A $27 Billion vaccine is not big pharma's new normal

Yeah, that place out 'there'. Anything not really Cambodia related should go here.
User avatar
Jerry Atrick
Expatriate
Posts: 5453
Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Reputation: 3064
Central African Republic

A $27 Billion vaccine is not big pharma's new normal

Post by Jerry Atrick »

Vaccines have traditionally been among the least glamorous and most challenging areas of pharma. Developing new shots is uniquely time consuming and expensive, and despite the extra effort required, sales are consistently lower than in other drug categories.

The arrival of Covid-19 changed everything.
More from
Get Ready to Pay More for Coffee, Beer, Bread and Snacks
Credit Suisse Just Couldn’t Say No to Archegos
Who’s Really Supposed to Pay for Your Commute?
Now Is Biden’s Best Chance to Ditch the Iran Nuclear Talks

Pfizer Inc. and BioNTech SE’s Covid shot is poised to shatter the single-year sales record for a drug. Wall Street analysts expect more than $27 billion in 2021 revenue from their highly effective Covid vaccine, a shot that uses new messenger RNA technology. 1 Add in $18 billion in expected sales of Moderna Inc.'s similar vaccine, and you get more than $45 billion from two medicines. That's more revenue than 88% of S&P 500 companies generated last year. It's hard to believe, but estimates could grow after Pfizer's second-quarter earnings update Wednesday as the surging delta variant boosts demand. The company announced a new order of 200 million doses from the U.S. government July 23.

These extraordinary numbers are already shifting behavior. Moderna's market cap has ballooned above $130 billion even though it sells only one product, and vaccine investment is suddenly hot. But some caution is warranted. The economics of the drug industry don't change easily.
Unprecedented

Pandemic vaccine sales will provide a historic boost for leading companies -- for the next couple of years at least

Source: Bloomberg

A look at the best-selling pharmaceuticals is revealing. There was just one vaccine among the world’s 15 most lucrative medicines in 2020: Pfizer’s pneumonia shot Prevnar. You’ll find it toward the bottom of the chart below, which ranks expected drug sales leaders through 2023. The industry’s biggest blockbusters tend to be expensive, like cancer drugs Keytruda and Imbruvica, each of which can cost more than $100,000 for a year’s treatment. Other drugs that rank highly in the sales charts are ones that treat chronic conditions and are prescribed for many years or a lifetime instead of just a few times like most vaccines. Drugmakers have responded to these incentives by shifting investment toward cancer and away from infectious diseases.
The Blockbusters

It's not likely that vaccines will top the list of the world's best-selling drugs again unless there's another pandemic

Source: Bloomberg

Note: Top 15 best selling drugs in the world in 2020 according to reported sales. Subsequent rankings based on consensus forecasts compiled by Bloomberg.


All things being equal, vaccines should be an attractive market. They’re complicated to make and face extra regulatory scrutiny, which creates barriers to entry. And because otherwise healthy people get jabs, they’re high-volume products. But they’re also crucial to public health and vulnerable populations like children and the elderly. As a result, governments do much of the purchasing, and prices are much lower than other branded drugs.

When it comes to Covid vaccines, the mRNA Covid shots from Moderna and Pfizer will have a brief and enormously profitable window while the whole world needs shots. 2 But eventually, the market will trend toward normalcy, with sales narrowed to boosters for limited high-risk populations and more competition. Analysts expect sales to plunge after 2022.
Opinion. Data. More Data.
Get the most important Bloomberg Opinion pieces in one email.
Email
By submitting my information, I agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Service and to receive offers and promotions from Bloomberg.

In order to sustain optimism at that point, investors will have to believe that a technological leap can more permanently change the market. That’s a pretty big risk, even if mRNA does allows for more flexible and faster development and has been validated by pandemic success. Research and development efforts will be richly funded. But it will take years to find out whether the technology is consistently more effective or can target diseases that other methods can’t reach. It isn’t just shareholders who should hope that technology proves out.

The future of vaccines may otherwise rest on governments supporting continuing investment in ways they haven’t after past outbreaks or transforming how they pay for medicines. That’s far from a sure bet.

—With graphics assistance from Elaine He

Consensus for Pfizer revenue from the vaccine is $27.265 billion as of 7/23. BioNTech directly records sales in Germany and Turkey, but most of its revenue comes from its 50/50 profit share with Pfizer. It recorded $2.39 billion in revenue from the vaccine in the first quarter, $235.3 million of which came from direct sales. If you apply that proportion to the consensus estimate for its total revenue from the vaccine, which doesn't distinguish between direct and partnership sales, you get $536 million in revenue that might not be in the Pfizer estimate. Pharma is strange sometimes.

Other shots are available, of course. But the lion's share of the revenue is going to the companies making mRNA shots. That's in part because they're most in demand in wealthier nations that pay more. Additionally, other companies including Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca PLC are selling vaccines at nonprofit prices.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/artic ... out-growth

$27,000 000 000

If you could save $10,000 every single day, then it would only take you 7,397 years to save 27 billion

And that's just the mRNA shots developed so far, it doesn't include the likes of Sinovac, Sinopharm, Sputnik V, the Cuban one that's en route of any others
User avatar
Username Taken
Raven
Posts: 13937
Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 6:53 pm
Reputation: 6010
Cambodia

Re: A $27 Billion vaccine is not big pharma's new normal

Post by Username Taken »

I wonder who the major shareholders in these big Pharma companies are, and when they bought their shares.
Bluenose
Expatriate
Posts: 849
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2020 1:44 pm
Reputation: 464
Great Britain

Re: A $27 Billion vaccine is not big pharma's new normal

Post by Bluenose »

$27,000 000 000

If you could save $10,000 every single day, then it would only take you 7,397 years to save 27 billion

A big figure indeed but, if we're making random illustrations of how big, it's only a tenth of what Americans spend on alcohol each year
User avatar
truffledog
Expatriate
Posts: 1662
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2020 4:54 am
Reputation: 1030
Italy

Re: A $27 Billion vaccine is not big pharma's new normal

Post by truffledog »

add the figures/revenues for the various test kits (like PCR and other)...the amount spent is insane. I sometimes wonder why the same amout has not been spent to eradicate hunger in the past.
work is for people who cant find truffles
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Newinkow and 648 guests