Muslim Mayor of London

Anchor Moy · Post by **Anchor Moy** » Mon May 09, 2016 4:05 pm

http://www.theguardian.com/graphic/0,58 ... 03,00.html
OMG, too many Irish .

ot mien kampf · Post by **ot mien kampf** » Mon May 09, 2016 6:07 pm

cptrelentless wrote:
ot mien kampf wrote:Yeah, Khan's campaign wasn't divisive was it?

Oh yeah. But it's only bad when it's against Muslims.

Besides, London is already less than 50% native Englishmen, no wonder they elected their own. Might as well cheer a Muslim winning in Pakistan. Still waiting for a Christian to win there.

Enjoy more cultural enrichment like this.

The fact that it is less than 50% white British (think it's 46%) does not make them the minority, maths wizard. It still makes them the majority until one of the others gets to more than 46%. Which is a long way off.
Here's an ethnicity map (sorry it's the Graun):
http://www.theguardian.com/graphic/0,58 ... 03,00.html

You tried to correct me and were still wrong.

That would be a plurality.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plurality_%28voting%29

http://www.ontheissues.org/AskMe/plurality.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority

A majority is the greater part, or more than half, of the total. It is a subset of a set consisting of more than half of the set's elements.

Love it when you so called tolerant people come in and make yourselves look like idiots trying to prove how ignorant the people you disagree with are.

cptrelentless · Post by **cptrelentless** » Tue May 10, 2016 6:30 pm

ot mien kampf wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority

A majority is the greater part, or more than half, of the total. It is a subset of a set consisting of more than half of the set's elements.
Love it when you so called tolerant people come in and make yourselves look like idiots trying to prove how ignorant the people you disagree with are.

Key words here: "The greater part". 54% of London is made up of approximately 100 different races. They are all significantly less, individually, so white British is the majority ethnic group.

ot mien kampf · Post by **ot mien kampf** » Tue May 10, 2016 6:33 pm

cptrelentless wrote:
ot mien kampf wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority

A majority is the greater part, or more than half, of the total. It is a subset of a set consisting of more than half of the set's elements.
Love it when you so called tolerant people come in and make yourselves look like idiots trying to prove how ignorant the people you disagree with are.
Key words here: "The greater part". 54% of London is made up of approximately 100 different races. They are all significantly less, individually, so white British is the majority ethnic group.

No the key words are the rest of the definition.

You were wrong. Accept it.

cptrelentless · Post by **cptrelentless** » Tue May 10, 2016 7:02 pm

ot mien kampf wrote:
cptrelentless wrote:
ot mien kampf wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority

A majority is the greater part, or more than half, of the total. It is a subset of a set consisting of more than half of the set's elements.
Love it when you so called tolerant people come in and make yourselves look like idiots trying to prove how ignorant the people you disagree with are.
Key words here: "The greater part". 54% of London is made up of approximately 100 different races. They are all significantly less, individually, so white British is the majority ethnic group.
No the key words are the rest of the definition.

You were wrong. Accept it.

You are definitely German. I will not use majority, I will use "the significantly biggest ethnic group by far" if you admit the statement "they elect their own" is a fallacy, considering there are only 607,083 muslims in London. Out of over 8 million. There's half a million Indians who would sooner saw their arms off than vote for a muslim, same as the 400,000 non-African blacks.

mammothboy2 · Post by **mammothboy2** » Tue May 10, 2016 7:25 pm

Saudi Arabia does NOT have birthright citizenship (as the USA has)

My daughter was born in Taif, registered as British (at the UK Embassy, then still in Jeddah) and later - voluntarily on her part - became Irish.

Actually, KSA's first Ambassador at the UN, Jamil Baroody, was a Lebanese of Christian antecedents who was (it is said) denied
formal Saudi citizenship unless he converted to Islam

ot mien kampf · Post by **ot mien kampf** » Tue May 10, 2016 7:33 pm

cptrelentless wrote:
ot mien kampf wrote:
cptrelentless wrote:
ot mien kampf wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority

A majority is the greater part, or more than half, of the total. It is a subset of a set consisting of more than half of the set's elements.
Love it when you so called tolerant people come in and make yourselves look like idiots trying to prove how ignorant the people you disagree with are.
Key words here: "The greater part". 54% of London is made up of approximately 100 different races. They are all significantly less, individually, so white British is the majority ethnic group.
No the key words are the rest of the definition.

