Do you support Ukraine or Russia?
- Random Dude
- Expatriate
- Posts: 1034
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2021 5:54 am
- Reputation: 1143
Re: Do you support Ukraine or Russia?
They were taking out submarines with depth charges rolled off the back of a ship back in WW2, if it was possible to land one close to a sub you couldn't see back in the 1940s it couldn't be that hard to drop one on a pipeline in 2022.Kammekor wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 8:45 amThe pipe is large enough for (robot) carts to drive through it for observation and maintenance. Arm one of them with some explosives on the Russian side and let it drive Westbound........... No need for high tech underwater drones to do this.
Not saying this is how it went, it's just one of the options.
Re: Do you support Ukraine or Russia?
Subs didn't operate at a depth of 80 meters when attacking.Random Dude wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 11:16 am They were taking out submarines with depth charges rolled off the back of a ship back in WW2, if it was possible to land one close to a sub you couldn't see back in the 1940s it couldn't be that hard to drop one on a pipeline in 2022.
- Random Dude
- Expatriate
- Posts: 1034
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2021 5:54 am
- Reputation: 1143
Re: Do you support Ukraine or Russia?
Ok. My point was that if it was possible to take out a sub by dropping a bomb off the back of a boat 80 some years ago, taking out a non-moving target you can see must be a lot easier, even if you only used WW2 style depth charges. When you have access to things like pigs and drones it must be easier still.Kammekor wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 11:35 amSubs didn't operate at a depth of 80 meters when attacking.Random Dude wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 11:16 am They were taking out submarines with depth charges rolled off the back of a ship back in WW2, if it was possible to land one close to a sub you couldn't see back in the 1940s it couldn't be that hard to drop one on a pipeline in 2022.
Re: Do you support Ukraine or Russia?
I don't know, I've heard expert tell me it's a pretty difficult job if you want to make it a precise action from the sea. They could of course drop a hundred depth charges, and it would probably do the trick, but it would be way too obvious. Sneaking in, precisely, under water without access to GPS, placing and uncharging some explosives (per pipe?) at a depth of 80M in muddy water and getting out silently apparently is considered a difficult job. Well, that's what the experts say.Random Dude wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 11:48 amOk. My point was that if it was possible to take out a sub by dropping a bomb off the back of a boat 80 some years ago, taking out a non-moving target you can see must be a lot easier, even if you only used WW2 style depth charges. When you have access to things like pigs and drones it must be easier still.Kammekor wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 11:35 amSubs didn't operate at a depth of 80 meters when attacking.Random Dude wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 11:16 am They were taking out submarines with depth charges rolled off the back of a ship back in WW2, if it was possible to land one close to a sub you couldn't see back in the 1940s it couldn't be that hard to drop one on a pipeline in 2022.
Time will tell if this was done from the outside or the inside. I guess they can tell it from what they see when they can access the pipe.
Re: Do you support Ukraine or Russia?
Deep sea divers can go to that depth.
Like Random Dude said, charges could of been laid.
It is mapped & detectable.
If they can take out a state of the art guided missile destroyer (USS Cole) with an inflatable dinky
and fly a plane into the pentagon.
Then I'm picturing this guy in a divers suit & a bomb vest holding a metal detector....and a Russian passport
Like Random Dude said, charges could of been laid.
It is mapped & detectable.
If they can take out a state of the art guided missile destroyer (USS Cole) with an inflatable dinky
and fly a plane into the pentagon.
Then I'm picturing this guy in a divers suit & a bomb vest holding a metal detector....and a Russian passport
Re: Do you support Ukraine or Russia?
There are deep sea divers that go to that depth. If a free diver can go well beyond, you can be sure specialist deep sea divers are operating
https://centerforsurfresearch.org/deepest-free-dive/
https://divernet.com/scuba-news/divers- ... ric-wreck/
I once considered this path
https://www.itv.com/news/meridian/2021- ... underwater
https://centerforsurfresearch.org/deepest-free-dive/
https://divernet.com/scuba-news/divers- ... ric-wreck/
I once considered this path
https://www.itv.com/news/meridian/2021- ... underwater
Despite what angsta states, it’s clear from reading through his posts that angsta supports the free FreePalestine movement.
- Freightdog
- Expatriate
- Posts: 4386
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2018 8:41 am
- Reputation: 3474
- Location: Attached to a suitcase between realities
Re: Do you support Ukraine or Russia?
If he’s wearing a bomb vest, though, I’d say the bends are not one of his concerns…
Re: Do you support Ukraine or Russia?
^shell shock?
Despite what angsta states, it’s clear from reading through his posts that angsta supports the free FreePalestine movement.
Re: Do you support Ukraine or Russia?
I think the issue is not just whether divers can go 80M deep or not, they can, but it all has to happen unnoticed and an explosive (or multiple) have to be installed. I've never been in 80M deep water but I can imagine working down there isn't easy, and getting there and back will take quite some time with the dive, the work, and the trip back with all the decompression.violet wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 4:12 pm There are deep sea divers that go to that depth. If a free diver can go well beyond, you can be sure specialist deep sea divers are operating
https://centerforsurfresearch.org/deepest-free-dive/
https://divernet.com/scuba-news/divers- ... ric-wreck/
I once considered this path
https://www.itv.com/news/meridian/2021- ... underwater
Anyway, they did it the way they did successfully and that's f*cking scary in itself. What's next on the seafloor?
Re: Do you support Ukraine or Russia?
Even if it is discovered beyond a shadow of a doubt who was responsible, it is very, very unlikely it will ever be made public.
If it was the Ruskies, they will simply deny it and use the accusations to further escalate the war, making the possibility of NATO intervention even more likely, and if it was anyone else. well, they aint gonna make that public are they?
My hunch is that it was a clear message / warning from Russia to the rest of the world to show that Putin doesn't have to go bombing NATO countries to seek revenge on the west when it's easier for him to attack critical infrustructure, leaving NATO with no clear, defined or obvious reason to attack.
If it was the Ruskies, they will simply deny it and use the accusations to further escalate the war, making the possibility of NATO intervention even more likely, and if it was anyone else. well, they aint gonna make that public are they?
My hunch is that it was a clear message / warning from Russia to the rest of the world to show that Putin doesn't have to go bombing NATO countries to seek revenge on the west when it's easier for him to attack critical infrustructure, leaving NATO with no clear, defined or obvious reason to attack.
The difference between animals and humans is that animals would never allow the dumb ones to lead the pack.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 19 Replies
- 5068 Views
-
Last post by Kenr
-
- 1 Replies
- 1919 Views
-
Last post by Alex
-
- 1 Replies
- 2834 Views
-
Last post by Clutch Cargo
-
- 4 Replies
- 3176 Views
-
Last post by HaifongWangchuck
-
- 7 Replies
- 3324 Views
-
Last post by hdgh29
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ali baba, Whatsupdoc and 252 guests