I just love all of these holier than thou shirt lifters who rush to condemn someone who has views opposing theirs.

I personally think that homosexuality is not normal but do not condemn anyone for being so. What is normal about sticking your penis up someone's backside. In my mind, a very unhygienic, unnatural action. If that is your choice in life then so be it but I am entitled to this view as are billions of other people.

However, "free thinking Liberals" will only ever see their side and never accept that anyone else is entitled to a view.

And it is sad that these free thinking Liberals do not even read what has been posted. My opinion was that if this was his view then he should just walk away from rugby rather than take it to court. But of course you stopped reading as soon as you realised I was not buttered on your side.

So just what is Freedom of Speech then?

Hey slow down 101.
I think you will find most posters are simply making their point.
No need to get agro, or abusive.
We got all kinds here. All kinds.

AB101 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2019 4:03 am There is nothing wrong with being a homosexual, it is a physical and mental fact.

AB101 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2019 3:30 pm I personally think that homosexuality is not normal...

Err...

AB101 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2019 3:30 pm I just love all of these holier than thou shirt lifters who rush to condemn someone who has views opposing theirs.

I personally think that homosexuality is not normal but do not condemn anyone for being so. What is normal about sticking your penis up someone's backside. In my mind, a very unhygienic, unnatural action. If that is your choice in life then so be it but I am entitled to this view as are billions of other people.

However, "free thinking Liberals" will only ever see their side and never accept that anyone else is entitled to a view.

And it is sad that these free thinking Liberals do not even read what has been posted. My opinion was that if this was his view then he should just walk away from rugby rather than take it to court. But of course you stopped reading as soon as you realised I was not buttered on your side.

So just what is Freedom of Speech then?

"I just love all of these holier than thou shirt lifters who rush to condemn someone who has views opposing theirs". If one disagrees with your homophobia then one must be a homosexual.

Perhaps it is not that free thinking Liberals are not all gay as you suggest, but more tolerant and accepting than you are. The rugby player has a contract, he broke the terms of the contract, even right-wing neo-fascists are obligated to follow the terms of contracts they sign. It has nothing to do with anal sex. It has nothing to do with being racist, left-handed or whether one served proudly in the service of their adopted country. It has to do with contract law.

AB101 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2019 3:30 pm I just love all of these holier than thou shirt lifters who rush to condemn someone who has views opposing theirs.

I personally think that homosexuality is not normal but do not condemn anyone for being so. What is normal about sticking your penis up someone's backside. In my mind, a very unhygienic, unnatural action. If that is your choice in life then so be it but I am entitled to this view as are billions of other people.

However, "free thinking Liberals" will only ever see their side and never accept that anyone else is entitled to a view.

And it is sad that these free thinking Liberals do not even read what has been posted. My opinion was that if this was his view then he should just walk away from rugby rather than take it to court. But of course you stopped reading as soon as you realised I was not buttered on your side.

So just what is Freedom of Speech then?

1. It occurs naturally throughout the animal kingdom. Ergo facto, it is "natural".

2. The view you've put forth throughout this thread is that his right to freedom of speech is being infringed upon, and that those who approve of what has happened are therefore in favor of infringing on other people's freedom of speech. This simply isn't true. He has his freedom of speech and has exercised it.

3. You are conflating (I suspect deliberately) people expressing disgust at his view point with people thinking that he isn't entitled to his views. Of course he's entitled to his views, and of course other people are entitled to be disgusted by him.

4. He is a raging hypocrite and religion has nothing to do with his stance. He works on the Sabbath, he has tattoos, he judges others, he wears clothes made of mixed fabrics, the list goes on and on. Do you really think he's out there condemning gay people because he thinks that's what Jesus would want him to do? Jfc.

Anthony's Weiner wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2019 4:02 pm

AB101 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2019 3:30 pm I just love all of these holier than thou shirt lifters who rush to condemn someone who has views opposing theirs.

I personally think that homosexuality is not normal but do not condemn anyone for being so. What is normal about sticking your penis up someone's backside. In my mind, a very unhygienic, unnatural action. If that is your choice in life then so be it but I am entitled to this view as are billions of other people.

However, "free thinking Liberals" will only ever see their side and never accept that anyone else is entitled to a view.

And it is sad that these free thinking Liberals do not even read what has been posted. My opinion was that if this was his view then he should just walk away from rugby rather than take it to court. But of course you stopped reading as soon as you realised I was not buttered on your side.

So just what is Freedom of Speech then?

"I just love all of these holier than thou shirt lifters who rush to condemn someone who has views opposing theirs". If one disagrees with your homophobia then one must be a homosexual.

