“As American media outlets wrestle with whether or not to publish information being provided by the President's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani and former chief White House strategist Steve Bannon, Sky News Australia, The Daily Telegraph and the Australian have happily broadcast and published their thoughts.” these are all Murdoch outlets, as is the Post.
“So what are these stories about?
“To begin with, it must be noted that the central premise of the stories is false.
Since 2018, Mr Giuliani and Mr Trump have been making the case that Mr Biden acted corruptly during his time as vice-president, accusing him of advocating for the dismissal of a Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating the Ukrainian gas company Burisma, which employed his son, Hunter Biden.” Biden did not act corruptly, this was government policy, and widely called for and applauded in Europe.
“Then, starting at the beginning of 2020, reports emerged that Russian government hackers had gained access to the emails of Hunter Biden, and were planning to release them before the 2020 election, timed to do maximum damage to his father's campaign, in a direct re-running of their 2016 US election interference campaign.”
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-10-23/ ... 0/12801162

Call a spade a spade, at best it’s a rehash of a debunked story, at worst it’s part of years of Russian disinformation and election meddling.
If this story was about his Orangeness, he would call it Fake News, but, as we know fake news only applies to facts Trump doesn’t agree with. Doubleplusgood.

nemo wrote: ↑Fri Oct 23, 2020 9:36 pm Bobulinski
it keeps getting more hilarious



This is supposedly an image of Hunter Biden's Blackberry. One small problem. You can see in the upper left that the cell provider is MTS RUS, a Russian-only cell provider not accessible from anywhere in North America.

OOPS!

That’s a screenshot from an iPhone. I don’t know what that means in this context.
Is it 2009? Who uses a blackberry?

Ask Giuliani

Bwah! If a white south african went into a township and started threatening manners then people would say he had no right to be there and was a bloddy idiot who deserved what he got. Same if a black walked into a white neighborhood with a gun or a knife, maybe some politic bullshit but same result.

Kid should not been there, law says he should not been there. Not his property to defend, not his family or neighbors property to defend. Not self denfense-stupid kid with gun in wrong place at definitely wrong time. Idiot.

Trump Had One Last Story to Sell. The Wall Street Journal Wouldn’t Buy It.

Inside the White House’s secret, last-ditch effort to change the narrative, and the election — and the return of the media gatekeepers.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/25/busi ... trump.html

I can read it fine.
Maybe your generals block it.