IMF Says U.S. Is Paying China Tariff Costs, Contrary to Trump’s Claim

Yeah, that place out 'there'. Anything not really Cambodia related should go here.
User avatar
yong
Expatriate
Posts: 4267
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2018 12:03 pm
Reputation: 2769
Thailand

IMF Says U.S. Is Paying China Tariff Costs, Contrary to Trump’s Claim

Post by yong »

IMF Says U.S. Is Paying China Tariff Costs, Contrary to Trump’s Claim
By Brendan Murray May 23, 2019, 8:00 PM GMT+7 on May 23, 2019, 11:58 PM GMT+

Companies in the U.S. are paying almost all the costs from Donald Trump’s tariffs on Chinese imports, IMF researchers said in findings that contradict the president’s assertions that China is footing the bill.

IMF researchers found “tariff revenue collected has been borne almost entirely by U.S. importers,” according to the International Monetary Fund’s blog post released Thursday.

“Some of these tariffs have been passed on to U.S. consumers, like those on washing machines, while others have been absorbed by importing firms through lower profit margins.”

The report concludes what most private economists have argued for months: that China doesn’t pay U.S. tariffs, American consumers and companies do. “Consumers in the U.S. and China are unequivocally the losers from trade tensions,” the IMF paper said.

It’s rare for the IMF to disagree with its largest shareholder, and the paper was released just as the rhetoric in Trump’s trade war with China reaches a boiling point.

"For 10 months, China has been paying Tariffs to the USA of 25% on 50 Billion Dollars of High Tech, and 10% on 200 Billion Dollars of other goods," Mr Trump tweeted on May 5.

Trade talks between Beijing and Washington stalled this month as Mr Trump accused China of backing out of a deal that was taking shape.

In response, Trump increased levies on US$200 billion (S$276 billion) in Chinese imports to 25 per cent from 10 per cent, prompting retaliation from Beijing.

According to a separate report on Thursday from researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the US' 15 percentage point increase in tariffs will result in an annual cost of US$831 per American household, about double the bill on Mr Trump's 2018 tariffs.

The US has also released a list of about US$300 billion in Chinese goods that could face additional tariffs, including clothing, toys and mobile phones. Those levies, if imposed, would cover essentially all Chinese imports and hit a broader swathe of American households.

Earlier this month, White House economic director Larry Kudlow acknowledged "both sides will suffer" from the widening US-China trade war, while predicting that the impact on US jobs and growth from higher tariffs on Chinese goods would be "de minimis".

Image

On Thursday, China blamed Washington for wrecking the talks and insisted the US must alter its "wrong practices" before negotiations can resume.

Financial markets, meanwhile, are slumping amid prospects for a long dispute between the world's two largest economies.

Co-written by IMF chief economist Gita Gopinath, the paper says a trade war that escalates with all the threatened tariffs will subtract about a third of a percentage point from global gross domestic product, "with half stemming from business and market confidence effects".

"This type of scenario is among the reasons why we referred to 2019 as a delicate year for the global economy," the IMF economists wrote.

In April, the fund cut its 2019 forecast for global growth to 3.3 per cent, the lowest since the financial crisis, citing higher tariffs weighing on trade and weakness in some advanced economies.
User avatar
Clutch Cargo
Expatriate
Posts: 7740
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2018 3:09 pm
Reputation: 5999
Cambodia

Re: IMF Says U.S. Is Paying China Tariff Costs, Contrary to Trump’s Claim

Post by Clutch Cargo »

"For 10 months, China has been paying Tariffs to the USA of 25% on 50 Billion Dollars of High Tech, and 10% on 200 Billion Dollars of other goods," Mr Trump tweeted on May 5.
Of course that's the line that Trump has been banging on about for some time now. No doubt there are probably many that believe it and the IMF and media are correct in pointing out that it's the US consumer that ends up paying coz in most instances US companies are passing on the extra costs. However, if people think Trump is really that clueless and doesn't know what he's talking about, I think they are naive and wrong.

Have a look at a more recent Trump tweet:

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
We are right where we want to be with China. Remember, they broke the deal with us & tried to renegotiate. We will be taking in Tens of Billions of Dollars in Tariffs from China. Buyers of product can make it themselves in the USA (ideal), or buy it from non-Tariffed countries...
4:06 AM - May 13, 2019

Let's remember that Trump is still hoping to get a trade deal across with China. That would be the least disruptive option if he can bring it about. If it doesn't come about, the tariffs remain in place or even increase on an ongoing basis for perhaps a very long time or even forever.

If that happens, US companies will (if some are not already doing so) be looking for alternate supply lines and there are plenty of candidates in SE Asia apart from China that could do it in time. If he doesn't pull the deal off, I think that's his long term game plan.. That would redistribute the trade balance with China and decrease the dependency. More on reshaping supply chains here: https://www.ft.com/content/bb3a3546-7c3 ... 85092ab560

Australia is an opposite situation to the US in that it exports more to China than it imports...mainly iron ore and coal. In 2017-18, 31% of total Australia's exports went to China...the next largest was Japan with 13%. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-01-15/ ... a/10716240

And when Australia banned Huawei from its 5G network, guess what happened? Soon after Australian wine was held up by customs clearance delays and then coal shipments were similarly affected. Now, China haven't come out and said this is retaliation..rather they are denying it is politically motivated. Coincidence? I'm sure its not. China knows it has the upper hand with Australia on trade and is prepared to wield its power. Of course if Australia was smart it would reduce its dependency also and move to re-balance it's trade with China vis a vie other countries.
User avatar
hanno
Expatriate
Posts: 6774
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 12:37 pm
Reputation: 3142
Location: Phnom Penh
Contact:
Germany

Re: IMF Says U.S. Is Paying China Tariff Costs, Contrary to Trump’s Claim

Post by hanno »

Just watching the President in Tokyo. I largely stay out of the whole Trump debate but he certainly comes across as a narcissistic, lying moron...
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: angsta, Art, barang_TK, Bing [Bot], IraHayes, John Bingham, Ozinasia, Province, Spigzy, xandreu and 488 guests