Soi Dog wrote:

Exactly! A fine old British tradition.

A new kind of sit-in:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/ho ... 22120.html
...

Whether or not, under the law being protested against, the photographers and cameramen were acting illegally was a point of discussion amongst onlookers. Fortunately, the obscenity lawyer Miles Jackman was on hand to clarify. “No, the activity is legal, but representations of the activity may not be legal,” he explained. “If there is any public nudity, it may be a separate offence.”

His position on the legislation was clear. “What is ridiculous is that our laws are criminalising the representation of activities that are legal to perform. If it’s legal to do it, why can’t it be watched?” he said. “This is, without a doubt, the first step in a concerted campaign for internet censorship and control by the state.”

...

So, is it legal to look at these photos on-line in the UK ?

Guess David Cameron will only rest, when porn is totally forbidden in the UK. When his name pops up, it's always related to something with porn. Like one of those protesters said ‘Can’t make his woman get an orgasm, bans it in the whole UK’. And doesn't this law go against equal rights? David prolly thought that chicks who had a squirting orgasm were pissing

Anyways, it doesn't look like they'll block free porn tube sites. Sites like mofosex, http://theporndude.com/, madthumbs,… can just do business like usual. Basically, the UK government is saying 'FY' to the porn shooters and they're making the piracy sites even bigger.

I assume a VPN can easily bypass any kind of block anyway, if something like thepiratebay happens.

I wonder how those porn companies are still making cash? Only a retard would still pay for it.

General Mackevili wrote:I would have at least assumed the prices would be way down by now.

Don't you get a bulk discount?