JP, your thoughts on closing Aboriginal communities?
Re: JP, your thoughts on closing Aboriginal communities?
neuropathic wrote: All of these expenses, of course, could easily be met by a mining tax, but oh no, those LNP cunce have scuttled that because Gina and co blackmailed them into doing so.
Spoiler:
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 1365
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 9:37 pm
- Reputation: 133
Re: JP, your thoughts on closing Aboriginal communities?
Just catching up on a few threads.
Really something I want to block out rather than think about to be honest...Bit of a ramble here, just typing as it comes out.
Firstly, unless one has spent considerable time in communities best to say nothing or your ignorance will be exposed (SC I know you have).
I've spent years in communities and visited some in WA, NT and SA. Gotta say the WA ones were the most functional that I saw. Even had glass windows instead of perspex. Then again, I wasn't there for long.
My initial reaction is that if anyone can find a community that is functional with solid governance and a robust commitment to proper education for kids, job creation for adults, zero alcohol/drug/substance abuse tolerance and proper law enforcement to weed out violence, child sex offenders, and damn thieves, then roll it out as a model to be copied. Might add a commitment to basic hygiene and caring for children's health too.
Well, there is nothing that I've ever seen that gives me the slightest notion that the above would be possible. There were 3 pillars that stood out, football, traditional business and welfare money. You could argue the merits of each, but until the others take priority nothing will ever change. Even if there was a 'model' community somewhere the inter-tribal feuds would be insurmountable so nothing would change.
I've met Tony Abbott and if he doesn't understand the issues he's without excuse. In all honesty, I've never in my life seen so much taxpayer money bucketed on such pointless causes and on such undeserving recipients, that might sound harsh,but it is the reality on the ground. I know too many that have houses in settlements and also houses in their homelands, all funded by taxpayers. Then there are the white elephants that have been built only to never serve their purpose, gross mismanagement of funds by administrators and outright fraud. I've even seen a tiny 'one family' community that had managed to get a school built and staffed for their 12 kids, only to see them spend inordinate lengths of time away due to family business, traditional business, football or whatever, leaving the two teachers twiddling their thumbs. This same place had the largest unspent budget of any school in the region, just fucking madness.
Never in my life have I met such dysfunctional, hopeless people - I saw things that totally shocked me and ultimately changed my opinion/outlook on what may be best for these communities. The only thing I saw in their culture that deserves any praise at all is the sense of family. However, that gets nullified by the useless waste of space family members who dedicate their lives to living parasitically off their more capable siblings etc and just compounds everybody's misery.
By the way, I'm talking very remote communities - the sorts of places that see very few Whiteys and at least when I was around, you needed a permit to enter many of them.
If the government mandate is to continue pouring money into these places then nothing will change, because that is what they've been doing for the last 40 years.
On the flip side of things, bringing feudal families together to live in remote communities as neighbours has been an abject failure. Unless you've spent some time in these places you've no idea of the rate of violence, and also how quickly it can escalate requiring schools, community stores and admin offices to go into lock-down mode.
My conclusion was/is that there is no answer for the problems in these places. There were a few who seemed to cope better than others, particularly those who were inclined to go to church oriented stuff but that cannot be said for many.
I'd suggest that if taxpayers had any idea what really goes on in these places they'd not be too pleased. The whole thing just gets glossed over with nice words and good intentions and a few myths thrown in, and that has been masking the cesspit for decades.
Really something I want to block out rather than think about to be honest...Bit of a ramble here, just typing as it comes out.
Firstly, unless one has spent considerable time in communities best to say nothing or your ignorance will be exposed (SC I know you have).
I've spent years in communities and visited some in WA, NT and SA. Gotta say the WA ones were the most functional that I saw. Even had glass windows instead of perspex. Then again, I wasn't there for long.
My initial reaction is that if anyone can find a community that is functional with solid governance and a robust commitment to proper education for kids, job creation for adults, zero alcohol/drug/substance abuse tolerance and proper law enforcement to weed out violence, child sex offenders, and damn thieves, then roll it out as a model to be copied. Might add a commitment to basic hygiene and caring for children's health too.
Well, there is nothing that I've ever seen that gives me the slightest notion that the above would be possible. There were 3 pillars that stood out, football, traditional business and welfare money. You could argue the merits of each, but until the others take priority nothing will ever change. Even if there was a 'model' community somewhere the inter-tribal feuds would be insurmountable so nothing would change.
I've met Tony Abbott and if he doesn't understand the issues he's without excuse. In all honesty, I've never in my life seen so much taxpayer money bucketed on such pointless causes and on such undeserving recipients, that might sound harsh,but it is the reality on the ground. I know too many that have houses in settlements and also houses in their homelands, all funded by taxpayers. Then there are the white elephants that have been built only to never serve their purpose, gross mismanagement of funds by administrators and outright fraud. I've even seen a tiny 'one family' community that had managed to get a school built and staffed for their 12 kids, only to see them spend inordinate lengths of time away due to family business, traditional business, football or whatever, leaving the two teachers twiddling their thumbs. This same place had the largest unspent budget of any school in the region, just fucking madness.
