Putting the Boots to a Crazy Dude
Re: Putting the Boots to a Crazy Dude
No when she lost an argument and had nothing intelligent to say.SternAAlbifrons wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 2:58 amlolWildA wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2020 8:22 pmThats what my kid used to say when she was a pre teen.SternAAlbifrons wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2020 12:26 pm "My Chant:
No one likes us, no one likes us,
No one likes us, we don't care,
We are Yankees, fucking Yankees,
Fat rich Yankees, from the States...."
whatever...
When you tried to teach her your chant?
Naturam expelles furca, tamen usque recurret. Horace
Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean they arent out to get you. Pynchon
Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean they arent out to get you. Pynchon
Re: Putting the Boots to a Crazy Dude
-
JUDGEDREDD
- Expatriate
- Posts: 899
- Joined: Wed May 31, 2017 2:34 am
- Reputation: 368
Re: Putting the Boots to a Crazy Dude
I'd call back to life experience over a google result, I've had a whack before and seen a few dished out. stats and studies don't often get the reality of it opposed to when it's live and direct.IraHayes wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2020 7:35 pmNot according to a simple check on google.JUDGEDREDD wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2020 7:28 pm Like it or not, sometimes a good whack will change a persons behaviour.And more here https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog ... duce-crimeThe claim that corporal punishment is an especially effective deterrent has been refuted by empirical evidence, however, which shows that offenders who are punished by corporal means are actually slightly more likely to commit further crimes than are those punished by imprisonment.
Slow down little world, you're changing too fast.
Re: Putting the Boots to a Crazy Dude
It’s hardly just a “google result” though is it?JUDGEDREDD wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 9:11 pmI'd call back to life experience over a google result, I've had a whack before and seen a few dished out. stats and studies don't often get the reality of it opposed to when it's live and direct.IraHayes wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2020 7:35 pmNot according to a simple check on google.JUDGEDREDD wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2020 7:28 pm Like it or not, sometimes a good whack will change a persons behaviour.And more here https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog ... duce-crimeThe claim that corporal punishment is an especially effective deterrent has been refuted by empirical evidence, however, which shows that offenders who are punished by corporal means are actually slightly more likely to commit further crimes than are those punished by imprisonment.
All the literature, quite clearly, points to corporal punishment being ineffective.
What you are actually saying is that you believe your anecdotal evidence somehow trumps the clinical studies.
Re: Putting the Boots to a Crazy Dude
Cool. Lets start with this. Afteryou are done, we can begin the lecture/
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_men ... kstone.asp
O yes thats old english so the ff you see is really an s.
Naturam expelles furca, tamen usque recurret. Horace
Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean they arent out to get you. Pynchon
Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean they arent out to get you. Pynchon
Re: Putting the Boots to a Crazy Dude
Well, it seems that you are unfortunately evading the discussion, and I asked so politely.WildA wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 10:40 pmCool. Lets start with this. Afteryou are done, we can begin the lecture/
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_men ... kstone.asp
O yes thats old english so the ff you see is really an s.
I researched a bit, though, as it actually interested me, and it seems to be pretty much consensus that the judicial system in the USA is nowhere near the top, as can be seen by incarceration rate, compliance etc, which are some of the ways of trying to get a "rank". The Scandinavian systems, as well as the English or Welsh, seem to be favoured by most scholars/researchers.
Re: Putting the Boots to a Crazy Dude
Academics have to publish. Whatever they publish has no bearing on the philosophical matter of which I speak.bong.kuit wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 1:57 amWell, it seems that you are unfortunately evading the discussion, and I asked so politely.WildA wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 10:40 pmCool. Lets start with this. Afteryou are done, we can begin the lecture/
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_men ... kstone.asp
O yes thats old english so the ff you see is really an s.
I researched a bit, though, as it actually interested me, and it seems to be pretty much consensus that the judicial system in the USA is nowhere near the top, as can be seen by incarceration rate, compliance etc, which are some of the ways of trying to get a "rank". The Scandinavian systems, as well as the English or Welsh, seem to be favoured by most scholars/researchers.
But hey I saw a "favoured", so Ill assume English. Lets discuss your written constitution...ooops.....your freedomof speech....oooops. Et seq.
Naturam expelles furca, tamen usque recurret. Horace
Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean they arent out to get you. Pynchon
Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean they arent out to get you. Pynchon
Re: Putting the Boots to a Crazy Dude
I'll take being thought of as English as a compliment. I'm a non-native speaker that learned British English in school a few decades ago. And no, also not from Scandinavia.
Anyway, I'll rest my case, as you don't have much to say besides lame ad hominems, childish nationalism, and pathetic arrogance. Such attitude makes it also pretty obvious that you have never read a single page of Pynchon (who you misquoted btw), let alone philosophy.
Peace out, bro.
Anyway, I'll rest my case, as you don't have much to say besides lame ad hominems, childish nationalism, and pathetic arrogance. Such attitude makes it also pretty obvious that you have never read a single page of Pynchon (who you misquoted btw), let alone philosophy.
Peace out, bro.
-
JUDGEDREDD
- Expatriate
- Posts: 899
- Joined: Wed May 31, 2017 2:34 am
- Reputation: 368
Re: Putting the Boots to a Crazy Dude
My original post stated sometimes mate, my call back to personal experience was regarding sometimes, if you wish to misinterpret what I say and summarise my words incorrectly then I have nothing else to say on the matter lol.IraHayes wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 9:39 pmIt’s hardly just a “google result” though is it?JUDGEDREDD wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 9:11 pmI'd call back to life experience over a google result, I've had a whack before and seen a few dished out. stats and studies don't often get the reality of it opposed to when it's live and direct.IraHayes wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2020 7:35 pmNot according to a simple check on google.JUDGEDREDD wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2020 7:28 pm Like it or not, sometimes a good whack will change a persons behaviour.And more here https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog ... duce-crimeThe claim that corporal punishment is an especially effective deterrent has been refuted by empirical evidence, however, which shows that offenders who are punished by corporal means are actually slightly more likely to commit further crimes than are those punished by imprisonment.
All the literature, quite clearly, points to corporal punishment being ineffective.
What you are actually saying is that you believe your anecdotal evidence somehow trumps the clinical studies.
Slow down little world, you're changing too fast.
Re: Putting the Boots to a Crazy Dude
Seriously? The timeline, as is evident in the quotes above, clearly shows I was responding to your claim of "sometimes". It was this I was taking umbrage with as the evidence is very clear. It never works.JUDGEDREDD wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 1:29 pmMy original post stated sometimes mate, my call back to personal experience was regarding sometimes, if you wish to misinterpret what I say and summarise my words incorrectly then I have nothing else to say on the matter lol.IraHayes wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 9:39 pmIt’s hardly just a “google result” though is it?JUDGEDREDD wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 9:11 pmI'd call back to life experience over a google result, I've had a whack before and seen a few dished out. stats and studies don't often get the reality of it opposed to when it's live and direct.IraHayes wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2020 7:35 pmNot according to a simple check on google.JUDGEDREDD wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2020 7:28 pm Like it or not, sometimes a good whack will change a persons behaviour.And more here https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog ... duce-crimeThe claim that corporal punishment is an especially effective deterrent has been refuted by empirical evidence, however, which shows that offenders who are punished by corporal means are actually slightly more likely to commit further crimes than are those punished by imprisonment.
All the literature, quite clearly, points to corporal punishment being ineffective.
What you are actually saying is that you believe your anecdotal evidence somehow trumps the clinical studies.
your reply was to dismiss "stats and studies" as they somehow don't relate to the real world. The problem is the countless studies that have been done in this area were done using actual people with actual histories of being recipients of corporal punishment. Yet, and I feel I have to repeat myself, you see your personal anecdotal evidence as of greater value than peer review studies.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 3 Replies
- 1741 Views
-
Last post by SlowJoe
-
- 7 Replies
- 2338 Views
-
Last post by Sirhaden1
-
- 0 Replies
- 984 Views
-
Last post by Kung-fu Hillbilly
-
- 16 Replies
- 2740 Views
-
Last post by Province
-
- 0 Replies
- 1267 Views
-
Last post by Artisan
-
- 3 Replies
- 2094 Views
-
Last post by Bitte_Kein_Lexus
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: barang_TK, Google [Bot], Kammekor, kgbagent, PSD-Kiwi, Username Taken and 724 guests