Trumps Legacy
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 776
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:56 pm
- Reputation: 571
Re: Trumps Legacy
I’m not saying there’s nothing of value in there but by and large it’s best to ignore anything RT have to say about pretty much anything, even if it does match up with your preconceptions. Especially if it matches up with your preconceptions.emm wrote: ↑Fri Jan 22, 2021 4:32 pm
But that would be too simple. Here is what 79 % of Americans actually think:
79% of Americans think the US is falling apart. That’s no surprise when one half of the country wants to crush the other
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/512667-us-demo ... ans-trump/
Re: Trumps Legacy
OK, RT is not trustworthy but "The Hill" should be. It's american after all.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... r-BB1cKT7G
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... r-BB1cKT7G
- phuketrichard
- Expatriate
- Posts: 16853
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2014 5:17 pm
- Reputation: 5768
- Location: Atlantis
Re: Trumps Legacy
these kind of polls are pretty much worthless
all depends not only on who you ask, but how you ask
how many of the 1,000 had "make american great" hats on?
all depends not only on who you ask, but how you ask
how many of the 1,000 had "make american great" hats on?
The poll, which included interviews with more than 1,000 adults from Monday to Wednesday, found that most respondents either strongly or somewhat agreed with the statement "America is falling apart."
At the same time, a similar proportion of those surveyed indicated that they are "proud to be an American."
In a nation run by swine, all pigs are upward-mobile and the rest of us are fucked until we can put our acts together: not necessarily to win, but mainly to keep from losing completely. HST
- Big Daikon
- Expatriate
- Posts: 3184
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:07 am
- Reputation: 2602
Re: Trumps Legacy
I know! How hard is it to build a wall?nerdlinger wrote: ↑Fri Jan 22, 2021 5:15 pmThat’s what really perplexes me about the fanaticism of his supporters - he hasn’t even been successful on his own terms. If your definition of a successful President is one that abolished Obamacare, built a wall across the whole Mexican border, brought back a flourishing coal industry, deported all illegal immigrants, and ended birthright citizenship, he’s still a total failure - and that’s with the benefit of two years of a Republican majority in both houses.Big Daikon wrote: ↑Fri Jan 22, 2021 11:27 am Nah, Trump will be remembered for awhile. He has become a Satan for some. Crazy thing is he didn't accomplish that much in four years.
- Ghostwriter
- Expatriate
- Posts: 3123
- Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2019 2:01 am
- Reputation: 2008
Re: Trumps Legacy
The "Covfefe" mysterious mystery.
Still no clue.
Still no clue.
- Freightdog
- Expatriate
- Posts: 4376
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2018 8:41 am
- Reputation: 3470
- Location: Attached to a suitcase between realities
Re: Trumps Legacy
I don’t know. He’s mobilised some of the masses against what they* consider an unjust government. Briefly. Albeit one of which he was the head....Crazy thing is he didn't accomplish that much in four years
Not since Washington’s days has that happened. Sort of.
Next, he’ll have his head emblazoned across the new $200 bill, with a swanky image of one of his golf clubhouses on the back.
Viva the confederate states of trump.
*the not so silent minority, unless you let them do the count, in which case they wuz robbed!
Re: Trumps Legacy
But he hasn’t even accomplished those horrible crimes against humanity. He says he has, he hasn’t.nerdlinger wrote: ↑Fri Jan 22, 2021 5:15 pmThat’s what really perplexes me about the fanaticism of his supporters - he hasn’t even been successful on his own terms. If your definition of a successful President is one that abolished Obamacare, built a wall across the whole Mexican border, brought back a flourishing coal industry, deported all illegal immigrants, and ended birthright citizenship, he’s still a total failure - and that’s with the benefit of two years of a Republican majority in both houses.Big Daikon wrote: ↑Fri Jan 22, 2021 11:27 am Nah, Trump will be remembered for awhile. He has become a Satan for some. Crazy thing is he didn't accomplish that much in four years.
