Baker refuses to bake cake for gays

Yeah, that place out 'there'. Anything not really Cambodia related should go here.
User avatar
chorlton
Expatriate
Posts: 497
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2017 12:09 pm
Reputation: 59
Location: Location Location
Virgin Islands (Brit)

Re: Baker refuses to bake cake for gays

Post by chorlton »

davebodia wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2018 5:51 pm
chorlton wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2018 10:44 pm
davebodia wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2018 10:20 pm You attack my character - "great debate skills there" - because I called you a snowflake and mentioned how snowflakes believe every meme (you believing that meme being a perfect example, hence why I called you a snowflake). Your - "great debate skills there" - line is a passive/aggressive cut-down (attack) that you said just prior to saying it's wrong attacking people.

For me to provide counter-evidence, you first need to provide evidence; memes aren't evidence... no matter whose picture is on it.

This issue is a whole lot deeper than your assertion that the Bible was translated by a homo. That meme is basically implying that all of Jesus's teachings that condemn homosexuality were just a mistake or something misunderstood, which is even deeper suggesting Jesus wasn't real all-together. That meme is cutting down the entire existence of God and trashing on every believer that's ever existed. It's a failed tactic unbelievers use in trying to trivialize and invalidate the The Word of God. Even if the gay myth was true, it wasn't even him who translated it. He was the king and he appointed a team to do it. Think about it though... why would a gay dude who held the massive amount of power and clout he did, have left Jesus's teachings about homosexuality - his supposed lifestyle - in The Bible to be read by anyone? Another facet of it is that it's simply the homosexual movement in their unending attack on heterosexuality. This meme, which is probably believed on-the-spot by so many who avoid research like the plague, aka snowflakes, is just another attempt to normalize homosexuality by constantly suggesting that prominent figures of the past were homos. People will take poetic words and phrases which were commonly used in days long long ago such as, "retire to my chambers", aka gonna go chill at my pad, to mean something sexual in nature was occurring because in our language today, that comment would definitely illicit romantic thought.

Anyway, I read your page, here's one for you. https://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/w ... sexual.htm
read it and dismissed it because it doesn't match your preconceived ideas then searched with confirmation bias for a link to a site that did. good job free thinking human

tell me sir, what would it take for you to change your mind about your religion?
if the answer is nothing then youre a hypocrite

I attacked nobody
I will attack ideas especially bad ones
13 countries carry the death penalty for non belief
would you prefer it was 196?
My "preconceived ideas", "good job free thinking human", "I will attack ideas"; all passive/aggressive attacks of my character. You're a walking contradiction. As to your final question, yes... I do wish it was 196.

The faith that's needed to believe we're here on accident - evolution, is far greater than the faith needed to believe we're here by design - creation.
PM me if your pride demands you continue this hate filled preaching
wishing 3.5billion would be subjected to death penalty for not believing as you do is beyond tolerable reading
this isn't the place for ignorant theist assertions like AIG is
END
Last edited by chorlton on Mon Jan 08, 2018 6:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Tolerance towards intolerance is cowardice"
- Ayaan Hirsi Ali
User avatar
tightenupvolume1
Expatriate
Posts: 1446
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 10:29 pm
Reputation: 488
Location: london
India

Re: Baker refuses to bake cake for gays

Post by tightenupvolume1 »

Image

charlie
User avatar
davebodia
Tourist
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2015 1:03 pm
Reputation: 1
Cambodia

Re: Baker refuses to bake cake for gays

Post by davebodia »

chorlton wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2018 6:08 pm
davebodia wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2018 5:51 pm
chorlton wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2018 10:44 pm
davebodia wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2018 10:20 pm You attack my character - "great debate skills there" - because I called you a snowflake and mentioned how snowflakes believe every meme (you believing that meme being a perfect example, hence why I called you a snowflake). Your - "great debate skills there" - line is a passive/aggressive cut-down (attack) that you said just prior to saying it's wrong attacking people.

For me to provide counter-evidence, you first need to provide evidence; memes aren't evidence... no matter whose picture is on it.

