Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they’re taking a “step back” from the royal family
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they’re taking a “step back” from the royal family
People used to deal with their problems with stoicism and fortitude.
Repeating that one line because it defines the disease that is "wokism". We have the society we have ight now, and anyone who thinks life is worse now than it was 50 or 100 years ago is deluded, because we overcame adversity not by crying and whinging and blaming everyone but ourselves but by sheer strength of will and the desire to do better.
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they’re taking a “step back” from the royal family
And that's the second time in as many posts you have made a snide remark calling me a coward. Is it deliberate or can't you help yourself?nerdlinger wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 8:58 amLOL, that’s the second time in as many posts that you seem to think it somehow brave and unintimidated to post on an anonymous Internet forum.
Anyway, enjoy your cheap shots on an anonymous forum, I am still waiting for the clips of the hysteria on GBN:
Post a few clips of all this hysteria on GBN about these "quasi-fascist" lefties coming to get me. I enjoy a good laugh.
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 776
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:56 pm
- Reputation: 571
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they’re taking a “step back” from the royal family
Yet again, you’re defending yourself from imaginary attacks. I wasn’t calling you a coward, I was pointing out how delusional it was for you to keep acting like you’re fighting some brave fight against dark forces when literally nobody is coming for you and there is no jeopardy. You’ve spent the whole discussion proving me right.Doc67 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 9:06 amAnd that's the second time in as many posts you have made a snide remark calling me a coward. Is it deliberate or can't you help yourself?nerdlinger wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 8:58 amLOL, that’s the second time in as many posts that you seem to think it somehow brave and unintimidated to post on an anonymous Internet forum.
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2019 3:43 pm
- Reputation: 1343
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they’re taking a “step back” from the royal family
Why did I know you would say “the BBC”, talk about predictable.nerdlinger wrote: ↑Sat Nov 20, 2021 7:03 pmThere is a handy site https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ which rates outlets on both bias and factual accuracy. It can even help you find a news outlet that helps confirm your existing biases without resorting to making shit up, if that’s what you want.Chad Sexington wrote: ↑Sat Nov 20, 2021 6:00 pm Ok, so now we know what news channels people shouldn’t follow, pray tell, which news channel(s) do you recommend for unbiased reporting of facts that is/are free of agenda based opinions?
The BBC is always an interesting case because most leftists criticise it for being pro-establishment; see for example the hatchet job they did on Corbyn.
It’s a pretty good indicator that they’re not too biased when all sides complain about bias. What you don’t see them criticised too much for however is inaccuracy - so much so that when a BBC producer does slip up from time to time there’s a massive national hoo-hah with all the other outlets piling on, even though it’ll be over something on the level that a Murdoch rag does literally every day of the year.
So, you are claiming the BBC is not biased in favor of the Labour Party (a blind man could see that it clearly is) and your proof is “they did a hatchet job on Corbyn”.
The issues the BBC have with Corbyn are nothing to do with him being (former) leader of the Labour Party, and everything to do with him being openly anti-Semitic and admitting to supporting Hamas (amongst other terrorist organizations), and those facts not sitting well with the people who hold the power at the BBC.
To claim the BBC is unbiased is laughable, show me any episode of Question Time, where both panel and audience isn’t loaded with Labour supporting left wingers (is there any other kind?), better still, show me a single BBC report about Brexit that wasn’t pro remain, and I’ll show you a fucking unicorn.
You’re clearly far left, which is evidenced by you claiming any views/opinions that differ from your own are “right wing propaganda and racist”, so from now on I’m going to ignore you on general principle.
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they’re taking a “step back” from the royal family
The inference was overwhelming, and everyone can see it.nerdlinger wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 9:13 amYet again, you’re defending yourself from imaginary attacks. I wasn’t calling you a coward, I was pointing out how delusional it was for you to keep acting like you’re fighting some brave fight against dark forces when literally nobody is coming for you and there is no jeopardy. You’ve spent the whole discussion proving me right.Doc67 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 9:06 amAnd that's the second time in as many posts you have made a snide remark calling me a coward. Is it deliberate or can't you help yourself?nerdlinger wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 8:58 amLOL, that’s the second time in as many posts that you seem to think it somehow brave and unintimidated to post on an anonymous Internet forum.
Anyway, the time for talking is over, it's showtime. Where are my clips of all this hysteria on GBN news about the leftie fascist army coming to get me. My popcorn is ready.
And, if you remember correctly, this is what this chat is all about, your dismissal of GBN news and subsequent charges of hysterical pieces.
You can win this argument with just two clips. I am ready to concede. I want to go out for breakfast.
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 776
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:56 pm
- Reputation: 571
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they’re taking a “step back” from the royal family
…because Doc brought the BBC up in the post it was a reply to?Chad Sexington wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 9:16 am Why did I know you would say “the BBC”, talk about predictable.
I didn’t. I said that Fox and GBN are propaganda. Because they are. If you think that’s such a controversial statement that it merits blocking me then fine, enjoy your bubble.You’re clearly far left, which is evidenced by you claiming any views/opinions that differ from your own are “right wing propaganda and racist”, so from now on I’m going to ignore you on general principle.
