A Secret Trial in Britain
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 686
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2015 4:09 pm
- Reputation: 0
A Secret Trial in Britain
This nasty fellow deserves to be exiled to Rockall or, better still, to Pluto ...
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... -extremism
... however, the very term 'secret trial' makes one shudder. Even those tried for treason - like William Joyce, the best-known
"Lord Haw-Haw"* - had public trials.
* William Joyce had a County Cork snarl, nothing at all like the music-hall posh accent of Captain Baillie-Stewart, the
original "Lord Haw-Haw." Such is the indolence of journalists that the same moniker was used for Baillie-Stewart,
John Amery and William Joyce.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... -extremism
... however, the very term 'secret trial' makes one shudder. Even those tried for treason - like William Joyce, the best-known
"Lord Haw-Haw"* - had public trials.
* William Joyce had a County Cork snarl, nothing at all like the music-hall posh accent of Captain Baillie-Stewart, the
original "Lord Haw-Haw." Such is the indolence of journalists that the same moniker was used for Baillie-Stewart,
John Amery and William Joyce.
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 686
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2015 4:09 pm
- Reputation: 0
Re: A Secret Trial in Britain
A correction is needed. This is from COMMENT IS FREE in the Grauniad:
His trial wasn't secret. It was at the Old Bailey and I sat in the public gallery and listened to some of it.
There were reporting restrictions. He was actually convicted last month following a four week trial at the Old Bailey.The details have only just been made public yesterday.
That is true. But he didn't have a secret trial as stated in the article.
That's because any reporting could have prejudiced the subsequent trial of one of his followers. That trial has now concluded, so media restrictions have been lifted.
It's standard practice when it comes to related trials.
His trial wasn't secret. It was at the Old Bailey and I sat in the public gallery and listened to some of it.
There were reporting restrictions. He was actually convicted last month following a four week trial at the Old Bailey.The details have only just been made public yesterday.
That is true. But he didn't have a secret trial as stated in the article.
That's because any reporting could have prejudiced the subsequent trial of one of his followers. That trial has now concluded, so media restrictions have been lifted.
It's standard practice when it comes to related trials.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 14 Replies
- 3561 Views
-
Last post by Doc67
-
- 20 Replies
- 4886 Views
-
Last post by Doc67
-
- 1 Replies
- 1319 Views
-
Last post by CEOCambodiaNews
-
- 14 Replies
- 4371 Views
-
Last post by ramone
-
- 3 Replies
- 2155 Views
-
Last post by Bongmab69
-
- 1 Replies
- 1358 Views
-
Last post by Stiliko
-
- 12 Replies
- 2259 Views
-
Last post by Clutch Cargo
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Freightdog, IraHayes, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 610 guests