Doco Rant

Yeah, that place out 'there'. Anything not really Cambodia related should go here.
User avatar
Kung-fu Hillbilly
Expatriate
Posts: 4152
Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 11:26 am
Reputation: 4963
Location: Behind you.
Australia

Doco Rant

Post by Kung-fu Hillbilly »

I enjoy watching documentary films, or at least I did.

So many doco's these days are filled with overly dramatic voice overs, overused CGI, repeated information, excessive B Roll shots that could have been taken for completely different subject matter and films churned out with the same hollywood-like vaneer and little substance.

What happened to real investigation on the ground as apposed to writing predictable, well used scripts for a narrator to blast through in an afternoon studio session, capturing unique and original images instead of going into a digital library and pulling shots or engaging/knowlegable interviewers/hosts who have a a history involved with the subject matter. Where's the grittiness?

Apart from independents who often don't have the resources and the BBC, the rest is tosh. Nat Geo should be ashamed of what it has become.

Long shall I mourn the passing of David Attenborough.

End of rant.
User avatar
StroppyChops
The Missionary Man
Posts: 10598
Joined: Tue May 06, 2014 11:24 am
Reputation: 1032
Australia

Re: Doco Rant

Post by StroppyChops »

It beats those new shows that are entirely based on YouTube clips. Barely.
Bodge: This ain't Kansas, and the neighbours ate Toto!
User avatar
Kung-fu Hillbilly
Expatriate
Posts: 4152
Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 11:26 am
Reputation: 4963
Location: Behind you.
Australia

Re: Doco Rant

Post by Kung-fu Hillbilly »

We've become a world of instant access fast hit info - damn the content.
Soi Dog
Expatriate
Posts: 2236
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 8:53 am
Reputation: 5

Re: Doco Rant

Post by Soi Dog »

In Nat. Geo's defense, how many times can you come up with an new angle to document the lives of wild animals? Haven't we all seen every aspect of African lion or elephant survival a thousand times?

Or the History Channel? Is it possible to show a "new" history of WWII? There have been so many documentaries on that subject from all points of view already? Can anyone really add anything new and insightful? Hasn't all the actual war footage been seen again an again?

Please come up with some new ideas for documentaries and post them here. I will find you multiple existing ones on that exact topic.
User avatar
Kung-fu Hillbilly
Expatriate
Posts: 4152
Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 11:26 am
Reputation: 4963
Location: Behind you.
Australia

Re: Doco Rant

Post by Kung-fu Hillbilly »

The BBC seem to be able to find new and interesting behavioral habits of animals and capture those in equally interesting often cutting edge ways to give the viewer different perspectives of those traits. They spend time in the field, engage experts with a lifetime's experience on the subject matter and don't rely on gimmicky tricks and forced drama for the great results they get.

If I had to defend Nat Geo I'd only say with a shit load of programming now having to be filled with their many channels, they can't possibly give the time and provide resources required.
User avatar
JBTrain
Expatriate
Posts: 451
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 3:44 pm
Reputation: 98
Location: Phnom Penh
Contact:

Re: Doco Rant

Post by JBTrain »

Soi Dog wrote:In Nat. Geo's defense, how many times can you come up with an new angle to document the lives of wild animals? Haven't we all seen every aspect of African lion or elephant survival a thousand times?

Or the History Channel? Is it possible to show a "new" history of WWII? There have been so many documentaries on that subject from all points of view already? Can anyone really add anything new and insightful? Hasn't all the actual war footage been seen again an again?

Please come up with some new ideas for documentaries and post them here. I will find you multiple existing ones on that exact topic.
Perhaps, but occasionally some undiscovered footage does show up. This was an extraordinary series because we'd never seen color footage like it.

INDOCHINE A people's war in colour - 01:
Using Tapatalk
Soi Dog
Expatriate
Posts: 2236
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 8:53 am
Reputation: 5

Re: Doco Rant

Post by Soi Dog »

Vice TV is doing some interesting stuff in the short format.

The American PBS series Frontline is also good.
Milord
Expatriate
Posts: 1255
Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 6:14 am
Reputation: 3
Location: Soon, Soon There
Canada

Re: Doco Rant

Post by Milord »

Soi Dog wrote:Vice TV is doing some interesting stuff in the short format.

The American PBS series Frontline is also good.
Thanks. I was going to suggest Vice TV too.
User avatar
ali baba
Expatriate
Posts: 941
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 3:27 am
Reputation: 166

Re: Doco Rant

Post by ali baba »

Critique- The bit where they interrupt the narrator mid sentence so as to mimic a cliff hanger before the adverts come on. Then the narrator provides a summary of the programme after the ads for the benefit of latecomers. Even if you edit the ads out the show is still disjointed and messy.

There is some good content being produced, mostly by state owned media such as BBC and The Australia Network. Aussie Network is the only channel I regularly enjoy watching nowadays. I will miss it when it gets pulled next month. I also enjoy Engineering Programmes. Nat Geo was gracious enough not to stretch China's rail developments into a 10 part series. Big, Bigger, Biggest was a great series.

I'd recommend Foreign Correspondent for current affairs programming.

Re new perspectives: Taboos are constantly being eroded and there are many ways to spin a story. I like it when someone examines a theme rather than a time or place.
Scarier than malaria.
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Big Daikon, Bluenose, John Bingham, khmerhamster, Old8404, PSD-Kiwi, Spigzy and 366 guests