Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they’re taking a “step back” from the royal family

Yeah, that place out 'there'. Anything not really Cambodia related should go here.
User avatar
IraHayes
Expatriate
Posts: 2676
Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 7:38 am
Reputation: 2030
Marshall Islands

Re: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they’re taking a “step back” from the royal family

Post by IraHayes »

Doc67 wrote: Sun Nov 21, 2021 8:02 am The search and need for victimhood status is now a national disease. People used to deal with their problems with stoicism and fortitude, now we have a nation full of cry-babies. If that's progress you can keep your progressive society.
People used to deal with their problems with stoicism and fortitude.

Repeating that one line because it defines the disease that is "wokism". We have the society we have ight now, and anyone who thinks life is worse now than it was 50 or 100 years ago is deluded, because we overcame adversity not by crying and whinging and blaming everyone but ourselves but by sheer strength of will and the desire to do better.
User avatar
Doc67
Expatriate
Posts: 8870
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:16 am
Reputation: 8148
Location: PHNOM PENH
Great Britain

Re: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they’re taking a “step back” from the royal family

Post by Doc67 »

nerdlinger wrote: Sun Nov 21, 2021 8:58 am
Doc67 wrote: Sun Nov 21, 2021 8:54 amIf you think you have people like me frightened and on the run, think again.
LOL, that’s the second time in as many posts that you seem to think it somehow brave and unintimidated to post on an anonymous Internet forum.
And that's the second time in as many posts you have made a snide remark calling me a coward. Is it deliberate or can't you help yourself?

Anyway, enjoy your cheap shots on an anonymous forum, I am still waiting for the clips of the hysteria on GBN:

Post a few clips of all this hysteria on GBN about these "quasi-fascist" lefties coming to get me. I enjoy a good laugh.
nerdlinger
Expatriate
Posts: 776
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:56 pm
Reputation: 571
Great Britain

Re: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they’re taking a “step back” from the royal family

Post by nerdlinger »

Doc67 wrote: Sun Nov 21, 2021 9:06 am
nerdlinger wrote: Sun Nov 21, 2021 8:58 am
Doc67 wrote: Sun Nov 21, 2021 8:54 amIf you think you have people like me frightened and on the run, think again.
LOL, that’s the second time in as many posts that you seem to think it somehow brave and unintimidated to post on an anonymous Internet forum.
And that's the second time in as many posts you have made a snide remark calling me a coward. Is it deliberate or can't you help yourself?
Yet again, you’re defending yourself from imaginary attacks. I wasn’t calling you a coward, I was pointing out how delusional it was for you to keep acting like you’re fighting some brave fight against dark forces when literally nobody is coming for you and there is no jeopardy. You’ve spent the whole discussion proving me right.
Chad Sexington
Expatriate
Posts: 1054
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2019 3:43 pm
Reputation: 1343
Great Britain

Re: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they’re taking a “step back” from the royal family

Post by Chad Sexington »

nerdlinger wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 7:03 pm
Chad Sexington wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 6:00 pm Ok, so now we know what news channels people shouldn’t follow, pray tell, which news channel(s) do you recommend for unbiased reporting of facts that is/are free of agenda based opinions?
There is a handy site https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ which rates outlets on both bias and factual accuracy. It can even help you find a news outlet that helps confirm your existing biases without resorting to making shit up, if that’s what you want.

The BBC is always an interesting case because most leftists criticise it for being pro-establishment; see for example the hatchet job they did on Corbyn.
It’s a pretty good indicator that they’re not too biased when all sides complain about bias. What you don’t see them criticised too much for however is inaccuracy - so much so that when a BBC producer does slip up from time to time there’s a massive national hoo-hah with all the other outlets piling on, even though it’ll be over something on the level that a Murdoch rag does literally every day of the year.
Why did I know you would say “the BBC”, talk about predictable.
So, you are claiming the BBC is not biased in favor of the Labour Party (a blind man could see that it clearly is) and your proof is “they did a hatchet job on Corbyn”.
The issues the BBC have with Corbyn are nothing to do with him being (former) leader of the Labour Party, and everything to do with him being openly anti-Semitic and admitting to supporting Hamas (amongst other terrorist organizations), and those facts not sitting well with the people who hold the power at the BBC.
To claim the BBC is unbiased is laughable, show me any episode of Question Time, where both panel and audience isn’t loaded with Labour supporting left wingers (is there any other kind?), better still, show me a single BBC report about Brexit that wasn’t pro remain, and I’ll show you a fucking unicorn.
You’re clearly far left, which is evidenced by you claiming any views/opinions that differ from your own are “right wing propaganda and racist”, so from now on I’m going to ignore you on general principle.
User avatar
Doc67
Expatriate
Posts: 8870
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:16 am
Reputation: 8148
Location: PHNOM PENH
Great Britain

Re: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they’re taking a “step back” from the royal family

Post by Doc67 »

nerdlinger wrote: Sun Nov 21, 2021 9:13 am
Doc67 wrote: Sun Nov 21, 2021 9:06 am
nerdlinger wrote: Sun Nov 21, 2021 8:58 am
Doc67 wrote: Sun Nov 21, 2021 8:54 amIf you think you have people like me frightened and on the run, think again.
LOL, that’s the second time in as many posts that you seem to think it somehow brave and unintimidated to post on an anonymous Internet forum.
And that's the second time in as many posts you have made a snide remark calling me a coward. Is it deliberate or can't you help yourself?
Yet again, you’re defending yourself from imaginary attacks. I wasn’t calling you a coward, I was pointing out how delusional it was for you to keep acting like you’re fighting some brave fight against dark forces when literally nobody is coming for you and there is no jeopardy. You’ve spent the whole discussion proving me right.
The inference was overwhelming, and everyone can see it.

