British GARY COSGROVE Sentenced for Child Sex Offenses in Cambodia

Cambodia news in English! Here you'll find all the breaking news from Cambodia translated into English for our international readership and expat community to read and comment on. The majority of our news stories are gathered from the local Khmer newspapers, but we also bring you newsworthy media from Cambodia before you read them anywhere else. Because of the huge population of the capital city, most articles are from Phnom Penh, but Siem Reap, Sihanoukville, and Kampot often make the headlines as well. We report on all arrests and deaths of foreigners in Cambodia, and the details often come from the Cambodian police or local Khmer journalists. As an ASEAN news outlet, we also publish regional news and events from our neighboring countries. We also share local Khmer news stories that you won't find in English anywhere else. If you're looking for a certain article, you may use our site's search feature to find it quickly.
User avatar
xandreu
Expatriate
Posts: 1876
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 11:37 am
Reputation: 1951
Great Britain

Re: British GARY COSGROVE Sentenced for Child Sex Offenses in Cambodia

Post by xandreu »

Chad Sexington wrote: Thu Nov 04, 2021 12:26 pm
xandreu wrote: Thu Nov 04, 2021 7:41 am A lot of talk about vigilantism on here, and with such an emotive subject and lackluster justice system, it's understandable.

Unfortunately, it's not a solution in the civilized world, no matter the crime, even the most despicable ones, which is why no civilized country has condoned it for a very long time. And the idea that it's worth a few innocent people getting wrongly accused if it acts as a deterrent is just ill-thought out at best. It's all well and good until that innocent person who's trapped inside a burning tyre, with dozens of marauding onlookers - including children - applauding the spectacle like some medieval ritual is you, or one of your loved ones, screaming their innocence while the skin on their face melts off.

We abolished this kind of behavior, including capital punishment - in case someone was wrongly accused - a long time ago, and I think most people would agree that it belongs in the past. If this is justice for you, there are plenty of places you can go and live, namely some African states or perhaps a country dominated by radical Islam? There are plenty to choose from.

Or you could just stay here and campaign for a big change in the justice system when dealing with this sort of crime.
Are you including the UK when you talk of ‘civilized countries? Where convicted child murderers and child rapists are freed (ever so quietly though, so that the neighbors don’t kick up a fuss) into the general public (is it any wonder the members of a community, on finding out they have a monster who is a proven danger to children living amongst them, may consider taking the law into their own hands to keep their kids safe?)
Is it civilized when Asian grooming gangs are allowed to rape young white girls, in the full knowledge of the police and local authorities, because those authorities would rather turn a blind eye to the crimes than arrest the perpetrators and risk being accused of racism?
What kind of justice system puts the feelings of criminals above the safety of their child victims?

And it isn’t just crimes against children (though they are by far the most serious) people are being stabbed and murdered on an almost daily basis, house break ins that police don’t even bother to investigate, muggings so frequent that they no longer make the headlines, the list goes on.

Where is the deterrent when those convicted of violent crime and assault are for the most part ‘punished’ with Community Service Orders (of which compliance with, is left to the criminals own discretion, namely ignored) or suspended sentences (sentences that are not actioned when those convicted reoffend, often repeatedly, supposedly because the prisons are all full)?

These days the justice system in the UK is operated mainly for the benefit of those employed in it, why spend taxpayers money on building more jails (when they are built, it’s only to replace existing jails whose levels of comfort are deemed unacceptable for the convicts) when that money could be paid out in legal aid for repeat offenders, the cash cows of the legal system, if they’re locked up they’re not bringing in revenue (and not being punished in the first place increases the likelihood of them reoffending) catch and release for the benefit of lawyers.

I suspect many more people support the idea of capital punishment than you think. Criminal forensics have come a long way since capital punishment was banned, the chances of being wrongly convicted are very small, and there are many cases where guilt is proven beyond any doubt, for despicable crimes that most consider should warrant capital punishment.
Unfortunately, a referendum on the reintroduction of capital punishment will probably never be allowed by those in power, because they know what the result would be (and perhaps they fear themselves or their friends may fall foul of it?)

Is the UK a civilized country these days? Or has it become a dangerous, crime ridden toilet thats getting worse by the day?
Unfortunately, deterrents don't work on hardened, determined criminals or people with a natural inclination to commit crimes such as rapists, child abusers and serial killers, which are the type of people you seem to be talking about. They most often commit their crimes in the belief that they won't get caught so why should they consider the consequences or any supposed deterrent?

There are countries across the world with varying degrees of severity when it comes to their justice systems, from the barbaric in many middle eastern countries, the ludicrous in the states (what in the world is the use in giving someone a sentence many times their natural remaining lifespan?) the extremely violent in South American countries, to the much more liberal approach in Europe. Guess what? There is barely any corrolation between the number of serious crimes committed in a country and the severity of repercussions in that respective county's legal system. Deterrents only work on casual law-breakers, ie, those unlikely to raise enough anger in the local community to arouse any serious form of social vigilantism. Unless of course it was gang-on-gang types of crime, but that's not what we're talking about here.

I do fully agree with you that the legal system, as it stands in the UK, does not reflect what the majority of its citizens expect from a functioning judiciary, but I just don't think that mass acceptance of vigilantism is the answer. We have trials and courts for many reasons, and the basic fundamental human right to a fair trial has been around for centuries for good reason. Yes, including alleged kiddie fiddlers.

I don't know what the answer is, and I'm not going to pretend to know. There are those much better qualified than myself to make more sensible, educated suggestions as to what the answers are. It's a complicated, multi-faceted topic once you get under the hood.

But I know that judges, juries, and in some cases, executioners, belong in courts of law. Not a pub car park somewhere with frenzied, marauding mobs encouraging the most gruesome acts of inhumanity that can be committed against another human being.

That just makes us no different to the alleged - yes, alleged - perpetrator.
The difference between animals and humans is that animals would never allow the dumb ones to lead the pack.
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], John Bingham, Majestic-12 [Bot], Soriya and 855 guests