it's tough to argue pot should be 100% illegal.

BOFH · Post by **BOFH** » Wed Jul 08, 2015 4:23 pm

Here's how to test cannabis safely. Slowly, step by step. :-) The bong can naturally be substituted by a joint.

phuketrichard · Post by **phuketrichard** » Wed Jul 08, 2015 4:26 pm

BOFH wrote:
Therapist wrote:How does one go about experiencing what is in the gif?
Wait, don’t answer that.

LSD-25 my friend. The best substance in the world.

it was great but gave up on this years ago,( actually haven't tripped since the 70's) just too intense and LONG
my first out of body experience.

my fav is a shot of c followed by a shot of dilaudid

bongs are bad for ya. ask tommy chong

Therapist · Post by **Therapist** » Wed Jul 08, 2015 4:42 pm

phuketrichard wrote:
BOFH wrote:
Therapist wrote:How does one go about experiencing what is in the gif?
Wait, don’t answer that.

LSD-25 my friend. The best substance in the world.
it was great but gave up on this years ago,( actually haven't tripped since the 70's) just too intense and LONG
my first out of body experience.

my fav is a shot of c followed by a shot of dilaudid

bongs are bad for ya. ask tommy chong

Feds made an example out of Tommy.
Vlad's video post of C&C brought on some nostalgia.
Funny how Tommy was cell mates with Jordan Belfort and convinced him to write The Wolf of Wall Street in federal prison.

GonzoBobH · Post by **GonzoBobH** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 12:30 am

Advocatus Diaboli wrote:
Therapist wrote:that you would lose your mind
Honestly, I've never met a Marihuana addict that was sane.

Haha, AD. You got me good in the other thread, but I realize my mistake by observing this one.

dev·il's ad·vo·cate
noun
a person who expresses a contentious opinion in order to provoke debate or test the strength of the opposing arguments.

John Bingham · Post by **John Bingham** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 12:38 am

Therapist wrote:
BOFH wrote:
How does one go about experiencing what is in the gif?
Wait, don’t answer that.

Ketamine, LSD, Mushrooms etc. DMT is a bit different, that gives you proper hallucinations.

vladimir · Post by **vladimir** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 6:10 am

I always wondered why people in Cambodia take drugs. Reality is a freaky trip in itself.

randompeeps · Post by **randompeeps** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 5:45 pm

This thread started out with the silly trap that prohibitionists want to frame this debate in: If it's harmful it should be illegal, and if it's not then we can talk about legalizing it.

Whole thing is a strawman. We don't make things illegal simply because they can be dangerous, that's not how laws work, anywhere. If it was then there is a massive list of mundane activities that would be outlawed before weed would ever get a mention. More people in the UK die every year from horse riding accidents than they do from using ecstasy. That doesn't mean we say horse riding should be illegal, and it's rare (though not unheard of) for that statistic to be used as an argument for legalizing hard drugs.

The whole "debate" is a goddamn farce, and people are falling for it on both sides.

Anchor Moy · Post by **Anchor Moy** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 6:14 pm

randompeeps wrote:This thread started out with the silly trap that prohibitionists want to frame this debate in: If it's harmful it should be illegal, and if it's not then we can talk about legalizing it.

Whole thing is a strawman. We don't make things illegal simply because they can be dangerous, that's not how laws work, anywhere. If it was then there is a massive list of mundane activities that would be outlawed before weed would ever get a mention. More people in the UK die every year from horse riding accidents than they do from using ecstasy. That doesn't mean we say horse riding should be illegal, and it's rare (though not unheard of) for that statistic to be used as an argument for legalizing hard drugs.

The whole "debate" is a goddamn farce, and people are falling for it on both sides.

Get your point. See the thread about dangerous animals - dogs and cows should be illegal.
https://cambodiaexpatsonline.com/asinine ... t5396.html
(Not to mention cars or guns.)

Therapist · Post by **Therapist** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 7:03 pm

Anchor Moy wrote:
randompeeps wrote:This thread started out with the silly trap that prohibitionists want to frame this debate in: If it's harmful it should be illegal, and if it's not then we can talk about legalizing it.

Whole thing is a strawman. We don't make things illegal simply because they can be dangerous, that's not how laws work, anywhere. If it was then there is a massive list of mundane activities that would be outlawed before weed would ever get a mention. More people in the UK die every year from horse riding accidents than they do from using ecstasy. That doesn't mean we say horse riding should be illegal, and it's rare (though not unheard of) for that statistic to be used as an argument for legalizing hard drugs.

The whole "debate" is a goddamn farce, and people are falling for it on both sides.
Get your point. See the thread about dangerous animals - dogs and cows should be illegal.
https://cambodiaexpatsonline.com/asinine ... t5396.html
(Not to mention cars or guns.)

Polemicist, evil genius, or uber-troll, maybe AD should be in politics.

Anchor Moy · Post by **Anchor Moy** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 8:07 pm

Politics have nothing to do with logic.
Making laws on what the electorate want to hear is more important than facts or figures, in every country.

it's tough to argue pot should be 100% illegal.

Re: it's tough to argue pot should be 100% illegal.

Re: it's tough to argue pot should be 100% illegal.

Re: it's tough to argue pot should be 100% illegal.

Re: it's tough to argue pot should be 100% illegal.

Re: it's tough to argue pot should be 100% illegal.

Re: it's tough to argue pot should be 100% illegal.

Re: it's tough to argue pot should be 100% illegal.

Re: it's tough to argue pot should be 100% illegal.

Re: it's tough to argue pot should be 100% illegal.

Re: it's tough to argue pot should be 100% illegal.

Who is online

Register/Login to CEO with your Social Media Account: