Doco Rant
- Kung-fu Hillbilly
- Expatriate
- Posts: 4153
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 11:26 am
- Reputation: 4967
- Location: Behind you.
Doco Rant
I enjoy watching documentary films, or at least I did.
So many doco's these days are filled with overly dramatic voice overs, overused CGI, repeated information, excessive B Roll shots that could have been taken for completely different subject matter and films churned out with the same hollywood-like vaneer and little substance.
What happened to real investigation on the ground as apposed to writing predictable, well used scripts for a narrator to blast through in an afternoon studio session, capturing unique and original images instead of going into a digital library and pulling shots or engaging/knowlegable interviewers/hosts who have a a history involved with the subject matter. Where's the grittiness?
Apart from independents who often don't have the resources and the BBC, the rest is tosh. Nat Geo should be ashamed of what it has become.
Long shall I mourn the passing of David Attenborough.
End of rant.
So many doco's these days are filled with overly dramatic voice overs, overused CGI, repeated information, excessive B Roll shots that could have been taken for completely different subject matter and films churned out with the same hollywood-like vaneer and little substance.
What happened to real investigation on the ground as apposed to writing predictable, well used scripts for a narrator to blast through in an afternoon studio session, capturing unique and original images instead of going into a digital library and pulling shots or engaging/knowlegable interviewers/hosts who have a a history involved with the subject matter. Where's the grittiness?
Apart from independents who often don't have the resources and the BBC, the rest is tosh. Nat Geo should be ashamed of what it has become.
Long shall I mourn the passing of David Attenborough.
End of rant.
- StroppyChops
- The Missionary Man
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue May 06, 2014 11:24 am
- Reputation: 1032
Re: Doco Rant
It beats those new shows that are entirely based on YouTube clips. Barely.
Bodge: This ain't Kansas, and the neighbours ate Toto!
- Kung-fu Hillbilly
- Expatriate
- Posts: 4153
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 11:26 am
- Reputation: 4967
- Location: Behind you.
Re: Doco Rant
We've become a world of instant access fast hit info - damn the content.
Re: Doco Rant
In Nat. Geo's defense, how many times can you come up with an new angle to document the lives of wild animals? Haven't we all seen every aspect of African lion or elephant survival a thousand times?
Or the History Channel? Is it possible to show a "new" history of WWII? There have been so many documentaries on that subject from all points of view already? Can anyone really add anything new and insightful? Hasn't all the actual war footage been seen again an again?
Please come up with some new ideas for documentaries and post them here. I will find you multiple existing ones on that exact topic.
Or the History Channel? Is it possible to show a "new" history of WWII? There have been so many documentaries on that subject from all points of view already? Can anyone really add anything new and insightful? Hasn't all the actual war footage been seen again an again?
Please come up with some new ideas for documentaries and post them here. I will find you multiple existing ones on that exact topic.
- Kung-fu Hillbilly
- Expatriate
- Posts: 4153
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 11:26 am
- Reputation: 4967
- Location: Behind you.
Re: Doco Rant
The BBC seem to be able to find new and interesting behavioral habits of animals and capture those in equally interesting often cutting edge ways to give the viewer different perspectives of those traits. They spend time in the field, engage experts with a lifetime's experience on the subject matter and don't rely on gimmicky tricks and forced drama for the great results they get.
If I had to defend Nat Geo I'd only say with a shit load of programming now having to be filled with their many channels, they can't possibly give the time and provide resources required.
If I had to defend Nat Geo I'd only say with a shit load of programming now having to be filled with their many channels, they can't possibly give the time and provide resources required.
- JBTrain
- Expatriate
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 3:44 pm
- Reputation: 98
- Location: Phnom Penh
- Contact:
Re: Doco Rant
Perhaps, but occasionally some undiscovered footage does show up. This was an extraordinary series because we'd never seen color footage like it.Soi Dog wrote:In Nat. Geo's defense, how many times can you come up with an new angle to document the lives of wild animals? Haven't we all seen every aspect of African lion or elephant survival a thousand times?
Or the History Channel? Is it possible to show a "new" history of WWII? There have been so many documentaries on that subject from all points of view already? Can anyone really add anything new and insightful? Hasn't all the actual war footage been seen again an again?
Please come up with some new ideas for documentaries and post them here. I will find you multiple existing ones on that exact topic.
INDOCHINE A people's war in colour - 01:
Using Tapatalk
Re: Doco Rant
Vice TV is doing some interesting stuff in the short format.
The American PBS series Frontline is also good.
The American PBS series Frontline is also good.
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 1255
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 6:14 am
- Reputation: 3
- Location: Soon, Soon There
Re: Doco Rant
Thanks. I was going to suggest Vice TV too.Soi Dog wrote:Vice TV is doing some interesting stuff in the short format.
The American PBS series Frontline is also good.
Re: Doco Rant
Critique- The bit where they interrupt the narrator mid sentence so as to mimic a cliff hanger before the adverts come on. Then the narrator provides a summary of the programme after the ads for the benefit of latecomers. Even if you edit the ads out the show is still disjointed and messy.
There is some good content being produced, mostly by state owned media such as BBC and The Australia Network. Aussie Network is the only channel I regularly enjoy watching nowadays. I will miss it when it gets pulled next month. I also enjoy Engineering Programmes. Nat Geo was gracious enough not to stretch China's rail developments into a 10 part series. Big, Bigger, Biggest was a great series.
I'd recommend Foreign Correspondent for current affairs programming.
Re new perspectives: Taboos are constantly being eroded and there are many ways to spin a story. I like it when someone examines a theme rather than a time or place.
There is some good content being produced, mostly by state owned media such as BBC and The Australia Network. Aussie Network is the only channel I regularly enjoy watching nowadays. I will miss it when it gets pulled next month. I also enjoy Engineering Programmes. Nat Geo was gracious enough not to stretch China's rail developments into a 10 part series. Big, Bigger, Biggest was a great series.
I'd recommend Foreign Correspondent for current affairs programming.
Re new perspectives: Taboos are constantly being eroded and there are many ways to spin a story. I like it when someone examines a theme rather than a time or place.
Scarier than malaria.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 7 Replies
- 2730 Views
-
Last post by Freightdog
-
- 47 Replies
- 9052 Views
-
Last post by scott61
-
- 8 Replies
- 2306 Views
-
Last post by DaveG
-
- 24 Replies
- 4750 Views
-
Last post by pissontheroof
-
- 17 Replies
- 2880 Views
-
Last post by Chad Sexington
-
- 18 Replies
- 4960 Views
-
Last post by Bitte_Kein_Lexus