Perhaps it is not that free thinking Liberals are not all gay as you suggest, but more tolerant and accepting than you are. The rugby player has a contract, he broke the terms of the contract, even right-wing neo-fascists are obligated to follow the terms of contracts they sign. It has nothing to do with anal sex. It has nothing to do with being racist, left-handed or whether one served proudly in the service of their adopted country. It has to do with contract law.

He can have different opinions. I accept that. I don't accept a wealthy man with millions in assets asking for money from a public stupid enough to give it even when they have to wait for a refund before giving to his reinvented plea for money. And I have issue with people doing it when they know without doubt he had millions in assets and was on a multi million dollar contract. What hope for humans if this is how millions of people think and act?

He now has raised $2m

https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/people/ ... au-thanks/


Totally pisses me off.

Anthony's Weiner wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2019 4:02 pm
Perhaps it is not that free thinking Liberals are not all gay as you suggest, but more tolerant and accepting than you are. The rugby player has a contract, he broke the terms of the contract, even right-wing neo-fascists are obligated to follow the terms of contracts they sign. It has nothing to do with anal sex. It has nothing to do with being racist, left-handed or whether one served proudly in the service of their adopted country. It has to do with contract law.

Thanks weiner. Perhaps you can quote me where I have said he should be allowed to play. No of course you can't because I said he should walk away from Rugby if those are his views.

Yet another "member" who does not read posts but just wants to spout his opinions and shout down others.

As for the anal sex etc. it was cptrelentless who started the homophobic, attack suggesting latent homosexuality amongst other things. But of course, I do not see you picking him up for his actions.

Same old same old.

And at least Violet can see the bigger picture. He is rich, he has views, he should just walk away from rugby if that is how he feels.

AB101 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2019 3:30 pm I just love all of these holier than thou shirt lifters who rush to condemn someone who has views opposing theirs.

You are implying that everyone here, or most folks, "condemning" the probable closeted homo Folau are gay themselves? You're adorable

AB101 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2019 3:30 pmI personally think that homosexuality is not normal but do not condemn anyone for being so. What is normal about sticking your penis up someone's backside. In my mind, a very unhygienic, unnatural action. If that is your choice in life then so be it but I am entitled to this view as are billions of other people.

Yes, you are entitled to your views. No one is denying you your views, you are allowed to continue to be perplexed by, and rather overtly interested in, gay butt sex which happens, usually, in the privacy of people's homes. How does that even bother you? Why is it on your mind? Never shagged a girl up the butt? You haven't lived....

AB101 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2019 3:30 pmHowever, "free thinking Liberals" will only ever see their side and never accept that anyone else is entitled to a view.

Free thinking, what like, as opposed to narrow-minded, reactionary, nosey and enraged about shit that's none of your business?

AB101 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2019 3:30 pmAnd it is sad that these free thinking Liberals do not even read what has been posted. My opinion was that if this was his view then he should just walk away from rugby rather than take it to court. But of course you stopped reading as soon as you realised I was not buttered on your side.

Nonsense, you yourself are uncomfortable about gay butt sex and, I assume, pink latex, poppers and feather boas on grown men. And you are outraged that a bloke, Folau in this case, is not afforded his right to Freedom of Speech, even though it doesn't apply to his case as has been pointed out to you. You therefore feel your freedom of speech is somehow infringed upon by association of opinion, I guess, I don't really know what's rattling about in your mind.

And to demonstrate that point, see the specimen below:

AB101 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2019 3:30 pmSo just what is Freedom of Speech then?

Freedom of Speech is essentially your right to not be prosecuted by the government for expressing your opinion etc etc. BUT it does not protect you from being called out as a total bellend for expressing your opinion. In simple terms: you can say what you want, government can't hang you. But other people can tell you to sod off, and you can't whine about it.

Also, you're beginning to sound like a snowflake.

AB101 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2019 3:30 pm I just love all of these holier than thou shirt lifters who rush to condemn someone who has views opposing theirs.

I personally think that homosexuality is not normal but do not condemn anyone for being so. What is normal about sticking your penis up someone's backside. In my mind, a very unhygienic, unnatural action. If that is your choice in life then so be it but I am entitled to this view as are billions of other people.

Um, straight people also do this. No need to denigrate "shirt lifters".

In any case, as has been pointed out, this case is all about Folau breaking the terms of his contract after being give a second chance the first time, after which he solemnly promised to walk away from the game if he caused them any further grief. Such a liar, hypocrite and grandstanding fuckwit.