Yerg wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 3:18 am And as a small aside. Are the sarcastic commentators, commentators, or commenters? It might be small, but it’s a really important differentiator. I’m no grammar nazi, but there really is a difference. John Motson is a commentator. Not a commenter.

Yerg wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 3:18 am And as a small aside. Are the sarcastic commentators, commentators, or commenters? It might be small, but it’s a really important differentiator. I’m no grammar nazi, but there really is a difference. John Motson is a commentator. Not a commenter.

explorer wrote: ↑Wed Sep 16, 2020 9:52 pm This forum should be a good source of information for everything about Cambodia. Not the play thing of a few people to compensate for feeling inferior.

explorer wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 1:04 pm The people who make decisions will, no doubt make whatever decisions they believe are best.

A number of people expressed concern over those who continually trash intelligent discussions.

If things remain the same, CEO continues to be the plaything of those who want to make fun of everything.

You should know why some choose to no longer post, or post very little.

Username Taken wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 4:56 pm ^^^ See that everybody? Yet another poster with more karma/reputation than posts. I guess that's what happens when you make sensible posts.

This forum should be a good source of information for everything about Cambodia. Not the play thing of a few people to compensate for feeling inferior.

John Bingham wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 9:48 pm I think the best solution would be to have a special section which would serve as a sort of safe zone for the intellectuals who are under constant assault by brain-in-the-gutter types - you know who they are. It would be a members only zone, you would have to ask permission to join. I would, by default, be banned from even looking upon such lofty realms. However I don't mind, I'd rather they didn't feel threatened on here and they deserve better.