Chad Sexington wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 6:38 am

nerdlinger wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 4:49 am

bittermelon wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 4:38 am Crazy short.
There has been some debate on other threads about vigilante justice, some, that to my mind seem a little naive and idealistic saying there is never a place for it, and others saying that with a dysfunctional criminal justice system it's a necessary evil.
It's possibly inappropriate and illegal but if it wasn't I would suggest some kind of a fundraising effort, a mama noodle fund for some of his new neighbors.

The IQ of a mob is the IQ of its stupidest member divided by the number of people in the mob.

Then divide that number by the age of the abuse victim to calculate the IQ of someone who thinks a 29 month jail sentence is suitable punishment for a crime of this nature (bear in mind that in the UK a prisoner usually only serves half of that sentence in jail, in this instance less than 15 months)

Gary Cosgrove and all of his kind should be put to death, and if the state won’t do it, then Ive got no problem with vigilantes who will.

I’ve said it before, anyone who chooses to harm children, has stepped over a line from which there is no returning. Paedophiles cannot be, nor deserve to be rehabilitated, and children deserve better than being put at risk by convicted paedophiles being released back in to society.

Cue the cries of “what if an innocent person is mistakenly targeted by a vigilante mob?”
To that I say, unfortunate as it may be, if it acts as a deterrent to actual child abusing predators, then that’s a risk we should be prepared to accept. A ‘mob’ doing the wrong thing for the right reason, is preferable to a state treating paedophiles (and anyone else who intentionally hurts children) with kid gloves.

simon43 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 7:31 am

Cue the cries of “what if an innocent person is mistakenly targeted by a vigilante mob?”
To that I say, unfortunate as it may be, if it acts as a deterrent to actual child abusing predators, then that’s a risk we should be prepared to accept.

Wow! You condone vigilante mobs acting against the wrong person?! Fcuked up beyond all believe

violet wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 7:51 am

Chad Sexington wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 6:38 am

nerdlinger wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 4:49 am

bittermelon wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 4:38 am Crazy short.
There has been some debate on other threads about vigilante justice, some, that to my mind seem a little naive and idealistic saying there is never a place for it, and others saying that with a dysfunctional criminal justice system it's a necessary evil.
It's possibly inappropriate and illegal but if it wasn't I would suggest some kind of a fundraising effort, a mama noodle fund for some of his new neighbors.

The IQ of a mob is the IQ of its stupidest member divided by the number of people in the mob.

Then divide that number by the age of the abuse victim to calculate the IQ of someone who thinks a 29 month jail sentence is suitable punishment for a crime of this nature (bear in mind that in the UK a prisoner usually only serves half of that sentence in jail, in this instance less than 15 months)

Gary Cosgrove and all of his kind should be put to death, and if the state won’t do it, then Ive got no problem with vigilantes who will.

I’ve said it before, anyone who chooses to harm children, has stepped over a line from which there is no returning. Paedophiles cannot be, nor deserve to be rehabilitated, and children deserve better than being put at risk by convicted paedophiles being released back in to society.

Cue the cries of “what if an innocent person is mistakenly targeted by a vigilante mob?”
To that I say, unfortunate as it may be, if it acts as a deterrent to actual child abusing predators, then that’s a risk we should be prepared to accept. A ‘mob’ doing the wrong thing for the right reason, is preferable to a state treating paedophiles (and anyone else who intentionally hurts children) with kid gloves.

yep... hands up here. I'm crying that it's simply not ok to have an innocent person wrongly attacked. No, it's not preferable to a state treating paedophiles with kid gloves. Neither is acceptable.

Chad Sexington wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 6:38 am

nerdlinger wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 4:49 am

bittermelon wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 4:38 am Crazy short.
There has been some debate on other threads about vigilante justice, some, that to my mind seem a little naive and idealistic saying there is never a place for it, and others saying that with a dysfunctional criminal justice system it's a necessary evil.
It's possibly inappropriate and illegal but if it wasn't I would suggest some kind of a fundraising effort, a mama noodle fund for some of his new neighbors.

The IQ of a mob is the IQ of its stupidest member divided by the number of people in the mob.

