U.K. navy to station new vessels in Indo-Pacific for 5 years

Yeah, that place out 'there'. Anything not really Cambodia related should go here.
User avatar
yong
Expatriate
Posts: 4267
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2018 12:03 pm
Reputation: 2769
Thailand

U.K. navy to station new vessels in Indo-Pacific for 5 years

Post by yong »

https://asia.nikkei.com/Editor-s-Picks/ ... 3&si=44594

U.K. navy to station new vessels in Indo-Pacific for 5 years
Adm. Radakin says important to maintain freedom of navigation in Taiwan Strait

Image
The HMS Queen Elizabeth leaves the U.S. naval base at Yokosuka, Japan on Sept. 8. © Kyodo
YUSUKE NAKAJIMA, Nikkei staff writer September 16, 2021 18:03 JST

LONDON -- The U.K. will station two new patrol vessels in the Indo-Pacific region for "at least the next five years" as part of plans by the U.S. and its allies to check China's naval expansion, Tony Radakin, a senior Royal Navy admiral, told Nikkei in a recent interview.

Britain has been strengthening its presence in the region since leaving the European Union, and has already dispatched an aircraft carrier strike group led by the HMS Queen Elizabeth to the region. Concerns include the security of Taiwan.

Radakin said that the Taiwan Strait is clearly "part of the free and open Indo-Pacific."

His comments follow a joint statement from the Group of Seven leaders' summit in the U.K. in June that emphasized for the first time "the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait." He was speaking before the announcement on Wednesday that the U.S., Australia and the U.K. have unveiled a new Indo-Pacific security alliance.

It is "very clear that the Taiwan Strait is international waters," said Radakin. "It is a waterway that can be used by different nations."

He stressed that "this is part of the free and open Indo Pacific, and part of the rules-based order. I think it's been a very clear U.K. position, along with other nations that are signatories to [the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea]."

Radakin did not specifically mention China's moves against Taiwan, but he made clear that it is important to maintain freedom of navigation in the Taiwan Strait.

Earlier this month, the Queen Elizabeth carrier group made a port call at the U.S. military's Yokosuka base in Kanagawa Prefecture.

Radakin said that security cooperation between Japan and the U.K. will become even stronger, noting that the two countries are able to share facilities and equipment, and the armed forces of both countries use the highly advanced F-35 stealth fighter aircraft.

Observers believe two sides are considering closer collaboration, such as using each other's aircraft carriers for flight operations ahead of deployment of the F-35B in Japan.

Image
Adm. Tony Radakin (Photo by Will Haigh)

In a July meeting with Japanese Defense Minister Nobuo Kishi, British counterpart Ben Wallace outlined a plan to station two patrol vessels in the Indo-Pacific region separate from the carrier strike group. The two ships left the U.K. in early September.

Radakin said the additional ships would be in the region for "at least the next five years." He added, "They're smaller ships. We want them to complement the carrier group, which will be in the region for a relatively short period of time."

The ships will also help guard against illegal activities like maritime smuggling, according to the British government.

However, Britain has few military bases in the region and support from friendly nations is essential to make the deployment work. "Over 80% of the time they will be at sea ... [and will make] very short visits to countries in the region ... for logistics and fuel and supplies," said Radakin. "We would look to link with Japan as a friend and ally in the region in the same way as we would with Australia."

However, many still believe there are limits to Britain's military involvement in Asia given the need to respond to threats posed by neighboring Russia. According to the International Institute for Strategic Studies in the U.K., Britain's military spending for fiscal 2020 was $61.5 billion. That is about 20% more than Japan but much less than the U.S. or China. In terms of personnel, British troops deployed in Asia and Oceania, excluding the Middle East, account for about 0.2% of the total strength of the British military.

Asked about this, Radakin replied, "This is not about basing or stationing troops." He noted that the carrier strike group had conducted a series of joint exercises with allies and friendly countries, adding that the U.K. involvement is a chance "to come together to discuss our trading relationship and to support the trade in the region and the free flow of trade."

The U.K. aims to strengthen relations with Asian countries by helping maintain maritime order, including freedom of navigation, in the Asia-Pacific region, while also benefiting from the region's economic growth. Its ongoing negotiations to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership are also a part of this effort.

Regarding future prospects for the Royal Navy, Radakin explained: "We want to have the ships that are operating, much more strongly with Oman, with India, using Diego Garcia and operating down the east coast of Africa."

The U.K.'s presence in the region is "the reality of the Indo Pacific becoming this phenomenal trading hub for the whole world. We're an outward-facing maritime Island trading nation, and therefore we're playing our part in the region with that as a backdrop."

Japan has welcomed the deployment of British patrol vessels, which will enable more joint responses and training among Japan, the U.K. and the U.S.

Tokyo also sees the deployment as a part of a broader international pushback to China's attempts to change the status quo.
User avatar
xandreu
Expatriate
Posts: 1859
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 11:37 am
Reputation: 1931
Great Britain

Re: U.K. navy to station new vessels in Indo-Pacific for 5 years

Post by xandreu »

I've been hearing a lot of talk lately that the Chinese takeover of Taiwan is imminent. Xi Jinping is determined that part of his legacy be that he was the one to finally unify China. There was a CCP party spokesman on BBC Radio 4 yesterday getting extremely irate at the presenter who kept referring to the possibility of it as an invasion or a takeover, when if fact, according to the spokesperson, the correct term is the 'reunification'.

He went on to say that China would never humiliate itself and attempt to take Taiwan if it wasn't absolutely certain that it could do so, and China's confidence in its ability to do so is growing by the day. The only question is whether the US would be prepared to step in to protect Taiwan, something they have often hinted they would do but never explicitly said so.

Buckle up boys. Welcome to Cold War II, the sequel.
The difference between animals and humans is that animals would never allow the dumb ones to lead the pack.
Ahyou!whyme?
Expatriate
Posts: 145
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2021 1:47 am
Reputation: 25
Great Britain

Re: U.K. navy to station new vessels in Indo-Pacific for 5 years

Post by Ahyou!whyme? »

Two British patrol vessels will make those pesky Chinese think twice. :boxing: :director: I BOXING YOU YOU UNDERSTAND
User avatar
bossho
Aging Tweaker
Posts: 622
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 6:03 pm
Reputation: 276
United States of America

Re: U.K. navy to station new vessels in Indo-Pacific for 5 years

Post by bossho »

That 150 km odd stretch betwixt Maintucky China and UncleSam's Free Island China is not getting any less popular, and this 80 year old waterway drama might just unfold within the next couple years.
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: angsta, barang_TK, Big Daikon, Bing [Bot], IraHayes, John Bingham, Ozinasia, Province, Stravaiger, WildAlaskaKen, xandreu and 492 guests