General Mackevili wrote: ↑Tue Aug 29, 2023 11:55 am

violet wrote: ↑Tue Aug 29, 2023 1:41 am

General Mackevili wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 1:08 pm As everyone probable knows, there's a new Covid variant starting to go around called "BA.2.86."

I know that mainstream scientists, pharmaceutical companies, doctors, media and the CDC were almost all telling us that it was "safe and effective," but the CDC has just come out to tell us that if you received the Covid vaccines you are probably more likely to catch the new Covid variant compared to those people who didn't get the Covid vaccines at all.





Being unvaccinated myself, I don't think it's fair to me that the vaccinated are putting me at a higher risk because they decided to do something that the CDC says made them probably more likely to get infected, so I think we can all agree the vaccinated need to be forced to lockdown and wear a mask if they dare to venture out in public putting me and my healthy family at risk of catching Covid!

The airlines better force all passengers to show proof of their non-vaccinated status before boarding a plane! I'm disgusted by those vaccinated people who think they have a right to sit next to me on a plane, when the choices they've made have probably made them more likely to catch and spread Covid infections!

CDC: "BA.2.86 may be more capable of causing infection in people who have previously had COVID-19 or who have received COVID-19 vaccines."

https://www.cdc.gov/respiratory-viruses ... 20vaccines.

And if you're one of those people who keep a mask in your pocket all day, and are touching your face all day and God knows what else, then touching your mask and your face again before placing that petri dish back over your airways, don't you dare breath in my direction, you mouth breather!

What you highlighted does not say what I underlined. You just demonstrated confirmation bias.

If that were the case and they're just saying it's "more contagious," then why wouldn't they just say "it may be more contagious" and not list vaccined and previously infected people? Pointing out those two groups of individuals is entirely unnecessary if that's in fact what they meant.

That's like them saying "men are more likely to have a new type of cancer." And then when someone asks, "wow, why are men more likely to get it than women?" they say, "no, you read that wrong, both men and women are more likely to get it, we are just comparing it to a different type of cancer which they are both less likely to get."



What you're suggesting it means should simply read like this:

CDC: "BA.2.86 may be more capable of causing infection in people."

RogueAnt wrote: ↑Tue Aug 29, 2023 1:54 pm Luckily I'm a "conspiracy theorist" and I did my own research and came to the conclusion that injecting toxins such as mercury, aluminum, PEG and inorganic proteins into myself numerous times for the flu, was a bad idea.

Lots of "sunk cost fallacy" on this thread. The sooner people realize that they were lied to, the sooner action can be taken. This is democide.

violet wrote: ↑Tue Aug 29, 2023 2:14 pm

RogueAnt wrote: ↑Tue Aug 29, 2023 1:54 pm Luckily I'm a "conspiracy theorist" and I did my own research and came to the conclusion that injecting toxins such as mercury, aluminum, PEG and inorganic proteins into myself numerous times for the flu, was a bad idea.

Lots of "sunk cost fallacy" on this thread. The sooner people realize that they were lied to, the sooner action can be taken. This is democide.

Whether or not people were lied to is beside the point of this thread.

RogueAnt wrote: ↑Tue Aug 29, 2023 2:35 pm

violet wrote: ↑Tue Aug 29, 2023 2:14 pm

RogueAnt wrote: ↑Tue Aug 29, 2023 1:54 pm Luckily I'm a "conspiracy theorist" and I did my own research and came to the conclusion that injecting toxins such as mercury, aluminum, PEG and inorganic proteins into myself numerous times for the flu, was a bad idea.

Lots of "sunk cost fallacy" on this thread. The sooner people realize that they were lied to, the sooner action can be taken. This is democide.

Whether or not people were lied to is beside the point of this thread.

I disagree. I haven't "invested" in SARS COV or any of the in silica variants. People (jabbed) are more likely to get sick (catch new variant) because they are more likely to have a higher level of toxins as a result of (see above) The CDC is telling you but you refuse to see. Your emotional and now biological investment is the trap.

John Bingham wrote: ↑Tue Aug 29, 2023 2:45 pm

RogueAnt wrote: ↑Tue Aug 29, 2023 1:54 pm Luckily I'm a "conspiracy theorist" and I did my own research and came to the conclusion that injecting toxins such as mercury, aluminum, PEG and inorganic proteins into myself numerous times for the flu, was a bad idea.

Lots of "sunk cost fallacy" on this thread. The sooner people realize that they were lied to, the sooner action can be taken. This is democide.

What's an inorganic protein?

John Bingham wrote: ↑Tue Aug 29, 2023 2:45 pm

RogueAnt wrote: ↑Tue Aug 29, 2023 1:54 pm Luckily I'm a "conspiracy theorist" and I did my own research and came to the conclusion that injecting toxins such as mercury, aluminum, PEG and inorganic proteins into myself numerous times for the flu, was a bad idea.

Lots of "sunk cost fallacy" on this thread. The sooner people realize that they were lied to, the sooner action can be taken. This is democide.

What's an inorganic protein?