This issue is a whole lot deeper than your assertion that the Bible was translated by a homo. That meme is basically implying that all of Jesus's teachings that condemn homosexuality were just a mistake or something misunderstood, which is even deeper suggesting Jesus wasn't real all-together. That meme is cutting down the entire existence of God and trashing on every believer that's ever existed. It's a failed tactic unbelievers use in trying to trivialize and invalidate the The Word of God. Even if the gay myth was true, it wasn't even him who translated it. He was the king and he appointed a team to do it. Think about it though... why would a gay dude who held the massive amount of power and clout he did, have left Jesus's teachings about homosexuality - his supposed lifestyle - in The Bible to be read by anyone? Another facet of it is that it's simply the homosexual movement in their unending attack on heterosexuality. This meme, which is probably believed on-the-spot by so many who avoid research like the plague, aka snowflakes, is just another attempt to normalize homosexuality by constantly suggesting that prominent figures of the past were homos. People will take poetic words and phrases which were commonly used in days long long ago such as, "retire to my chambers", aka gonna go chill at my pad, to mean something sexual in nature was occurring because in our language today, that comment would definitely illicit romantic thought.

Anyway, I read your page, here's one for you. https://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/w ... sexual.htm
read it and dismissed it because it doesn't match your preconceived ideas then searched with confirmation bias for a link to a site that did. good job free thinking human

tell me sir, what would it take for you to change your mind about your religion?
if the answer is nothing then youre a hypocrite

I attacked nobody
I will attack ideas especially bad ones
13 countries carry the death penalty for non belief
would you prefer it was 196?
My "preconceived ideas", "good job free thinking human", "I will attack ideas"; all passive/aggressive attacks of my character. You're a walking contradiction. As to your final question, yes... I do wish it was 196.

The faith that's needed to believe we're here on accident - evolution, is far greater than the faith needed to believe we're here by design - creation.
PM me if your pride demands you continue this hate filled preaching
wishing 3.5billion would be subjected to death penalty for not believing as you do is beyond tolerable reading
this isn't the place for ignorant theist assertions like AIG is
END
And on and on the infantile cut-downs go... I'm prideful, I'm hateful, I'm beyond tolerable, I'm ignorant... blah blah blah. You're not even able to have a sensible conversation. You have a belief that you promote and apparently that's fine. I have a belief that I promote but I'm hateful because I don't agree with yours. Smh, so typical of the alt-left. And AIG = American International Group, an insurance company - Googled it and still have no idea what else you could be talking about. So now we all know (as if we all didn't know already), you're an alt-left minion who changes his morals based on the latest perversion your favorite Hollywood idol promotes and you believe that everybody should do the same thing. And if we don't change our morals like the changing of the winds, we're somehow all sorts of backward and screwed-up.

As to a PM... not interested. You're so filled with hate and intolerance towards anybody who doesn't agree with you, it's better everybody sees.
User avatar
frank lee bent
Expatriate
Posts: 11330
Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 4:10 am
Reputation: 2089
United States of America

Re: Baker refuses to bake cake for gays

Post by frank lee bent »

you will have to wait about 5 days before he can reply.
User avatar
that genius
Expatriate
Posts: 4065
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2017 7:53 am
Reputation: 960
Sweden

Re: Baker refuses to bake cake for gays

Post by that genius »

So what's the verdict? Was King James gay? How about Abraham? Kinda wondered bout that dude...then there was Jonathan and David, deffo gay.
pczz
Expatriate
Posts: 3200
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 1:00 pm
Reputation: 797
Location: phnom penh
Great Britain

Re: Baker refuses to bake cake for gays

Post by pczz »

that genius wrote: Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:40 pm So what's the verdict? Was King James gay? How about Abraham? Kinda wondered bout that dude...then there was Jonathan and David, deffo gay.
Gays should be encouraged. Think about it, your in a room with 10 gorgeous women and 10 men. if 2 of the guys are gay your chances of scoring are 205 higher :beer1:
User avatar
that genius
Expatriate
Posts: 4065
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2017 7:53 am
Reputation: 960
Sweden

Re: Baker refuses to bake cake for gays

Post by that genius »

That only works if the women are not gay
pczz
Expatriate
Posts: 3200
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 1:00 pm
Reputation: 797
Location: phnom penh
Great Britain

Re: Baker refuses to bake cake for gays

Post by pczz »

that genius wrote: Sat Jan 20, 2018 1:59 pm That only works if the women are not gay
Well I am quite happy to take one of the lesbians DISCLAIMER the words in this response are not related to any actual perosn alive or dead and sny such similarity is mere coincidence and not intended to be something-ist in any fashion)
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post