Never in my life have I met such dysfunctional, hopeless people - I saw things that totally shocked me and ultimately changed my opinion/outlook on what may be best for these communities. The only thing I saw in their culture that deserves any praise at all is the sense of family. However, that gets nullified by the useless waste of space family members who dedicate their lives to living parasitically off their more capable siblings etc and just compounds everybody's misery.
By the way, I'm talking very remote communities - the sorts of places that see very few Whiteys and at least when I was around, you needed a permit to enter many of them.
If the government mandate is to continue pouring money into these places then nothing will change, because that is what they've been doing for the last 40 years.
On the flip side of things, bringing feudal families together to live in remote communities as neighbours has been an abject failure. Unless you've spent some time in these places you've no idea of the rate of violence, and also how quickly it can escalate requiring schools, community stores and admin offices to go into lock-down mode.
My conclusion was/is that there is no answer for the problems in these places. There were a few who seemed to cope better than others, particularly those who were inclined to go to church oriented stuff but that cannot be said for many.
I'd suggest that if taxpayers had any idea what really goes on in these places they'd not be too pleased. The whole thing just gets glossed over with nice words and good intentions and a few myths thrown in, and that has been masking the cesspit for decades.
- StroppyChops
- The Missionary Man
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue May 06, 2014 11:24 am
- Reputation: 1032
Re: JP, your thoughts on closing Aboriginal communities?
Thanks JP - I didn't mean to drag up bad memories, sorry for that.Joker Poker wrote:Just catching up on a few threads.
Really something I want to block out rather than think about to be honest...Bit of a ramble here, just typing as it comes out.
Firstly, unless one has spent considerable time in communities best to say nothing or your ignorance will be exposed (SC I know you have).
I've spent years in communities and visited some in WA, NT and SA. Gotta say the WA ones were the most functional that I saw. Even had glass windows instead of perspex. Then again, I wasn't there for long.
My initial reaction is that if anyone can find a community that is functional with solid governance and a robust commitment to proper education for kids, job creation for adults, zero alcohol/drug/substance abuse tolerance and proper law enforcement to weed out violence, child sex offenders, and damn thieves, then roll it out as a model to be copied. Might add a commitment to basic hygiene and caring for children's health too.
Well, there is nothing that I've ever seen that gives me the slightest notion that the above would be possible. There were 3 pillars that stood out, football, traditional business and welfare money. You could argue the merits of each, but until the others take priority nothing will ever change. Even if there was a 'model' community somewhere the inter-tribal feuds would be insurmountable so nothing would change.
I've met Tony Abbott and if he doesn't understand the issues he's without excuse. In all honesty, I've never in my life seen so much taxpayer money bucketed on such pointless causes and on such undeserving recipients, that might sound harsh,but it is the reality on the ground. I know too many that have houses in settlements and also houses in their homelands, all funded by taxpayers. Then there are the white elephants that have been built only to never serve their purpose, gross mismanagement of funds by administrators and outright fraud. I've even seen a tiny 'one family' community that had managed to get a school built and staffed for their 12 kids, only to see them spend inordinate lengths of time away due to family business, traditional business, football or whatever, leaving the two teachers twiddling their thumbs. This same place had the largest unspent budget of any school in the region, just fucking madness.
Never in my life have I met such dysfunctional, hopeless people - I saw things that totally shocked me and ultimately changed my opinion/outlook on what may be best for these communities. The only thing I saw in their culture that deserves any praise at all is the sense of family. However, that gets nullified by the useless waste of space family members who dedicate their lives to living parasitically off their more capable siblings etc and just compounds everybody's misery.
By the way, I'm talking very remote communities - the sorts of places that see very few Whiteys and at least when I was around, you needed a permit to enter many of them.
If the government mandate is to continue pouring money into these places then nothing will change, because that is what they've been doing for the last 40 years.
On the flip side of things, bringing feudal families together to live in remote communities as neighbours has been an abject failure. Unless you've spent some time in these places you've no idea of the rate of violence, and also how quickly it can escalate requiring schools, community stores and admin offices to go into lock-down mode.
My conclusion was/is that there is no answer for the problems in these places. There were a few who seemed to cope better than others, particularly those who were inclined to go to church oriented stuff but that cannot be said for many.
I'd suggest that if taxpayers had any idea what really goes on in these places they'd not be too pleased. The whole thing just gets glossed over with nice words and good intentions and a few myths thrown in, and that has been masking the cesspit for decades.
I was genuinely curious about your perspective, I don't know that any other poster has also spent time in community, and in many ways I support the stance of the WA government with Abbott's backing. No doubt there will be comment about this not being a Christian perspective, but as you say, if you've not lived it, you really don't understand it.
The crunch is that a 'gazetted town' or community must by law have a certain amount of public service - school, policing, medical - and it's not uncommon for communities to have more public servants than other tenants. At some point, this is (no pun) untenable, especially when a feud erupts between two family groups, one moves away and establishes yet another community, and then screeches about being 'left behind' and accuses whatever politician is handy of lying about 'closing the gap'.
