JM is a psychiatrist in Kansas.

you know, on the subject of visa revocation... i'm surprised that doesn't happen more often for petty reasons just to justify charging you for a new one.

My own views the less hyped this topic is the better. Better to drop it.

That would be my take as well

phuketrichard wrote: they sussed out KIR and JM as to who they are an where they work;

Then I guess that there'll be 2 bus trips to Sihanoukville claimed this time.

Hope there is not another invasion into his bar

It's a pity. JM is ,in my opinion, one of the good (best) ones. Its the reason I stay out of politics. Really its none of our business,and I don't care about the sheep bleating "but we contribute so we have aright to a say" crowd. Unless you have taken out citizenship, you have NO right to say anything and expect it to be taken into consideration. All our own countries have their little xenophobic mantra, in Australia, us kangaroofukers have a saying and you can see it on bumper stickers everywhere - "Australia - Love it or F**k off" and I'm sure you yanks and poms and saffies and kiwis and frogs and krauts and polacks etc, have something similar.If you really want to be taken seriously in ANY adopted country, then renounce your country of birth and become a citizen of your new home and be on the electoral role (or its equivalent). If you don't, no matter how you try to justify it, be it time in country or contribution to the country, you are really just a long term tourist and have no right to a say in how the country is run.
This link shows you how Australia views the situation of people who aren't eligible to vote

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-06-17/r ... ed/5528744

Disclaimer
This is my opinion and the opinion of the Australian, Cambodian American, English, South African, New Zealand, French, German and Polish governments, but is possibly not the opinion of the admin of CEO, so feel free to burn us, but not them LOL ! ( Damn,I worked so hard for those karma points too!)

I somewhat disagree. If you have a spouse/child who is a Cambodian citizen then I think your views do matter, with them as your proxy.

I also think you have the right to make a public analytical pieces on political policy. Not op-ed perhaps, but history and analysis shouldn't be restricted to the people who are citizens.

I think analysis done by someone who isn't a citizen can be a better option as they are not biased either way.