A post on social media reports that the missing woman has been found. Presumably safe and sound. No details.

Thank goodness.

Now I guess it will be slightly less uncouth of me to say that I'd like to evacuate the contents of my scrotum all over her fantabulous turd-cutter.

She’s certainly a hot tour agent, I like tour leader like this

Who wants to join me at Bass Room? I imagine Brody struggles to even put on pants. We can start at Rokku. I am a member!

Considering most of the idiots that have replied here are, well, lets be charitable and say -old, with no chance of doing anything to her but jerking off over her pictures, this entire thread is sort of creepy.In fact, they are a sick bunch of old perverts. Someone puts out a call for help finding their friend and the responders here put on soft core porn pics of her after stalking her on FB and then talk about giving it to her. Sorry, but WHERE are the moderators here? And WHAT are they moderating? 2 years General, thats it.Thats all this forum has left unless you guys do something about it. I was right with TOF and unless you do something about this bunch of fukn perverts ( the same ones that killed TOF), I will be right here too.
For you YTP!

Hotdigr wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:13 pm Someone puts out a call for help finding their friend and the responders here put on soft core porn pics of her after stalking her on FB ...

Which pics are softcore pornography?


None of the pics on this thread meet my definition of softcore pornography.

prahocalypse now wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:22 pm

Hotdigr wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:13 pm Someone puts out a call for help finding their friend and the responders here put on soft core porn pics of her after stalking her on FB ...

Which pics are softcore pornography?


None of the pics on this thread meet my definition of softcore pornography.

Strawman argument. Not surprising considering you are the worst of a bad bunch. Have you actually been paid to come here and ruin this forum? You were very effective in ruining the other one.

Hotdigr wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:34 pm

prahocalypse now wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:22 pm

Hotdigr wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:13 pm Someone puts out a call for help finding their friend and the responders here put on soft core porn pics of her after stalking her on FB ...

Which pics are softcore pornography?


None of the pics on this thread meet my definition of softcore pornography.

Strawman argument. Not surprising considering you are the worst of a bad bunch. Have you actually been paid to come here and ruin this forum? You were very effective in ruining the other one.

You clearly have no idea what either softcore pornography or strawman arguments are.


Here are a couple of definitions from wikipedia:

Softcore pornography or softcore porn is commercial still photography or film that has a pornographic or erotic component. It is less sexually graphic and intrusive than hardcore pornography. It typically contains nude or semi-nude actors involved in love scenes, and is intended to be sexually arousing and aesthetically beautiful. Softcore pornography may include sexual activity between two people or masturbation...

The pics on this thread do not contain nudity. There are no "love scenes". There are no pics of sexual activity or masturbation.

A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent.

I was refuting an argument that WAS presented by you. You argued that that the thread was "creepy", partly because it contained "soft core porn". I have pointed out that your evidence is flawed. That's not a strawman argument.

Hotdigr wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:34 pm Have you actually been paid to come here and ruin this forum? You were very effective in ruining the other one.

Last week, you said it was vlad and Andy who ruined TOF:

Hotdigr wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:34 pm it looks just like when Vlad and Andy "owned" K440 and everyday when you looked at the posting history for the last 24 hrs, they were the only names you saw. And their comments were generally juvenile, almost infantile, bullshit. It killed that forum.

prahocalypse now wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:50 pm

Hotdigr wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:34 pm

prahocalypse now wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:22 pm

Hotdigr wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:13 pm Someone puts out a call for help finding their friend and the responders here put on soft core porn pics of her after stalking her on FB ...

Which pics are softcore pornography?


None of the pics on this thread meet my definition of softcore pornography.

Strawman argument. Not surprising considering you are the worst of a bad bunch. Have you actually been paid to come here and ruin this forum? You were very effective in ruining the other one.

You clearly have no idea what either softcore pornography or strawman arguments are.


Here are a couple of definitions from wikipedia:

Softcore pornography or softcore porn is commercial still photography or film that has a pornographic or erotic component. It is less sexually graphic and intrusive than hardcore pornography. It typically contains nude or semi-nude actors involved in love scenes, and is intended to be sexually arousing and aesthetically beautiful. Softcore pornography may include sexual activity between two people or masturbation...

The pics on this thread do not contain nudity. There are no "love scenes". There are no pics of sexual activity or masturbation.

A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent.

I was refuting an argument that WAS presented by you. You argued that that the thread was "creepy", partly because it contained "soft core porn". I have pointed out that your evidence is flawed. That's not a strawman argument.

You clearly know how to cherry pick the internet -
Soft core pornography:
adjective
of, relating to, or containing sexually arousing depictions that are not fully explicit:

A strawman argument is a fallacious argument that distorts an opposing stance in order to make it easier to attack. Essentially, the person using the strawman pretends to attack their opponent’s stance, while in reality they are actually attacking a version of that stance which their opponent doesn’t necessarily support.
My "stance" was and is that your post was creepy. You attacked my definition of the phrase "strawman". That is the defintion of a "strawman argument" You distorted my point and attacked a minor point to take peoples attention away from the fact that, in fact your post was simply creepy.
As I couldn't be fukd trying to cut and paste your other quote - I NEVER claimed Andy and Vlad were the ONLY 2 responsible for destroying the other forum. Once again - another "strawman" argument from you trying to take the focus off your own responsibility.
Your post was creepy, even the title shows that. You are a FB creep as shown by the pics you took from her FB page. To forestall you're next strawman argument, don't try to tell me that anything any one posts on FB is open slather for old pervs like you. This was about friends asking for help. Hopefully you don't have a daughter or young sister that will ever be treated this way by some old pervert like you.
You really are to easy mate. Now piss off back to your 2nd grade debating class. I'm done with you because you are to boring to argue with any more