Then divide that number by the age of the abuse victim to calculate the IQ of someone who thinks a 29 month jail sentence is suitable punishment for a crime of this nature (bear in mind that in the UK a prisoner usually only serves half of that sentence in jail, in this instance less than 15 months)

Gary Cosgrove and all of his kind should be put to death, and if the state won’t do it, then Ive got no problem with vigilantes who will.

I’ve said it before, anyone who chooses to harm children, has stepped over a line from which there is no returning. Paedophiles cannot be, nor deserve to be rehabilitated, and children deserve better than being put at risk by convicted paedophiles being released back in to society.

Cue the cries of “what if an innocent person is mistakenly targeted by a vigilante mob?”
To that I say, unfortunate as it may be, if it acts as a deterrent to actual child abusing predators, then that’s a risk we should be prepared to accept. A ‘mob’ doing the wrong thing for the right reason, is preferable to a state treating paedophiles (and anyone else who intentionally hurts children) with kid gloves.

Pseudonomdeplume wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 1:37 pm

Chad Sexington wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 6:38 am

nerdlinger wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 4:49 am

bittermelon wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 4:38 am Crazy short.
There has been some debate on other threads about vigilante justice, some, that to my mind seem a little naive and idealistic saying there is never a place for it, and others saying that with a dysfunctional criminal justice system it's a necessary evil.
It's possibly inappropriate and illegal but if it wasn't I would suggest some kind of a fundraising effort, a mama noodle fund for some of his new neighbors.

The IQ of a mob is the IQ of its stupidest member divided by the number of people in the mob.

Then divide that number by the age of the abuse victim to calculate the IQ of someone who thinks a 29 month jail sentence is suitable punishment for a crime of this nature (bear in mind that in the UK a prisoner usually only serves half of that sentence in jail, in this instance less than 15 months)

Gary Cosgrove and all of his kind should be put to death, and if the state won’t do it, then Ive got no problem with vigilantes who will.

I’ve said it before, anyone who chooses to harm children, has stepped over a line from which there is no returning. Paedophiles cannot be, nor deserve to be rehabilitated, and children deserve better than being put at risk by convicted paedophiles being released back in to society.

Cue the cries of “what if an innocent person is mistakenly targeted by a vigilante mob?”
To that I say, unfortunate as it may be, if it acts as a deterrent to actual child abusing predators, then that’s a risk we should be prepared to accept. A ‘mob’ doing the wrong thing for the right reason, is preferable to a state treating paedophiles (and anyone else who intentionally hurts children) with kid gloves.

Thank fuck you're not in charge. You would be a Trump supporter.

Chad Sexington wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 1:42 pm

Pseudonomdeplume wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 1:37 pm

Chad Sexington wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 6:38 am

nerdlinger wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 4:49 am

bittermelon wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 4:38 am Crazy short.
There has been some debate on other threads about vigilante justice, some, that to my mind seem a little naive and idealistic saying there is never a place for it, and others saying that with a dysfunctional criminal justice system it's a necessary evil.
It's possibly inappropriate and illegal but if it wasn't I would suggest some kind of a fundraising effort, a mama noodle fund for some of his new neighbors.

The IQ of a mob is the IQ of its stupidest member divided by the number of people in the mob.

Then divide that number by the age of the abuse victim to calculate the IQ of someone who thinks a 29 month jail sentence is suitable punishment for a crime of this nature (bear in mind that in the UK a prisoner usually only serves half of that sentence in jail, in this instance less than 15 months)

Gary Cosgrove and all of his kind should be put to death, and if the state won’t do it, then Ive got no problem with vigilantes who will.

I’ve said it before, anyone who chooses to harm children, has stepped over a line from which there is no returning. Paedophiles cannot be, nor deserve to be rehabilitated, and children deserve better than being put at risk by convicted paedophiles being released back in to society.

Cue the cries of “what if an innocent person is mistakenly targeted by a vigilante mob?”
To that I say, unfortunate as it may be, if it acts as a deterrent to actual child abusing predators, then that’s a risk we should be prepared to accept. A ‘mob’ doing the wrong thing for the right reason, is preferable to a state treating paedophiles (and anyone else who intentionally hurts children) with kid gloves.

Thank fuck you're not in charge. You would be a Trump supporter.

You must be a Kiddie Sniffer Biden supporter. Your TDS is showing.

