China owDebunking Nature magazine's “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” claiming COVID-19 definitely wasn’t fro
China owDebunking Nature magazine's “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” claiming COVID-19 definitely wasn’t fro
China owns Nature magazine’s ass – Debunking “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” claiming COVID-19 definitely wasn’t from a lab
Posted on March 19, 2020
by harvard2thebighouse
Maybe you shouldn’t blindly believe everything you read? Even if the source has a pretty solid reputation?
Nature magazine has censored over 1,000 articles at the request of the Chinese government over the past several years. And it seems pretty clear that their recent article, “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” is just one more example of their influence. China bought off the head of Harvard’s chemistry department, you don’t think they could buy off run-of-the-mill research scientists scrambling for tenure and funding and publication? It’s absolutely horrific that so many scientists and researchers are taking part in what’s really clearly a disinformation campaign orchestrated by the Chinese Communist Party, and willfully spreading a smokescreen about something that’s already killed thousands and is projected to kill millions more across the planet.
https://harvardtothebighouse.com/2020/0 ... rom-a-lab/
Posted on March 19, 2020
by harvard2thebighouse
Maybe you shouldn’t blindly believe everything you read? Even if the source has a pretty solid reputation?
Nature magazine has censored over 1,000 articles at the request of the Chinese government over the past several years. And it seems pretty clear that their recent article, “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” is just one more example of their influence. China bought off the head of Harvard’s chemistry department, you don’t think they could buy off run-of-the-mill research scientists scrambling for tenure and funding and publication? It’s absolutely horrific that so many scientists and researchers are taking part in what’s really clearly a disinformation campaign orchestrated by the Chinese Communist Party, and willfully spreading a smokescreen about something that’s already killed thousands and is projected to kill millions more across the planet.
https://harvardtothebighouse.com/2020/0 ... rom-a-lab/
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 10:02 pm
- Reputation: 12
Re: China owDebunking Nature magazine's “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” claiming COVID-19 definitely wasn’t fro
So, Big'n, does that mean that you agree with the story that this was an american
military bio-resource that China paid for ?
Like you mention the Harvard guy that had access to the pathogen and supposedly knew
how to safely keep it stored in the lab in china that he was paid to set up.
Or did the americans "seed" this bio-weapon, knowing that the "lab" would leak like a sieve?
military bio-resource that China paid for ?
Like you mention the Harvard guy that had access to the pathogen and supposedly knew
how to safely keep it stored in the lab in china that he was paid to set up.
Or did the americans "seed" this bio-weapon, knowing that the "lab" would leak like a sieve?
- SternAAlbifrons
- Expatriate
- Posts: 5752
- Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2019 11:31 am
- Reputation: 3424
- Location: Gilligan's Island
Re: China owDebunking Nature magazine's “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” claiming COVID-19 definitely wasn’t fro
Nature is a British multidisciplinary scientific journal.
It is one of the most recognizable scientific journals in the world.
it was ranked the world's most cited scientific journal by the Science Edition of the 2018 Journal Citation Reports
and is universally recognised as one of the world's top academic journals. Since 1868.
Your reliability when it comes to science is almost always zero Big N.
As is your quoted source - written in a prison cell apparently. The Big House
reads that way too - just crapulous.
Springer Nature was formed in 2015 by the merger of Nature Publishing Group, (not ^^ Nature scientific journal) Palgrave Macmillan and Macmillan Education
A commercial publisher that no way resembles Nature scientific journal.
- and even they did not really censor anything
They did what many corporations do, as a commercial decision - acceded to China's demands that some 1000 China/Taiwn/Hong Kong related articles on their website not be available within China - related mostly to politics and society. Not science.
not Nature either
It is one of the most recognizable scientific journals in the world.
it was ranked the world's most cited scientific journal by the Science Edition of the 2018 Journal Citation Reports
and is universally recognised as one of the world's top academic journals. Since 1868.
