america's involvement in Afghanistan closes
Re: america's involvement in Afghanistan closes
Thats a good point. Not forgetting their sacrifices.blueman.cambodia wrote: ↑Mon Aug 16, 2021 7:39 am
Mmmm? Why say "if US won the Vietnam war....." ??
The Vietnam war southern alliance was made up of USA, Philippines, south Korea, Thailand, Australia and New Zealand., And of course the ARVN of South Vietnam.
My question still stands.
People of the world, spice up your life.
Re: america's involvement in Afghanistan closes
I think it's safe to say that the Vietnam war was pretty much a US led operation. They may have had allies but it was definitely a US led campaign.blueman.cambodia wrote: ↑Mon Aug 16, 2021 7:39 am
Mmmm? Why say "if US won the Vietnam war....." ??
The Vietnam war southern alliance was made up of USA, Philippines, south Korea, Thailand, Australia and New Zealand., And of course the ARVN of South Vietnam.
The difference between animals and humans is that animals would never allow the dumb ones to lead the pack.
Re: america's involvement in Afghanistan closes
Which, one hopes, will have been disabled before being abandoned. Pakistan might buy them on the cheap for spare parts.phuketrichard wrote: ↑Mon Aug 16, 2021 7:23 am just in, the Taliban now has more black hawk helicopters than 166 other nations around the globe.
Another democratically elected government overthrown ;-(
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2014 7:44 pm
- Reputation: -8
Re: america's involvement in Afghanistan closes
We lost in Vietnam.
Just as we've lost in Afganistan.
Truth hurts some I'm sure.
Just as we've lost in Afganistan.
Truth hurts some I'm sure.
Re: america's involvement in Afghanistan closes
Anyone got one of these?
Because this lot:
are here, having a big party
Because this lot:
are here, having a big party
- Jerry Atrick
- Expatriate
- Posts: 5453
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 4:19 pm
- Reputation: 3065
Re: america's involvement in Afghanistan closes
I did laugh when he claimed to have left to "avoid bloodshed" Yes, his blood to be precise.Jerry Atrick wrote: ↑Mon Aug 16, 2021 10:12 amWell, they have a more legitimate claim to it than the US puppet who fled yesterday
I wonder how many of these government and military leaders have managed to obtain duel citizenship over the last 20 years (as part of the deal), have been spiriting away all the money stolen through corruption and will now suddenly appear outside their extremely valuable apartments in Manhattan or Mayfair.
Re: america's involvement in Afghanistan closes
The difference between animals and humans is that animals would never allow the dumb ones to lead the pack.
Re: america's involvement in Afghanistan closes
Through two decades of combat and hundreds of billions of dollars spent building up Kabul’s military and civilian institutions, successive U.S. administrations followed strategies that inadvertently fueled support for the insurgency, missed windows to negotiate and, finally, came to a settlement with the Taliban that undercut the ability of the Afghan government to negotiate concessions.
Along the way, the U.S. underestimated the damage caused by empowering local warlords who took government jobs, and turned a blind eye to corruption that hollowed out govern-ment institutions.
American policy makers overestimated the Afghan military’s ability to defend the country, and, toward the end, U.S. negotiators misjudged the enemy’s willingness to accept anything less than total victory.
The missteps began almost immedi-ately after U.S. forces, seeking revenge against the regime that gave shelter to Osama bin Laden and the other al Qaeda perpetrators of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, invaded Afghanistan.
The Americans quickly swept the Taliban from power, leaving the Islamists back on their heels in 2002. Amid public anger over the terrorist attacks, then-President George W. Bush’s administration missed the opportunity to make peace with the weakened Taliban and give them a role in the country’s future. Mr. Bush soon turned his attention to the invasion of Iraq, distracting resources and attention from Afghanistan.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/chaotic-af ... yURL_share
Along the way, the U.S. underestimated the damage caused by empowering local warlords who took government jobs, and turned a blind eye to corruption that hollowed out govern-ment institutions.
American policy makers overestimated the Afghan military’s ability to defend the country, and, toward the end, U.S. negotiators misjudged the enemy’s willingness to accept anything less than total victory.
The missteps began almost immedi-ately after U.S. forces, seeking revenge against the regime that gave shelter to Osama bin Laden and the other al Qaeda perpetrators of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, invaded Afghanistan.
The Americans quickly swept the Taliban from power, leaving the Islamists back on their heels in 2002. Amid public anger over the terrorist attacks, then-President George W. Bush’s administration missed the opportunity to make peace with the weakened Taliban and give them a role in the country’s future. Mr. Bush soon turned his attention to the invasion of Iraq, distracting resources and attention from Afghanistan.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/chaotic-af ... yURL_share
she was quite pretty and looked older
she knew only what had been told her
she knew only what had been told her
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 5 Replies
- 3880 Views
-
Last post by Username Taken
-
- 15 Replies
- 2950 Views
-
Last post by Freightdog
-
- 21 Replies
- 4062 Views
-
Last post by SternAAlbifrons
-
- 1 Replies
- 1104 Views
-
Last post by CEOCambodiaNews
-
- 1 Replies
- 1756 Views
-
Last post by CEOCambodiaNews
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 530 guests