Kenr wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 11:12 pm

Gary Small wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 11:07 pm

Kenr wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 3:36 pm

Whore? Wow.

Would you have preferred he wrote cashier?
He is being honest.

Typical idiotic response. Doing what they need to do to survive and that’s what you refer them as? Shallow judge mental morons.

she was married and her husband kept sending her back to me , i stopped paaying when he wanted a motocycle

pissontheroof wrote: ↑Sat Feb 18, 2023 3:00 pm

Kenr wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 11:12 pm

Gary Small wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 11:07 pm

Kenr wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 3:36 pm

Whore? Wow.

Would you have preferred he wrote cashier?
He is being honest.

Typical idiotic response. Doing what they need to do to survive and that’s what you refer them as? Shallow judge mental morons.

she was married and her husband kept sending her back to me , i stopped paaying when he wanted a motocycle

And? So you were paying for it? LOL. Anyway, what does your post before have to do with the vaccine?

phuketrichard wrote: ↑Sat Feb 18, 2023 9:46 am jump on in nay sayers:

‘Finally’ The Lancet Acknowledges Natural Immunity Superior to mRNA COVID Vaccines
Immunity acquired from past COVID-19 infection provides strong, lasting protection against severe outcomes from the illness at a level “as high if not higher” than that provided by mRNA vaccines, according to a study published Thursday in The Lancet.

Immunity acquired from past COVID-19 infection provides strong, lasting protection against severe outcomes from the illness at a level “as high if not higher” than that provided by mRNA vaccines, according to a study published Thursday in The Lancet.

Researchers conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 65 studies worldwide, providing overwhelming evidence to support what many scientists, doctors and studies have said since early in the COVID-19 pandemic.

“The Lancet is finally acknowledging what doctors and scientists have been gaslit for saying for years — that natural immunity provides superior protection to experimental vaccines,” said Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chairman and chief litigation counsel for Children’s Health Defense.

“Only the tsunami of propaganda and censorship from the pharma/government biosecurity cartel and the controlled media persuaded the public that Pfizer and Moderna were better at protecting the human immune system than God and evolution,” he added.

full report
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defe ... d8764b2871

FYI:
The Lancet is a weekly peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is among the world's oldest and best-known general medical journals.
Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE
Factual Reporting: VERY-HIGH
Country: United Kingdom
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTY FREE
Media Type: Journal
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

I agree there is not much new information in the Covid vaccines debate, but I couldn't let this false-factcheck of PR's pass without comment. So what follows is simply a rebuttal on the post above, and the confusing use of true and false fact-checking.

Here the poster has run a check on the (very serious) medical review "the Lancet", and found that, yes, it is a reputable source. BUT, in this case, the Lancet is being (mis)quoted by a website called childrenshealthdefense.org.in order to authenticate an unsubstantiated report from The Chidren's Health Defense, an organisation which lobbies against vaccines among other things. It is not a factual and unbiased report.
If you factcheck childrenshealthdefense.org, instead of The Lancet, then you get this:

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

Overall, we rate the Children’s Health Defense a strong conspiracy and quackery level advocacy group that frequently promotes unsupported claims. We also rate them low for factual reporting due to the promotion of propaganda and several failed fact checks.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/children ... h-defense/

Wikipedia
Children's Health Defense is an American 501(c)(3) nonprofit activist group mainly known for anti-vaccine propaganda and has been identified as one of the main sources of misinformation on vaccines. Founded under the name World Mercury Project in 2011, it is chaired by Robert F.Kennedy Jr.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children% ... th_Defense