Why does Cambodia never feature in pretty much anything?

This is where our community discusses almost anything! While we're mainly a Cambodia expat discussion forum and talk about expat life here, we debate about almost everything. Even if you're a tourist passing through Southeast Asia and want to connect with expatriates living and working in Cambodia, this is the first section of our site that you should check out. Our members start their own discussions or post links to other blogs and/or news articles they find interesting and want to chat about. So join in the fun and start new topics, or feel free to comment on anything our community members have already started! We also have some Khmer members here as well, but English is the main language used on CEO. You're welcome to have a look around, and if you decide you want to participate, you can become a part our international expat community by signing up for a free account.
samrong01
Expatriate
Posts: 442
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 5:37 pm
Reputation: 225
New Zealand

Re: Why does Cambodia never feature in pretty much anything?

Post by samrong01 »

samrong01 wrote: Sun Jan 31, 2021 7:00 am
clutchcargo wrote: Sat Jan 30, 2021 7:57 pm
samrong01 wrote: Sat Jan 30, 2021 7:07 pm There is a good reason why Cambodia never features in lists of countries with low incidence of the virus. It clearly demonstrates that lockdowns, masks, and all the ridiculous measures taken by western governments have no effect whatsoever. This does not sit well with governments whose objective is to use the pandemic to increase their power and control over their people, so they pretend Cambodia does not exist. By doing nothing other than destroying the tourist industry and children's education (for no good reason), Cambodia is actually number 1 in the world for avoiding the virus with Laos number 2. It is ridiculous to say that New Zealand is best when they have had some deaths in a much smaller population while Cambodia has had none. New Zealand is best only of the countries that believe that draconian measures are the answer.

The study by the University of Grenoble clearly established that there is no relationship between government measures and the progress of the virus and Cambodia is proof of the truth of that.
Can you give us a link to that study? I googled the above bolded but couldn't readily see anything.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10 ... 04339/full
Above is a link to the full results of the study including onwards links to appendices.
Apologies for mentioning University of Grenoble. My memory is faulty. Its actually a collaborative effort from several Universities including University of Toulouse, Cote d'Azur, and Lausanne among others.
User avatar
Doc67
Expatriate
Posts: 8914
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:16 am
Reputation: 8194
Location: PHNOM PENH
Great Britain

Re: Why does Cambodia never feature in pretty much anything?

Post by Doc67 »

timmydownawell wrote: Sun Jan 31, 2021 8:09 am I'd be very interested to know if they have done sewage testing for Covid here. And if they did, whether they detected it. I know some of you suspect it's lurking here undetected (and it's not impossible).
Everyone take a dump in the street and we'll get Cintri on the case...
User avatar
timmydownawell
Expatriate
Posts: 3626
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 12:50 pm
Reputation: 1454
Cambodia

Re: Why does Cambodia never feature in pretty much anything?

Post by timmydownawell »

Doc67 wrote: Sun Jan 31, 2021 8:49 am
timmydownawell wrote: Sun Jan 31, 2021 8:09 am I'd be very interested to know if they have done sewage testing for Covid here. And if they did, whether they detected it. I know some of you suspect it's lurking here undetected (and it's not impossible).
Everyone take a dump in the street and we'll get Cintri on the case...
Their job is shitty enough as it is.
You must walk in traffic to cross the road - Cambodian proverb
User avatar
Clutch Cargo
Expatriate
Posts: 7743
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2018 3:09 pm
Reputation: 6001
Cambodia

Re: Why does Cambodia never feature in pretty much anything?

Post by Clutch Cargo »

samrong01 wrote: Sun Jan 31, 2021 7:00 am
clutchcargo wrote: Sat Jan 30, 2021 7:57 pm
samrong01 wrote: Sat Jan 30, 2021 7:07 pm There is a good reason why Cambodia never features in lists of countries with low incidence of the virus. It clearly demonstrates that lockdowns, masks, and all the ridiculous measures taken by western governments have no effect whatsoever. This does not sit well with governments whose objective is to use the pandemic to increase their power and control over their people, so they pretend Cambodia does not exist. By doing nothing other than destroying the tourist industry and children's education (for no good reason), Cambodia is actually number 1 in the world for avoiding the virus with Laos number 2. It is ridiculous to say that New Zealand is best when they have had some deaths in a much smaller population while Cambodia has had none. New Zealand is best only of the countries that believe that draconian measures are the answer.

The study by the University of Grenoble clearly established that there is no relationship between government measures and the progress of the virus and Cambodia is proof of the truth of that.
Can you give us a link to that study? I googled the above bolded but couldn't readily see anything.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10 ... 04339/full
Above is a link to the full results of the study including onwards links to appendices.
Thanks for that link.

I think it's important for context to spell out the main finding re the issue of effect of government measures ..extract:
Regarding government's actions (i.e., containment and stringency index), no association was found with the outcome, suggesting that the other studied factors were more important in the Covid-19 mortality than political measures implemented to fight the virus, except for the economic support index.
Covid-19 has prompted a wide range of responses from governments around the world, yet the contagion and mortality curves are very homologous among countries (33). This is reinforced by our findings regarding the lack of any association with the government's actions taken during the pandemic. In that sense, the determining demographic, health, development, and environment factors seem much more important to anticipate the lethal consequences of the Covid-19 than government's actions, especially when such actions are led by political goals more than by sanitary ones.
This study looks at the effect on mortality rates. So, it's one thing to say 'they found no relation between government actions and Covid 19 mortality rates'. And another to say 'there is no relationship between government measures and the progress of the virus'.

Without wanting to sound pedantic, covid mortality and covid progress are two different things in my book. The former referring to an outcome, the latter being a wider term also referring to transmission and spread.
The situation in islands such as Taiwan, New Zealand, or Iceland, that quickly imposed restrictive measures on air transport, shows that the virus has not become endemic in these first 8 months. After a rapid propagation phase, only the re-importation of subjects contaminated outside the island provoked new local cases.
So, they acknowledge here there is a relationship between border control and progress of the virus.

For those interested, it's also worth reading the 2 comments at the bottom of the study link re impact of government measures.
samrong01
Expatriate
Posts: 442
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 5:37 pm
Reputation: 225
New Zealand

Re: Why does Cambodia never feature in pretty much anything?

Post by samrong01 »

With respect I do not agree that there is any distinction between progress of the disease and mortality. Mortality is fundamental to any disease. What does it matter if thousands of people have COVID19 if none of them die? The study demonstrates that death rates from COVID19 will naturally be higher in wealthy countries with sedentary lifestyles and high rates of obesity regardless of government action. In fact the death rate per 100,000 of population is the only fairly reliable measure available since these numbers are the only numbers that can be known with any degree of accuracy. The number of cases is a meaningless figure as it is a number that can not possibly be known for a disease that is without symptoms in 90% of cases. Some say that actual cases are 10 times the number reported, others say perhaps 5 times - it is an open question.
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bluenose, Khmu Nation, KunKhmerSR, Ong Tay, truffledog and 692 guests