Trump's Finance Dealings Before the Supreme Court
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:17 pm
- Reputation: 271
Re: Trump's Finance Dealings Before the Supreme Court
Wow. That is some damn strong coolaid being consumed by some of the orange ones supporters. Does it make you blind as well as stupid? I love how anyone who is not a Trump fan is written off as intellectually challenged or a drug addict who has lost his marbles and is therefore not worthy to comment. Meanwhile back in delusion land Trump has done nothing wrong and is being persecuted by all and sundry for no reason. Yeah. Right.
Give me a doddering Biden over egomaniac Trump any time.
Give me a doddering Biden over egomaniac Trump any time.
Re: Trump's Finance Dealings Before the Supreme Court
Some of you are hijacking my post, politically lashing out, running your mouth all over various unrelated topics. In question is whether a most powerful leader in a DEMOCRATIC country 1) is immune from any liability of "reasonable suspicion" of wrongdoing/corruption, or 2) can simply ignore the powers vested in the people and Congress, the co-equal branch of the government.MikeD wrote: ↑Mon May 11, 2020 5:56 pm You can watch the live arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court on CNBC.com on Tuesday May 12th at 10AM Eastern:
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/10/supreme ... esday.html
1. Never before where a sitting president has loss so many cases before the lower courts.
2. Both the State and part of Congress are suing to see Trump's tax/financial records and his family dealings.
3. His former lawyer, Cohen, is now serving his prison term in a NY prison and his friend, Epstein, was jailed for child pornography and subsequently hanged himself.
4. This type of absolute power challenge would never make it this far in Cambodia, Russia or China!!!
....
Are you a friend or a foe? You decide. How will the U.S Supreme Court decide?
I think the Chief Justice does not want to take side in a very politically charged environment and may rule "undecided"? Others may rule that the highest public trust position like that of the president must not be immune from "reasonable" inquiries and investigations. That means the records should be released. This is all about trust and confidence in a leader.
Re: Trump's Finance Dealings Before the Supreme Court
where could you imprison everybody in the nsa and cia?oldfatbarang wrote: ↑Mon May 11, 2020 8:32 pmI hope and pray that anyone who was involved in illegal wiretaps and an attempted coup will serve time in prison.
Re: Trump's Finance Dealings Before the Supreme Court
agree 100%
name one US president since 1945 that wasnt.
the system encourages deceit and lying by rewarding the most-funded candidate.
do you expect an angel when funding is from devils?
Re: Trump's Finance Dealings Before the Supreme Court
Trump lawyers arguments are weak against the rule of law and existing precedent that a sitting president is not immune from lawful subpoenas and criminal investigations:
Finally, while the president’s lawyers suggested that the subpoena could be delayed until after the president leaves office, New York’s lawyer emphasized that such a delay could prevent the state from bringing charges because of state statutes of limitations, and it could otherwise make it more difficult to prosecute crimes that pertain to the president. This was the same concern the court acknowledged in Jones when it refused to delay that case, reasoning that “delaying trial would increase the danger of prejudice resulting from the loss of evidence, including the inability of witnesses to recall specific facts, or the possible death of a party.”
In short, if the court applies its own precedent from Clinton v. Jones to the Vance case, it is clear that the president’s arguments should not carry the day. Multiple justices appointed by presidents of both parties seemed to understand that.
Despite the weight of the Jones precedent, it remains difficult to tell whether the court will side with Trump, giving him almost limitless authority to avoid lawful subpoenas, or with the New York district attorney, who is simply seeking to do his job of investigating criminal wrongdoing. It appeared at least on Tuesday, though, that multiple justices understood the potential disastrous consequences of a ruling in Trump’s favor, both with regard to the court’s prior precedents and to the rule of law itself.
-
- Tourist
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 10:35 pm
- Reputation: 0
Re: Trump's Finance Dealings Before the Supreme Court
always nice to know that "Deutsche bank" (a save heaven for former nazi helpers) financed Donald ? Trump.
they always find each other...
they always find each other...
Re: Trump's Finance Dealings Before the Supreme Court
i despise most bankers but how long ago was that?the other swiss wrote: ↑Wed May 13, 2020 10:06 am always nice to know that "Deutsche bank" (a save heaven for former nazi helpers) financed Donald ? Trump.
they always find each other...
swiss banks shielded hundreds of thousands of dictators, cons, murderers and looters for many, many years longer
american banks, british banks, stock exchanges, scammers manipulators and exploiters
bank is a 4-letter word
- SternAAlbifrons
- Expatriate
- Posts: 5752
- Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2019 11:31 am
- Reputation: 3424
- Location: Gilligan's Island
Re: Trump's Finance Dealings Before the Supreme Court
LOL
I remember the "Khmer Rouge's banker" appearing at the 2nd KRT trial.
Such an beeeautiful, "summer wool", dark pinstripe, perfectly tailored, bankers suit.
The immaculate, ubiquitous banker.
I remember the "Khmer Rouge's banker" appearing at the 2nd KRT trial.
Such an beeeautiful, "summer wool", dark pinstripe, perfectly tailored, bankers suit.
The immaculate, ubiquitous banker.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 194 Replies
- 123597 Views
-
Last post by Big Daikon
-
- 50 Replies
- 15326 Views
-
Last post by cautious colin
-
- 0 Replies
- 1230 Views
-
Last post by CEOCambodiaNews
-
- 7 Replies
- 1499 Views
-
Last post by SternAAlbifrons
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 345 guests