Your reliability when it comes to science is almost always zero Big N.
As is your quoted source - written in a prison cell apparently. The Big House
reads that way too - just crapulous.
Springer Nature was formed in 2015 by the merger of Nature Publishing Group, (not ^^ Nature scientific journal) Palgrave Macmillan and Macmillan Education
A commercial publisher that no way resembles Nature scientific journal.
- and even they did not really censor anything
They did what many corporations do, as a commercial decision - acceded to China's demands that some 1000 China/Taiwn/Hong Kong related articles on their website not be available within China - related mostly to politics and society. Not science.
not Nature either
Last edited by SternAAlbifrons on Sun Mar 22, 2020 12:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- tightenupvolume1
- Expatriate
- Posts: 2059
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 10:29 pm
- Reputation: 880
- Location: london
Re: China owDebunking Nature magazine's “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” claiming COVID-19 definitely wasn’t fro
So thousands of scientists all over the world are in on the cover up ? Was "SPANISH FLU, SARS, MERS, EBOLA, ZIKA, FOOT AND MOUTH,SWINE FEVER, and various other virus type outbreaks that happen all over the world from time to time also government plots ? How about run of the mill everyday flu that kills thousands in europe every year, or maybe cancer, TB, the common cold, all government plots ?
Re: China owDebunking Nature magazine's “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” claiming COVID-19 definitely wasn’t fro
im for total freedom of information, no democracy should censor it in cases like this
but america is busy trying to extradite assange for revealing war crimes, they can't really talk
don't like any politician including trump but i think when he called it a chines evirus he was referring to country origin, so he was right
but america is busy trying to extradite assange for revealing war crimes, they can't really talk
don't like any politician including trump but i think when he called it a chines evirus he was referring to country origin, so he was right
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 10:02 pm
- Reputation: 12
Re: China owDebunking Nature magazine's “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” claiming COVID-19 definitely wasn’t fro
Wait!
Wasn't "Spanish Flu" from kansas or nebraska?
So it was really "American Flu"?
Wasn't "Spanish Flu" from kansas or nebraska?
So it was really "American Flu"?
- tightenupvolume1
- Expatriate
- Posts: 2059
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 10:29 pm
- Reputation: 880
- Location: london
Re: China owDebunking Nature magazine's “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” claiming COVID-19 definitely wasn’t fro
Nobody knows for sure that it started in Spain.
(It probably escaped from a secret government lab somewhere, all these things do)
(It probably escaped from a secret government lab somewhere, all these things do)
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 10:02 pm
- Reputation: 12
Re: China owDebunking Nature magazine's “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” claiming COVID-19 definitely wasn’t fro
No no no, Tighty,
I am saying that I KNOW that it did not originate in Spain.
Care to educate yourself? Call google.
I am saying that I KNOW that it did not originate in Spain.
Care to educate yourself? Call google.
- tightenupvolume1
- Expatriate
- Posts: 2059
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 10:29 pm
- Reputation: 880
- Location: london
Re: China owDebunking Nature magazine's “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” claiming COVID-19 definitely wasn’t fro
If you had called google like i did then you would not have posted that ? as you would have seen nobody is sure where it originated
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 10:02 pm
- Reputation: 12
Re: China owDebunking Nature magazine's “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” claiming COVID-19 definitely wasn’t fro
So, Tighty, would that make it much like the current epidemic?
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 746 Views
-
Last post by ali baba
-
- 7 Replies
- 1701 Views
-
Last post by yong
-
- 1 Replies
- 1599 Views
-
Last post by yong
-
- 14 Replies
- 8930 Views
-
Last post by John Bingham
-
- 18 Replies
- 4372 Views
-
Last post by techietraveller84
-
- 0 Replies
- 581 Views
-
Last post by phuketrichard
-
- 3 Replies
- 1466 Views
-
Last post by Stiliko
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Big Daikon, Doc67, Roryborealis and 870 guests