As a legitimate community member of the Yamatji people and a very close friend of both traditional land owners and station owners who cohabit incredibly well, I know a lot of black fullahs that also argue that funding for small communities is not helping, it's making the problems worse. Not that forcing aborigines into the fringes or into white FWC houses is the solution, but in my view its not a binary debate.
Anyway, just threw it up there as food for thought.
Bodge: This ain't Kansas, and the neighbours ate Toto!
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 1365
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 9:37 pm
- Reputation: 133
Re: JP, your thoughts on closing Aboriginal communities?
Spot on.StroppyChops wrote: The crunch is that a 'gazetted town' or community must by law have a certain amount of public service - school, policing, medical - and it's not uncommon for communities to have more public servants than other tenants. At some point, this is (no pun) untenable, especially when a feud erupts between two family groups, one moves away and establishes yet another community, and then screeches about being 'left behind' and accuses whatever politician is handy of lying about 'closing the gap'.
One other thing that just came to mind is how good these people are at playing politicians - they are masters of this. The trouble it that it helps very few and really exacerbates the whole festering sore.
- StroppyChops
- The Missionary Man
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue May 06, 2014 11:24 am
- Reputation: 1032
Re: JP, your thoughts on closing Aboriginal communities?
While the lawyers get richer.Joker Poker wrote:Spot on.StroppyChops wrote: The crunch is that a 'gazetted town' or community must by law have a certain amount of public service - school, policing, medical - and it's not uncommon for communities to have more public servants than other tenants. At some point, this is (no pun) untenable, especially when a feud erupts between two family groups, one moves away and establishes yet another community, and then screeches about being 'left behind' and accuses whatever politician is handy of lying about 'closing the gap'.
One other thing that just came to mind is how good these people are at playing politicians - they are masters of this. The trouble it that it helps very few and really exacerbates the whole festering sore.
Bodge: This ain't Kansas, and the neighbours ate Toto!
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 6:02 pm
- Reputation: 1
Re: JP, your thoughts on closing Aboriginal communities?
Abbott the stinking fucking fucker...
"Indigenous advisers slam Tony Abbott's 'lifestyle choice' comments as 'hopeless, disrespectful'"
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-11/a ... ce/6300218
"Tony Abbott's choice of words on Indigenous communities clumsy, insensitive, destructive"
http://www.theage.com.au/federal-politi ... 415s9.html
And to put it all in perspective.
"Indigenous advisers slam Tony Abbott's 'lifestyle choice' comments as 'hopeless, disrespectful'"
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-11/a ... ce/6300218
"Tony Abbott's choice of words on Indigenous communities clumsy, insensitive, destructive"
http://www.theage.com.au/federal-politi ... 415s9.html
And to put it all in perspective.
- frank lee bent
- Expatriate
- Posts: 11330
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 4:10 am
- Reputation: 2094
Re: JP, your thoughts on closing Aboriginal communities?
i have worked in some of the communities out west - past bourke and brewarinna.
those people do not choose to live that way.
they have no choices.
it is very grim indeed.
those people do not choose to live that way.
they have no choices.
it is very grim indeed.
- General Mackevili
- The General
- Posts: 18418
- Joined: Tue May 06, 2014 5:24 pm
- Reputation: 3408
- Location: The Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: JP, your thoughts on closing Aboriginal communities?
LoL, what the fuck! ? ! ?Kuroneko wrote:Spoiler:
That's the last time you're allowed to post ANY images unless it's a cute, fluffy kitten!
"Life is too important to take seriously."
"Life does not cease to be funny when people die any more than it ceases to be serious when people laugh."
Have a story or an anonymous news tip for CEO? Need advertising? CONTACT ME
Cambodia Expats Online is the most popular community in the country. JOIN TODAY
Follow CEO on social media:
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Google+
Instagram
"Life does not cease to be funny when people die any more than it ceases to be serious when people laugh."
Have a story or an anonymous news tip for CEO? Need advertising? CONTACT ME
Cambodia Expats Online is the most popular community in the country. JOIN TODAY
Follow CEO on social media:
YouTube
Google+
- frank lee bent
- Expatriate
- Posts: 11330
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 4:10 am
- Reputation: 2094
Re: JP, your thoughts on closing Aboriginal communities?
Having worked building public (ie. free or hugely subsidized) housing in poor, inner-city areas and also worked on government funded projects to attempt to improve living conditions on several Native American reservations throughout the US, I can say without a doubt that people DO choose to or choose not to live in that kind of squalor, regardless of their economic situation. Millions of similarly poor but responsible people manage to live with dignity despite their dire poverty.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 741 Views
-
Last post by Arget
-
- 23 Replies
- 5306 Views
-
Last post by willyhilly
-
- 0 Replies
- 1190 Views
-
Last post by Kung-fu Hillbilly
-
- 11 Replies
- 6207 Views
-
Last post by Clutch Cargo
-
- 21 Replies
- 9440 Views
-
Last post by capuccino
-
- 4 Replies
- 2486 Views
-
Last post by Foreigner
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], armchairlawyer, Fridaywithmateo and 870 guests