documentaries" in respect of his self-released Moon landing denial films, though other sources point out the personal distribution, limited release, and style and content call into question placing Sibrel's work in this genre of filmmaking (e.g., with the St. Petersburg Times and The New York Times placing the word documentary in quotation marks in some of their reports).
This concern relates in part to Sibrel's record of misrepresenting his identity to the subjects he attempts to interview, notably repeated attempts involving former astronauts including Buzz Aldrin, Neil Armstrong, Alan Bean, Eugene Cernan, and Edgar Mitchell (where Sibrel posed as filmmaker associated with the History Channel).
As of 2002, Sibrel, was operating a video production company in Nashville, Tennessee, and had "made a career out of perpetuating the notion that NASA's Apollo moon missions were hoaxes."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bart_Sibrel
Discussion is easy to stifle.
- phuketrichard
- Expatriate
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2014 5:17 pm
- Reputation: 5782
- Location: Atlantis
Re: MOON LANDING HOAX CONFESSION
nowadays with the internet, an little fact checking or anyone being held responsible, there are ALWAYS two sides to every story and each side will attempt to discredit the other>
hence reason nobody anymore knows who to believe or what the "truth" is
hence reason nobody anymore knows who to believe or what the "truth" is
In a nation run by swine, all pigs are upward-mobile and the rest of us are fucked until we can put our acts together: not necessarily to win, but mainly to keep from losing completely. HST
- hanno
- Expatriate
- Posts: 6811
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 12:37 pm
- Reputation: 3182
- Location: Phnom Penh
- Contact:
Re: MOON LANDING HOAX CONFESSION
Yes, I think so. It is not like they just got up one morning and flew to the moon. Research went back all the way back to WWII.truffledog wrote: ↑Sun Sep 18, 2022 11:42 pm How much technology did Apollo 11 have?
The Apollo Guidance Computer had RAM of 4KB, a 32KB hard disk. It was fairly compact for its time, measuring 60cm x 30cm x 15cm, but weighed around 30kg.
Is my phone more powerful than Apollo 11?
Your smartphone is millions of times more powerful than the Apollo 11 guidance computers.
was it really possible to fly to the moon with such an equipment?
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 21 Replies
- 4029 Views
-
Last post by Kampuchia Crumbs
-
- 21 Replies
- 1918 Views
-
Last post by Doc67
-
- 5 Replies
- 1235 Views
-
Last post by kagi
-
- 0 Replies
- 1964 Views
-
Last post by SternAAlbifrons
-
- 23 Replies
- 5842 Views
-
Last post by phuketrichard
-
- 4 Replies
- 3773 Views
-
Last post by Fridaywithmateo
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 519 guests