juansweetpotato wrote:

Samouth wrote:

juansweetpotato wrote:

Samouth wrote:

juansweetpotato wrote:Cause it feels good. Haven't you heard of the naturist movement samouth?
BTW people do that sort of stuff all over the world. Egyptian pyramids recently I heard. It is also a very conservative society.
I think the joke in all this is that the same people who are making a noise and throwing them out on societal morality codes are also keeping the poor in abject poverty so they have to actually sell their bodies to people they would never consider as sexual partners otherwise. Cambodians are not free to show titty in public, but they can fuck 10 guys a day because they need to support their family. Stinks of extreme hypocrisy. Not just a Cambodian perspective or problem.
They could be making more money online showing tits and ass, be safe from disease and abuse, but society doesn't allow it because they think it's dirty

I am not against with nudity. They can do it everywhere like on the island or wherever, but not at our sacred places like Angkor complex and pagodas. I am quite familiar with nudity. Note i can access to internet and read whatever i want.
If what you are claiming is right, i am so curious how come they haven't been kicked out for taking off clothes at a very sacred place in a Muslim country. This surprised me. I agree that being nude is really great and make you feel good. i have done it once and i like it.

Lol,

yes I understand the sacred part. The Egyptians were outraged, even though the tombs are 1000's of years old and not even part of the Muslim religion. At least AW is Hindu I think it was more about Muslim values than the tombs though.

You were quick. you quoted it before i deleted it. Just realised that i wrote too much personal stuff on here.

Ha ha, we can edit our posts if you want? BTW I added more detail to my post.

Samouth wrote:
It is fine. I don't feel embarrassed at all.

prahkeitouj wrote:I support your idea, Samouth.

juansweetpotato wrote:

Samouth wrote:
It is fine. I don't feel embarrassed at all.

Nice smile.

Samouth wrote:

vladimir wrote:Samouth, clothes were around during the time of Angkor and long before that. The apsaras were naked because the kings wanted them to be naked (well, topless, anyway).

You were completely wrong Vladimir. You have to prove what you are saying. Cambodians were topless until early 19 century.

Samouth wrote:

prahkeitouj wrote:I support your idea, Samouth.

hahaha thanks. Great you don't think i am a bad guy.

vladimir wrote:Samouth, clothes were around during the time of Angkor and long before that. The apsaras were naked because the kings wanted them to be naked (well, topless, anyway).

juansweetpotato wrote:Cause it feels good. Haven't you heard of the naturist movement samouth?
BTW people do that sort of stuff all over the world. Egyptian pyramids recently I heard. It is also a very conservative society.
I think the joke in all this is that the same people who are making a noise and throwing them out on societal morality codes are also keeping the poor in abject poverty so they have to actually sell their bodies to people they would never consider as sexual partners otherwise. Cambodians are not free to show titty in public, but they can fuck 10 guys a day because they need to support their family. Stinks of extreme hypocrisy. Not just a Cambodian perspective or problem.
They could be making more money online showing tits and ass, be safe from disease and abuse, but society doesn't allow it because they think it's dirty