Please explain ?

Yeah, that place out 'there'. Anything not really Cambodia related should go here.
Tootsfriend
Expatriate
Posts: 1212
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2020 9:36 am
Reputation: 527
Australia

Please explain ?

Post by Tootsfriend »

Why paintings of Adam and Eve are shown with ''Belly Button'' = Navel

User avatar
xandreu
Expatriate
Posts: 1874
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 11:37 am
Reputation: 1951
Great Britain

Re: Please explain ?

Post by xandreu »

Occam's Razor: The simplest explanation is most likely the correct one.

As there was no Adam and Eve, the painter clearly didn't consider the fact that they were supposedly the first humans, and therefore simply forgot not to add a navel.
The difference between animals and humans is that animals would never allow the dumb ones to lead the pack.
User avatar
John Bingham
Expatriate
Posts: 13784
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2014 11:26 pm
Reputation: 8983
Cambodia

Re: Please explain ?

Post by John Bingham »

You should first please explain how Adam and Eve managed to have grandchildren without incest being involved.

Here's one of the explanations that came up when I did loads of academic-style research:
The early chapters of Genesis are concerned with the origin of the Earth and all life, including man. The Author’s intention is seemingly to present the grand picture first and then add certain details throughout the rest of Scripture; this is called Progressive Revelation. All we are told about Adam’s offspring is that the first son was named Cain, the second son named Abel [Genesis 4:1-2 ], then after Abel’s murder, another son named Seth was “begotten when Adam was 130 years old.” After that, Adam “begot sons and daughters” [Genesis 5:3-4]. This same passage also tells us that Adam lived for 930 years [Genesis 5:5]. Therefore, according to Scripture, Adam and Eve’s family consisted of sons Cain, Abel and Seth, plus a minimum of two other sons and two daughters, giving a total of seven children. However, accepting that Adam, and likely Eve, lived for 930 years, seven children would be the minimum number, but does this seem reasonable?

Genesis chapter five presents the genealogies of the descendants of Adam where we are simply given the father’s name, his age when he “begot” the first son and the total number of years he lived. With the exception of Enoch, all of these pre-flood descendants of Adam lived a minimum of 777 years, while most were over 900 years. In each instance, the record simply gives the name of the first son, then adds “and begot sons and daughters.” With these words, the minimum number of children per family then becomes five. But is this really a credible number?

Living over 900 years means living ten times longer than we do today. Proportionately, the female period of fecundity – today 30 to 35 years – would then be about 350 years. At a rate of only one child every seven years, this would result in 50 children for Adam’s immediate family. Interestingly, two ancient books written about the time of Christ but not having the authority of inspired Scripture confirm these figures. The Book of Jubilees, whose author is unknown, was written in the second century B.C. and states that Adam and Eve were in the Garden of Paradise seven years [p.49]. Then Eve gave birth to her first child, Cain, between the ages of 64-70, or the same numbers as the age of the Earth, anno mundi. Eve’s second child, Abel, was born seven years later – between the years 71-77 anno mundi [p.51]. The total number of Adam’s children is not given in this work; however, it is found as a footnote in The Works of Josephus where it states: “The number of Adam’s children, as says the old tradition, was 33 sons and 23 daughters.” In view of their longevity, these appear to be reasonable figures while it would have to be said that, sinners though they were, Adam and Eve had faithfully obeyed God’s first commission to: “be fruitful and multiply …” [Genesis 1:28].
:?
Silence, exile, and cunning.
User avatar
Roryborealis
Expatriate
Posts: 469
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 10:05 pm
Reputation: 144

Re: Please explain ?

Post by Roryborealis »

If it is true that man is made in God's image, then that belly button leads back up to Him.
And His belly button goes right back down to Us. Who invented whom?
As above, so below.

On the other hand, they say 1 in 200 people worldwide are descended from Genghis Khan. That guy was a sex machine.
Tootsfriend
Expatriate
Posts: 1212
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2020 9:36 am
Reputation: 527
Australia

Re: Please explain ?

Post by Tootsfriend »

I was at a Pagan Party celebrating yesterday and I was the only Barang there.

Please explain why ?
ressl
Expatriate
Posts: 338
Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2019 8:07 pm
Reputation: 155
Contact:
Germany

Re: Please explain ?

Post by ressl »

The whole story is full of inconsistencies, he next thing would be when Cain murdered his brother, he fled and went to a village. Dumb question: where does a village and especially the villagers come from?
But I guess it is not the point of fairytales to be logic..
Driving on Cambodian roads is just like playing a classic arcade top scroller. The only difference is a force feedback controller, the limitation to only one life and the inability to restart, once Game Over
User avatar
Roryborealis
Expatriate
Posts: 469
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 10:05 pm
Reputation: 144

Re: Please explain ?

Post by Roryborealis »

Tootsfriend wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:47 am I was at a Pagan Party celebrating yesterday and I was the only Barang there.

Please explain why ?
Pagan Party?

Image
User avatar
Random Dude
Expatriate
Posts: 1034
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2021 5:54 am
Reputation: 1143

Re: Please explain ?

Post by Random Dude »

ressl wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:54 am The whole story is full of inconsistencies, he next thing would be when Cain murdered his brother, he fled and went to a village. Dumb question: where does a village and especially the villagers come from?
But I guess it is not the point of fairytales to be logic..
Not that I've ever believed much of anything the bible says, but if I was ever on the fence trying to decide if it was the gospel truth or a load of bollocks the story of Noah's ark would be the deciding factor.

Sending a raft to Australia to catch and bring back a couple of kangaroos and a crapload of lethal stingy, bitey things must have been a hell of a job. The trip to the poles to grab polar bears and penguins would have been a challenge too.
stevenjb
Expatriate
Posts: 310
Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 2:09 pm
Reputation: 64
Location: USA
United States of America

Re: Please explain ?

Post by stevenjb »

Random Dude wrote:
Sending a raft to Australia to catch and bring back a couple of kangaroos and a crapload of lethal stingy, bitey things must have been a hell of a job. The trip to the poles to grab polar bears and penguins would have been a challenge too.
That means that those animals will have incestuous offspring. That would be great for the gene line.
User avatar
Random Dude
Expatriate
Posts: 1034
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2021 5:54 am
Reputation: 1143

Re: Please explain ?

Post by Random Dude »

stevenjb wrote: Sat Mar 23, 2024 1:52 am
Random Dude wrote:
Sending a raft to Australia to catch and bring back a couple of kangaroos and a crapload of lethal stingy, bitey things must have been a hell of a job. The trip to the poles to grab polar bears and penguins would have been a challenge too.
That means that those animals will have incestuous offspring. That would be great for the gene line.
Incest could explain animals like the platypus...




Image

or the echidnas, those things have a huge 4 headed penis that looks like a foot. Maybe there is something to the Noah's ark story.
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], SINUS and 576 guests