Anyway, the time for talking is over, it's showtime. Where are my clips of all this hysteria on GBN news about the leftie fascist army coming to get me. My popcorn is ready.

And, if you remember correctly, this is what this chat is all about, your dismissal of GBN news and subsequent charges of hysterical pieces.

You can win this argument with just two clips. I am ready to concede. I want to go out for breakfast.
nerdlinger
Expatriate
Posts: 776
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:56 pm
Reputation: 571
Great Britain

Re: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they’re taking a “step back” from the royal family

Post by nerdlinger »

Chad Sexington wrote: Sun Nov 21, 2021 9:16 am Why did I know you would say “the BBC”, talk about predictable.
…because Doc brought the BBC up in the post it was a reply to?
You’re clearly far left, which is evidenced by you claiming any views/opinions that differ from your own are “right wing propaganda and racist”, so from now on I’m going to ignore you on general principle.
I didn’t. I said that Fox and GBN are propaganda. Because they are. If you think that’s such a controversial statement that it merits blocking me then fine, enjoy your bubble.

Nowhere did I even *hint* that people who disagree with me are racist, that’s entirely fabricated in your mind.
Last edited by nerdlinger on Sun Nov 21, 2021 9:30 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Doc67
Expatriate
Posts: 8870
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:16 am
Reputation: 8148
Location: PHNOM PENH
Great Britain

Re: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they’re taking a “step back” from the royal family

Post by Doc67 »

nerdlinger wrote: Sun Nov 21, 2021 9:25 am
Chad Sexington wrote: Sun Nov 21, 2021 9:16 am Why did I know you would say “the BBC”, talk about predictable.
…because Doc brought the BBC up in the post it was a reply to?
This much is true Chad, but here it is in context:

People are sick of the BBC with their woke shite, all the while pretending to be unbiased and paid for by enforced subscription.
nerdlinger
Expatriate
Posts: 776
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:56 pm
Reputation: 571
Great Britain

Re: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they’re taking a “step back” from the royal family

Post by nerdlinger »

Chad Sexington wrote: Sun Nov 21, 2021 9:16 am You’re clearly far left, which is evidenced by you claiming any views/opinions that differ from your own are “right wing propaganda and racist”, so from now on I’m going to ignore you on general principle.
Also, anyone else spotted the irony here? After several pages of people bemoaning the way that Wokeness is about shutting down people you disagree with, the closest thing we’ve seen in the thread to someone being “cancelled” is ole Chad announcing that nerdlinger is to be added to the ignore list for the heterodoxical crime of watching the BBC. You couldn’t make it up. :roll:
User avatar
armchairlawyer
Expatriate
Posts: 2490
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:43 pm
Reputation: 1503
Cambodia

Re: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they’re taking a “step back” from the royal family

Post by armchairlawyer »

<img src="" alt="Come On Reaction GIF by GIPHY News"/>

Of course the BBC bends the facts like a ladyboy's wrist when it wants to promote its agenda. Same with CNN.

Geting back on topic, the wonderful thing about a law case is that it ultimately strips away all that slanted thinking and gets to the crux of the matter. You need the money to pay good lawyers of course but in the Markle case both sides do. And if the judge gets it wrong (as Warby J did when he went wobbly at the knees over Meghan and he believed her lies) then you can appeal to a team of 3 judges. Now new evidence leads to only one conclusion. Meghan has been caught telling the court bare-faced lies. English courts have a funny little tradition of needing to be honest in court cases.

Meghan started all this by suing the Mail for breach of privacy. It is dangerous to sue a major newspaper, they have a way of getting back at you.
Just ask Ian Botham (drug squad raided his house after it was printed that he enjoyed a spliff and he sued for libel). He was prosecuted and convicted.
Or Ian Aitken (also sued for libel and the truth came out - prosecuted for perjury and did time).
Or Jeffrey Archer (same same - also did time for perjury).

I'm looking in my crystal ball. I can see it clearly now. After Meghan skips bail on a perjury rap, an extradition swap deal is done, Meghan for Andrew. Both do time in a foreign country.
User avatar
IraHayes
Expatriate
Posts: 2676
Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 7:38 am
Reputation: 2030
Marshall Islands

Re: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they’re taking a “step back” from the royal family

Post by IraHayes »

nerdlinger wrote: Sun Nov 21, 2021 9:45 am
Chad Sexington wrote: Sun Nov 21, 2021 9:16 am You’re clearly far left, which is evidenced by you claiming any views/opinions that differ from your own are “right wing propaganda and racist”, so from now on I’m going to ignore you on general principle.
Also, anyone else spotted the irony here? After several pages of people bemoaning the way that Wokeness is about shutting down people you disagree with, the closest thing we’ve seen in the thread to someone being “cancelled” is ole Chad announcing that nerdlinger is to be added to the ignore list for the heterodoxical crime of watching the BBC. You couldn’t make it up. :roll:
How is a poster choosing to ignore you the same as “cancelling” you?

To be cancelled on this forum you would need to be banned at the very least. The best way to deal with attention seekers is to ignore them. It works on 2 year olds so probably a good way of dealing with them on here. Replying to them just gives them more air and ignoring them removes the attention they think they so rightly deserve.
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Freightdog, Fridaywithmateo, hanno and 768 guests