The affordable care act still exists, if in diminished form. Anyone who argues against universal healthcare should have their reproductive rights taken away. If you’re American and you’re against this, just remember that you pay more than anyone else on the planet for healthcare, and yet you’re not in the top ten for quality, or life expectancy.
The border wall, we didn’t need it, strangely enough Mexico didn’t pay for it, and it amounted to “his administration has built just 47 miles of new wall along the border in places where no barrier had existed before”.
Biden has already rolled back some of the coal bullshit, which was a combo of tax breaks for the wealthy and pork barrel, a sure fire way of supporting your base.
There’s still plenty of illegal immigrants, they mostly do jobs Americans are not willing to do, or at wages that would be illegal if they themselves were legal.
I support a refugee from El Salvador, she has been repeatedly raped, all of her family has been murdered. All because of Reagan’s destabilizing policies from decades ago.
Study after study shows new immigrants (illegal or not) are a net positive.
This divisive, and frankly racist shit is what’s tearing America apart.
up to you...
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2019 3:43 pm
- Reputation: 1343
Re: Trumps Legacy
He may have accomplished a bit more if he had not spent the majority of his tenure defending himself against spurious accusations of Russian collusion etc. or he may have screwed up more, who knows?Big Daikon wrote: ↑Fri Jan 22, 2021 11:27 am Nah, Trump will be remembered for awhile. He has become a Satan for some. Crazy thing is he didn't accomplish that much in four years.
But, whether Republican or a Democrat you have to hope that a precedent has not been established whereby subsequent sitting presidents have to suffer the same treatment, in that all it takes is for the opposition party to make a few unfounded accusations to completely derail the president’s work. If this does turn into a Tit for Tat routine it will be the worse for all Americans.
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 776
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:56 pm
- Reputation: 571
Re: Trumps Legacy
What complete and utter rot. The sum total of his time he was required to spend defending himself was the few hours it took him to fill in the written questions from the senate because he wouldn't even submit to being questioned in person. Any time over and above he spent defending himself was ranting unnecessarily on Twitter.Chad Sexington wrote: ↑Fri Jan 22, 2021 8:19 pm He may have accomplished a bit more if he had not spent the majority of his tenure defending himself against spurious accusations of Russian collusion etc. or he may have screwed up more, who knows?
But, whether Republican or a Democrat you have to hope that a precedent has not been established whereby subsequent sitting presidents have to suffer the same treatment, in that all it takes is for the opposition party to make a few unfounded accusations to completely derail the president’s work. If this does turn into a Tit for Tat routine it will be the worse for all Americans.
If his four years were all occupied with collusion allegations that's entirely down to his own poor time management skills.
(and that's completely ignoring the fact that the accusations were absolutely not spurious at all, even the Senators that voted to acquit him did so citing reasons other than his actual innocence...)
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 776
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:56 pm
- Reputation: 571
Re: Trumps Legacy
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-hill/emm wrote: ↑Fri Jan 22, 2021 6:06 pm OK, RT is not trustworthy but "The Hill" should be. It's american after all.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... r-BB1cKT7G
Bias: "Least Bias"
Factual Reporting: "Mostly Factual" (4 out of 7)
Summary: "Overall, we rate The Hill Least Biased based on editorial positions that are currently balanced and news reporting that is low biased. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting, rather than High, due to previous opinion columns promoting unproven claims."
So yeah, not too bad, could be better, but I can live with it.
(FWIW: rt.com is rated there as "Very Low" on Factual (1 out of 7) and somewhere between "Right-Center" and "Right" on bias. Their summary is: "Overall, we rate RT Questionable based on promoting pro-Russian propaganda, promotion of conspiracy theories, numerous failed fact checks, and a lack of author transparency.")
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 22 Replies
- 4246 Views
-
Last post by pissontheroof
-
- 5 Replies
- 2482 Views
-
Last post by SternAAlbifrons
-
- 0 Replies
- 740 Views
-
Last post by yong
-
- 0 Replies
- 1272 Views
-
Last post by CEOCambodiaNews
-
- 0 Replies
- 658 Views
-
Last post by Jerry Atrick
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 329 guests