Excellent decision against Alex Jones

Yeah, that place out 'there'. Anything not really Cambodia related should go here.
User avatar
rabbitoh
BANNED
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2022 6:04 am
Reputation: 47
Puerto Rico

Re: Excellent decision against Alex Jones

Post by rabbitoh »

Anchor Moy wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 9:32 pm @rabbitoh So how do you feel about the local politics then ? Do you think that they are lefties or righties ? What's your take on the local stuff ?,,,
After all, this is what counts on the ground. :bow:
It's a Khmer dictatorship. That simple.
User avatar
Kammekor
Expatriate
Posts: 6452
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 12:50 pm
Reputation: 2945
Cambodia

Re: Excellent decision against Alex Jones

Post by Kammekor »

rabbitoh wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 9:37 pm Looks like all your Gender Studies degrees aren't worth the paper they're printed on! You should have majored in English.
I'll wait while you after school bloodhounds find the clue.
Ouch..., your PhD in rhetorics, and all the other extensive knowledge you've shown so far, leaves me speachless. I read in amazement how you come up with the sharpest reasoning on this forum with apparently the biggest ease of all.. Kudos!
Anchor Moy
Expatriate
Posts: 13458
Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 11:37 pm
Reputation: 3974
Tokelau

Re: Excellent decision against Alex Jones

Post by Anchor Moy »

Yeah, ok,rabbitoh, you joined CEO 3 weeks ago, but until now none of your posts have anything to do with Cambodia.
Troll ??? :nono:
User avatar
rabbitoh
BANNED
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2022 6:04 am
Reputation: 47
Puerto Rico

Re: Excellent decision against Alex Jones

Post by rabbitoh »

^Kammekor, So you have a degree in Communications then?

And the sock Anchor using the big T word.
You also need to slow your reading and tune your observations.
User avatar
Ghostwriter
Expatriate
Posts: 3149
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2019 2:01 am
Reputation: 2025
France

Re: Excellent decision against Alex Jones

Post by Ghostwriter »

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Spoiler:
Image
User avatar
rabbitoh
BANNED
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2022 6:04 am
Reputation: 47
Puerto Rico

Re: Excellent decision against Alex Jones

Post by rabbitoh »

[Admin edit: Enough already, you're banned.]
User avatar
Ghostwriter
Expatriate
Posts: 3149
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2019 2:01 am
Reputation: 2025
France

Re: Excellent decision against Alex Jones

Post by Ghostwriter »

Image
User avatar
rabbitoh
BANNED
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2022 6:04 am
Reputation: 47
Puerto Rico

Re: Excellent decision against Alex Jones

Post by rabbitoh »

Image
User avatar
Big Daikon
Expatriate
Posts: 3189
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:07 am
Reputation: 2605
United States of America

Re: Excellent decision against Alex Jones

Post by Big Daikon »

Chad Sexington wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 6:07 pm I’ve no dog in this fight, and I don’t want to derail the thread, but I always wondered how it is that Westboro Baptist Church could get away with protesting/picketing at the funerals of fallen military personnel, getting right in the faces of bereaved families, telling them they’re glad their loved ones died, and waving their “God hates Fags” etc’ banners.
How or why, have the WBC never been brought to task?
Not derailing, but comparing. In the case Snyder v. Phelps, the court ruled that the speech of WBC was political activism and therefore protected by the 1AM.

https://www.uscourts.gov/educational-re ... r-v-phelps
The Supreme Court's holding turned largely on its determination that the church was speaking on "matters of public concern" as opposed to "matters of purely private significance." The Court explained that "[s]peech deals with matters of public concern when it can 'be fairly considered as relating to any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community' or when it 'is a subject of general interest and of value and concern to the public.'" Speech on public issues is entitled to special protection under the First Amendment because it serves the "the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open."
Even though some of the picket signs arguably targeted only the Snyder family, most of them addressed issues regarding the moral conduct of the U.S., the fate of the U.S., and homosexuality in the military. As such, the "overall thrust and dominant theme" of the speech related to broader public issues.
With regards to the Jones cases, perhaps the legal argument was that the circumstances were different from the above and thus not protected speech.
User avatar
nemo
Expatriate
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:34 pm
Reputation: 1395
Cambodia

Re: Excellent decision against Alex Jones

Post by nemo »

rabbitoh wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 10:26 pm [Admin edit: Enough already, you're banned.]
Good work- do the other trolls now please before it goes totally truth social/ 4chan

Members should report troll posts
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Big Daikon, Deefer, JF, Ong Tay, phuketrichard, Stravaiger and 626 guests