Nowhere did I even *hint* that people who disagree with me are racist, that’s entirely fabricated in your mind.
Last edited by nerdlinger on Sun Nov 21, 2021 9:30 am, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they’re taking a “step back” from the royal family
This much is true Chad, but here it is in context:nerdlinger wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 9:25 am…because Doc brought the BBC up in the post it was a reply to?Chad Sexington wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 9:16 am Why did I know you would say “the BBC”, talk about predictable.
People are sick of the BBC with their woke shite, all the while pretending to be unbiased and paid for by enforced subscription.
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 776
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:56 pm
- Reputation: 571
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they’re taking a “step back” from the royal family
Also, anyone else spotted the irony here? After several pages of people bemoaning the way that Wokeness is about shutting down people you disagree with, the closest thing we’ve seen in the thread to someone being “cancelled” is ole Chad announcing that nerdlinger is to be added to the ignore list for the heterodoxical crime of watching the BBC. You couldn’t make it up.Chad Sexington wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 9:16 am You’re clearly far left, which is evidenced by you claiming any views/opinions that differ from your own are “right wing propaganda and racist”, so from now on I’m going to ignore you on general principle.
- armchairlawyer
- Expatriate
- Posts: 2520
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:43 pm
- Reputation: 1518
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they’re taking a “step back” from the royal family
<img src="" alt="Come On Reaction GIF by GIPHY News"/>
Of course the BBC bends the facts like a ladyboy's wrist when it wants to promote its agenda. Same with CNN.
Geting back on topic, the wonderful thing about a law case is that it ultimately strips away all that slanted thinking and gets to the crux of the matter. You need the money to pay good lawyers of course but in the Markle case both sides do. And if the judge gets it wrong (as Warby J did when he went wobbly at the knees over Meghan and he believed her lies) then you can appeal to a team of 3 judges. Now new evidence leads to only one conclusion. Meghan has been caught telling the court bare-faced lies. English courts have a funny little tradition of needing to be honest in court cases.
Meghan started all this by suing the Mail for breach of privacy. It is dangerous to sue a major newspaper, they have a way of getting back at you.
Just ask Ian Botham (drug squad raided his house after it was printed that he enjoyed a spliff and he sued for libel). He was prosecuted and convicted.
Or Ian Aitken (also sued for libel and the truth came out - prosecuted for perjury and did time).
Or Jeffrey Archer (same same - also did time for perjury).
I'm looking in my crystal ball. I can see it clearly now. After Meghan skips bail on a perjury rap, an extradition swap deal is done, Meghan for Andrew. Both do time in a foreign country.
Of course the BBC bends the facts like a ladyboy's wrist when it wants to promote its agenda. Same with CNN.
Geting back on topic, the wonderful thing about a law case is that it ultimately strips away all that slanted thinking and gets to the crux of the matter. You need the money to pay good lawyers of course but in the Markle case both sides do. And if the judge gets it wrong (as Warby J did when he went wobbly at the knees over Meghan and he believed her lies) then you can appeal to a team of 3 judges. Now new evidence leads to only one conclusion. Meghan has been caught telling the court bare-faced lies. English courts have a funny little tradition of needing to be honest in court cases.
Meghan started all this by suing the Mail for breach of privacy. It is dangerous to sue a major newspaper, they have a way of getting back at you.
Just ask Ian Botham (drug squad raided his house after it was printed that he enjoyed a spliff and he sued for libel). He was prosecuted and convicted.
Or Ian Aitken (also sued for libel and the truth came out - prosecuted for perjury and did time).
Or Jeffrey Archer (same same - also did time for perjury).
I'm looking in my crystal ball. I can see it clearly now. After Meghan skips bail on a perjury rap, an extradition swap deal is done, Meghan for Andrew. Both do time in a foreign country.
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced they’re taking a “step back” from the royal family
How is a poster choosing to ignore you the same as “cancelling” you?nerdlinger wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 9:45 amAlso, anyone else spotted the irony here? After several pages of people bemoaning the way that Wokeness is about shutting down people you disagree with, the closest thing we’ve seen in the thread to someone being “cancelled” is ole Chad announcing that nerdlinger is to be added to the ignore list for the heterodoxical crime of watching the BBC. You couldn’t make it up.Chad Sexington wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 9:16 am You’re clearly far left, which is evidenced by you claiming any views/opinions that differ from your own are “right wing propaganda and racist”, so from now on I’m going to ignore you on general principle.
To be cancelled on this forum you would need to be banned at the very least. The best way to deal with attention seekers is to ignore them. It works on 2 year olds so probably a good way of dealing with them on here. Replying to them just gives them more air and ignoring them removes the attention they think they so rightly deserve.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 1632 Views
-
Last post by Clutch Cargo
-
- 34 Replies
- 14313 Views
-
Last post by Pseudonomdeplume
-
- 160 Replies
- 32731 Views
-
Last post by Rossco180
-
- 1 Replies
- 2030 Views
-
Last post by Tarndog
-
- 42 Replies
- 7076 Views
-
Last post by mannanman
-
- 9 Replies
- 1944 Views
-
Last post by nemo
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Big Daikon, ron100 and 860 guests