Pseudonomdeplume wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 1:48 pm

Chad Sexington wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 1:42 pm

Pseudonomdeplume wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 1:37 pm

Chad Sexington wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 6:38 am

nerdlinger wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 4:49 am

The IQ of a mob is the IQ of its stupidest member divided by the number of people in the mob.

Then divide that number by the age of the abuse victim to calculate the IQ of someone who thinks a 29 month jail sentence is suitable punishment for a crime of this nature (bear in mind that in the UK a prisoner usually only serves half of that sentence in jail, in this instance less than 15 months)

Gary Cosgrove and all of his kind should be put to death, and if the state won’t do it, then Ive got no problem with vigilantes who will.

I’ve said it before, anyone who chooses to harm children, has stepped over a line from which there is no returning. Paedophiles cannot be, nor deserve to be rehabilitated, and children deserve better than being put at risk by convicted paedophiles being released back in to society.

Cue the cries of “what if an innocent person is mistakenly targeted by a vigilante mob?”
To that I say, unfortunate as it may be, if it acts as a deterrent to actual child abusing predators, then that’s a risk we should be prepared to accept. A ‘mob’ doing the wrong thing for the right reason, is preferable to a state treating paedophiles (and anyone else who intentionally hurts children) with kid gloves.

Thank fuck you're not in charge. You would be a Trump supporter.

You must be a Kiddie Sniffer Biden supporter. Your TDS is showing.

What an intelligent comeback. Part of a mob, by any chance, .. [Mod edit: no need for name calling]. Don't know what TDS means, Total Disregard of Sexington?

Chad Sexington wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 2:25 pm

Pseudonomdeplume wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 1:48 pm

Chad Sexington wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 1:42 pm

Pseudonomdeplume wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 1:37 pm

Chad Sexington wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 6:38 am

Then divide that number by the age of the abuse victim to calculate the IQ of someone who thinks a 29 month jail sentence is suitable punishment for a crime of this nature (bear in mind that in the UK a prisoner usually only serves half of that sentence in jail, in this instance less than 15 months)

Gary Cosgrove and all of his kind should be put to death, and if the state won’t do it, then Ive got no problem with vigilantes who will.

I’ve said it before, anyone who chooses to harm children, has stepped over a line from which there is no returning. Paedophiles cannot be, nor deserve to be rehabilitated, and children deserve better than being put at risk by convicted paedophiles being released back in to society.

Cue the cries of “what if an innocent person is mistakenly targeted by a vigilante mob?”
To that I say, unfortunate as it may be, if it acts as a deterrent to actual child abusing predators, then that’s a risk we should be prepared to accept. A ‘mob’ doing the wrong thing for the right reason, is preferable to a state treating paedophiles (and anyone else who intentionally hurts children) with kid gloves.

Thank fuck you're not in charge. You would be a Trump supporter.

You must be a Kiddie Sniffer Biden supporter. Your TDS is showing.

What an intelligent comeback. Part of a mob, by any chance, .. [Mod edit: no need for name calling]. Don't know what TDS means, Total Disregard of Sexington?

Don’t talk about intelligence, when your knee jerk reaction to an opinion that differs to your own is to spout “Trump” bullshit.
FYI (for your information) I’m far from being part of a mob, I can get done the things I choose to do fine by myself.

Pseudonomdeplume wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 2:54 pm

Chad Sexington wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 2:25 pm

Pseudonomdeplume wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 1:48 pm

Chad Sexington wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 1:42 pm

Pseudonomdeplume wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 1:37 pm

Thank fuck you're not in charge. You would be a Trump supporter.

You must be a Kiddie Sniffer Biden supporter. Your TDS is showing.

What an intelligent comeback. Part of a mob, by any chance, .. [Mod edit: no need for name calling]. Don't know what TDS means, Total Disregard of Sexington?

Don’t talk about intelligence, when your knee jerk reaction to an opinion that differs to your own is to spout “Trump” bullshit.
FYI (for your information) I’m far from being part of a mob, I can get done the things I choose to do fine by myself.

Anyone condoning violence lacks intelligence and is neanderthalic in their thinking. Particularly violence against the innocent. I don't want to engage anymore however, I will give you the last word, as is the right of the defendant.