You were wrong. Accept it.
You are definitely German. I will not use majority, I will use "the significantly biggest ethnic group by far" if you admit the statement "they elect their own" is a fallacy, considering there are only 607,083 muslims in London. Out of over 8 million. There's half a million Indians who would sooner saw their arms off than vote for a muslim, same as the 400,000 non-African blacks.

What the hell are you on about?

All I said was that more than 50% of London are now not white Englishmen so they aren't a majority any more, of course they'll elect someone else - usually a Muslim because they're the most aggressively political of any non-European religion.

You then had a cry about me "misuse" of the word majority, even though it was completely correct and you were wrong.

As far as I'm concerned, this is nothing to celebrate because Islam is just Arab colonialism that forces Arab traditions on anyone who converts - like hijabs on Khmer women and Arab-style mosque architecture on Cambodian soil. You're just witnessing people from an already colonized state (Pakistan was Hindu, the name Hindu comes from the Indus valley in Pakistan) spreading Islamic imperialism in the UK.

John Bingham · Post by **John Bingham** » Tue May 10, 2016 8:26 pm

ot mien kampf wrote: All I said was that more than 50% of London are now not white Englishmen so they aren't a majority any more, of course they'll elect someone else - usually a Muslim because they're the most aggressively political of any non-European religion.

And let's not forget that a whole lot of the property in London is now foreign owned (Saudi, UAE, Pakistan, Brunei, Sudan, Russia, Nigeria, etc), which has made the city increasingly unaffordable for the natives. I wonder who could have sold off all these properties?

http://uk.businessinsider.com/london-ma ... ers-2015-9

Here's an interesting article drawn from the Panama Papers which gives some details on the foreigners who have used off-shore companies to buy the country from under your feet. I think it's totally shameful that any country would allow such a wonderful capital to be bought up like that, and as you can see much of it is dirty money from corrupt dictators.

http://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/ap ... ty-empires

cptrelentless · Post by **cptrelentless** » Tue May 10, 2016 8:30 pm

ot mien kampf wrote: What the hell are you on about?

All I said was that more than 50% of London are now not white Englishmen so they aren't a majority any more, of course they'll elect someone else - usually a Muslim because they're the most aggressively political of any non-European religion.

That's where I am saying you are incorrect. Look at the London Assembly members, which are generally ethnically representative of their Burroughs:

Barnet and Camden: Andrew Hartley Dismore, Labour Party
Bexley and Bromley: Gareth Andrew Bacon, The Conservative Party Candidate
Brent and Harrow: Navin Shah, Labour Party
City and East: Unmesh Desai, Labour Party
Croydon and Sutton: Stephen John O'Connell, The Conservative Party Candidate
Ealing and Hillingdon: Onkar Singh Sahota, Labour Party
Enfield and Haringey: Joanne McCartney, Labour Party
Greenwich and Lewisham: Len Duvall, Labour Party
Havering and Redbridge: Keith Anthony Prince, The Conservative Party Candidate
Lambeth and Southwark: Florence Eshalomi, Labour Party
Merton and Wandsworth: Leonie Alison Cooper, Labour Party
North East: Jennette Arnold, Labour Party
South West: Tony Arbour, The Conservative Party Candidate
West Central: Tony Devenish, The Conservative Party Candidate

https://www.londonelects.org.uk/im-vote ... sults-2016

Four Minorities in that list, two Indians from West London - not Muslims, a black woman - no Nigerian capes going on so unlikely Muslim, a potential muslim and a load of white people.

I can't tell what Unmesh's religion is, he doesn't seem to mention it, but he's VP of the East London Rugby Club and a trustee for the Irons. And his constituency covers Barking and Dagenham, where the BNP people hang out. The only likely Muslim.
https://www.london.gov.uk/people/assembly/unmesh-desai

Nobody votes for Wahhabists in London.

John Bingham · Post by **John Bingham** » Tue May 10, 2016 8:49 pm

Here's an interesting bunch of stats from the UK government site:

A whole lot of numbers, but you can easily see how White Brits are still the vast majority, as in about 40 times more than the next (very mixed) group.

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov. ... 407038.pdf

Muslim Mayor of London

Re: Muslim Mayor of London

Re: MUSLIM MAYOR OF LONDON

Re: MUSLIM MAYOR OF LONDON

Re: MUSLIM MAYOR OF LONDON

Re: MUSLIM MAYOR OF LONDON

Re: Muslim Mayor of London

Re: MUSLIM MAYOR OF LONDON

Re: MUSLIM MAYOR OF LONDON

Re: MUSLIM MAYOR OF LONDON

Re: Muslim Mayor of London

Who is online

Register/Login to CEO with your Social Media Account: