Brody wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 8:01 pm

Phnom Poon wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 7:52 pm so they say

That's a weak argument.
It's a Trumpian shortcut to thinking.
"Fake news!" and all that.

So Brody, seriously, apart from just wanting an argument,
-what is your point? You haven't said anything about that yet.

Are you saying that the claim made by TIME when selling this expensive coffee table number,
ie that this is the "100 most influential photographs that changed the world", is an accurate statement?

And/or? That it is not US-centric and globally unrepresentative ??

serious Qs. If we are going to fight to the death tonight, it may as well be about something.
chuckle
(and because, quite frankly i am not in the mood for the way this is going at the moment - 'i never am!)

SternAAlbifrons wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 8:39 pm -what is your point? You haven't said anything about that yet.

Yes I have. I was merely pointing out that the arbiters were comprised of an international group of editors.

I never stated whether or not I thought the photos were worthy of being listed as "The Most Influential....."

I called into question the sentiment that TIME was being inherently biased.

You seem to think that they are......they might be and they might not be.