High Tech Chicks
Re: High Tech Chicks
I just watched it again. What a load of bollocks.
It's obviously intersected with animated CGI faces! lol.
Also, not sure if anyone has even watched it but at 2.33 he says "equilavent" instead of equivalent! I stopped listening after that, and I just happened to come across it as I was fast forwarding.
Utter nonsense clickbait dross.
It's obviously intersected with animated CGI faces! lol.
Also, not sure if anyone has even watched it but at 2.33 he says "equilavent" instead of equivalent! I stopped listening after that, and I just happened to come across it as I was fast forwarding.
Utter nonsense clickbait dross.
- Born-Confused
- Expatriate
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Tue May 20, 2014 9:29 am
- Reputation: 71
Re: High Tech Chicks
You do realise who the OP is, so should be no surprise.YaTingPom wrote: ↑Thu Feb 15, 2024 8:41 am I just watched it again. What a load of bollocks.
It's obviously intersected with animated CGI faces! lol.
Also, not sure if anyone has even watched it but at 2.33 he says "equilavent" instead of equivalent! I stopped listening after that, and I just happened to come across it as I was fast forwarding.
Utter nonsense clickbait dross.
Re: High Tech Chicks
If one is going to discuss a topic, one should at least be knowledgeable or open to learning about said topic.
The willingness of some people to remain ignorant when a simple Google Search and a minute reading would bring them up to speed with something they aren't sure about in a discussion they are taking part in is astounding.
Re: High Tech Chicks
I think that is the point I was making. People are too quick to take things at face value, like this click baitey video. Plus you have failed to even answer any of my questions, so off you pop to Google, but I warn you I have a BsC hons in computer science so I do know a little but about this subject.IraHayes wrote: ↑Thu Feb 15, 2024 9:48 amIf one is going to discuss a topic, one should at least be knowledgeable or open to learning about said topic.
The willingness of some people to remain ignorant when a simple Google Search and a minute reading would bring them up to speed with something they aren't sure about in a discussion they are taking part in is astounding.
Also, unless you actually say "one" when speaking face to face don't try and be a smart arse when using it online. It only makes you look like a huge pompous cock. One is not the Royal family.
Re: High Tech Chicks
Given the technological singularity has been known about and discussed for decades I am surprised you were unaware of its existence. Given, as you say, you have a bachelors degree in computer science.YaTingPom wrote: ↑Thu Feb 15, 2024 10:18 amI think that is the point I was making. People are too quick to take things at face value, like this click baitey video. Plus you have failed to even answer any of my questions, so off you pop to Google, but I warn you I have a BsC hons in computer science so I do know a little but about this subject.IraHayes wrote: ↑Thu Feb 15, 2024 9:48 amIf one is going to discuss a topic, one should at least be knowledgeable or open to learning about said topic.
The willingness of some people to remain ignorant when a simple Google Search and a minute reading would bring them up to speed with something they aren't sure about in a discussion they are taking part in is astounding.
Also, unless you actually say "one" when speaking face to face don't try and be a smart arse when using it online. It only makes you look like a huge pompous cock. One is not the Royal family.
Also, I was not attempting to answer your questions and my clipped quote of your post should have been sufficient to let you know I was simply questioning your logic behind the statement "AI is only as good as its human programmer". Maybe you skipped class that day?
- Big Daikon
- Expatriate
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:07 am
- Reputation: 2605
Re: High Tech Chicks
Disappointed in this thread. Expected more sexy androids.
Re: High Tech Chicks
This girl have style, she was in Blade Runner movie 1982.Big Daikon wrote: ↑Thu Feb 15, 2024 3:02 pm Disappointed in this thread. Expected more sexy androids.
Boredom is like a shroud
Re: High Tech Chicks
Yes, and an hour after publishing the video (folding t-shirts) and people started to take it apart, they had to admit, that it was remote controlled by an operator 2m beside itnewkidontheblock wrote: ↑Thu Feb 15, 2024 3:21 am Better yet, Optimus from Tesla.
Neural AI learning.
Not pre programmed to do flips.
Learns to do by watching. Similar to human learning.
Driving on Cambodian roads is just like playing a classic arcade top scroller. The only difference is a force feedback controller, the limitation to only one life and the inability to restart, once Game Over
- Big Daikon
- Expatriate
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:07 am
- Reputation: 2605
Re: High Tech Chicks
Exactly my point.cabron wrote: ↑Thu Feb 15, 2024 3:36 pmThis girl have style, she was in Blade Runner movie 1982.Big Daikon wrote: ↑Thu Feb 15, 2024 3:02 pm Disappointed in this thread. Expected more sexy androids.
- newkidontheblock
- Expatriate
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: Tue May 20, 2014 3:51 am
- Reputation: 1555
Re: High Tech Chicks
Computer learning by watching is exactly how humans learn. The actual baseline code isn’t so much. The AI writes itself based on how much experience it has. It’s then transferable to other situations and contexts. Just like people.
The theoretical problem is, what happens when the world changes? And all the information to form that learning becomes outdated?
In the 1800s, everyone knew everything about horses. How to ride a horse, care for, operate a wagon or buggy. Now that knowledge is irrelevant. What’s needed now is how to ride a motorcycle or drive a car.
Older people don’t do so well as the new generation. Will this be true of AI?
The theoretical problem is, what happens when the world changes? And all the information to form that learning becomes outdated?
In the 1800s, everyone knew everything about horses. How to ride a horse, care for, operate a wagon or buggy. Now that knowledge is irrelevant. What’s needed now is how to ride a motorcycle or drive a car.
Older people don’t do so well as the new generation. Will this be true of AI?
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 2 Replies
- 2712 Views
-
Last post by Ghostwriter
-
- 4 Replies
- 2639 Views
-
Last post by crob
-
- 17 Replies
- 10342 Views
-
Last post by Fridaywithmateo
-
- 6 Replies
- 2444 Views
-
Last post by mi1
-
- 0 Replies
- 5071 Views
-
Last post by thaigone
-
- 15 Replies
- 2850 Views
-
Last post by Jerry Atrick
-
- 0 Replies
- 886 Views
-
Last post by CEOCambodiaNews
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 291 guests