kaputt wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 6:46 pm Inside the Boeing 737 max 8 plane Simulator



Ok, i know you'll fix this Boeing because you also have no alternative or shut business altogether. That won't happen.

Too little competition and too many orders make passengers, pilots and stewardesses guinea pigs on the new patches.

I for myself just cancelled a Malaysia Airline flight from Phnom Penh to Kuala Lumpur on a 737-800 which is not the 737 max 8 but equally risky in my opinion. FlyEgypt had to do an emergency landing just a short while ago with the 737-800 on its flight from Egypt to Graz in Austria because of an explosion in the back of the plane and the fact that the pilots hardly kept the plane in the air. The symptoms were clearly similar to the two crashes of the 737-max 8 but almost totally ignored by the media.
I will also abstain from flying a 787 Dreamliner (which i flew several times in the past 12 month) and will not step inside the new 777 either. I completely lost faith in the Quality Boeing delivers. Their aim seems to please shareholders but my life is more important to me than a few bucks more on the back of several hundred dead people used as quinea pigs.

Still posting utter garbage, I see. Please enlighten me as to what is so bloody risky about the -800, in your opinion.
Much of what you claim about the technical aspects seems to be based on youtube type 'experts'. flight simmers, etc, who profess lots of knowledge without actually referring to or having access to actual data. Just their own interpretation of the facts.

In one of the newspaper reports that you quoted early on, the editorial effort had dumbed the technical details down such that the lowest common denominator of laymen might start to appreciate what was being explained. Sadly, they got some details wrong, and that simply goes on to mire the whole thing in half baked ideas and what can largely be described as bollocks.

So please, Stop talking bollocks. Do a little research, aim to learn something about the subject, and then write from a properly informed position. It's not gone unnoticed that like the laziest of reporters for the rather mediocre tabloids, you fail to answer any challenge on the crap you write. It's like watching one of those dreadful, cheap made for tv dramas; embellishing the events because they don't really understand how dramatic the facts really were.
People like you crawl out of the woodwork whenever some tragedy occurs like this, and instead of uncovering or reporting on the facts, they report their own heavily biased and often plagiarised opinions as if its gospel. Sadly, there are plenty of weak minds who will lap it all up in the same way that they get engrossed in their favourite soaps, failing to separate fact from fiction.

It wouldn't surprise me to learn that your continuing anti-American sentiment is linked to the flag you have selected in your profile. However, what you are doing amounts to a major disservice to the victims of these two tragic events.

The only saving grace from your position as you express it is that you will remove any chance that I'd have to suffer your presence on a flight that I might be on.

Planes falling apart, are they? Once again, creating a story from flawed information.
Talk about a sick world when there are muppets getting air time without qualifying their claims.

It does not really surprise me that the big issues facing many flight crew rarely get the same level of exposure; these are concepts and problems that clearly are too difficult for the opportunist to comprehend.