phuketrichard wrote:sd i said it was a mistake to bring davids book into things. SO ur saying ur not as upset about little kids naked but only teenagers that have breasts naked?? get real!!!

I saw your photos and thought they were harmless. I had no comment to you on this thread until you brought up Harrisons book. so yes, there is some dividing line in age when such images become inappropriate. You were the one who seemed to think it was all good as long as you felt the photo was "artistic", which i disagree with. I won't say I know what age that line should be drawn at, but most people would admit such a line does exist and should be enforced legally.

So you think any parent should have the final say in what images of his/her children get exposed to the world? The state has NO responsibility to step in if some disgusting schmucks who happen to be fathers or step-fathers or legal guardians want to file share photos of their naked daughters with other, like-minded creeps? That doesn't sound reasonable to me.

We all wish there was no need for government and police to be involved in people's lives this way, but unfortunately, human nature often makes it necessary for them to intervene.

my brother used to and maybe still does , loved showing his photos of his little naked 1 year old body to his girlfriends and so did i ...they are embarrassing....but are you a fucking bogan or what...this sounds like a paedophile thread....use your common sense ....i want to hit you for being so stupid.. this sort of thread gets the peados juices flowing...WTF mods do your job....have not read any comments

it doesnt bear thinking about

We are adults and can discuss controversial topics like adults. All visual images are not allowed but all reasonable discussion and debate should always be allowed. Don't go crying to the mods if you can't handle discussion.

What's the next topic? "Does having sex with a woman without her consent always = rape?"

phuketrichard wrote: yes there site is libel ( a true cop out) but innocent images are just that
innocent

screw you for the cop out jab, it's us who would be out the money, potentially jailed, etc. not you. easy to stand there and pass snide judgement comments and such though isn't it.

on the subject of posting your own kids' pictures, also consider the geotagging on images and that such things can be used to track down your kids by freaks. it's been known to happen.

As a father of a 2 years old daughter, I surely do not appreciate some strangers taking photos of her naked; photographers or not! If you going to take photos of her and post it on the WWW, you must have me or my wife consent.

phuketrichard wrote:

badneighour wrote:my brother used to and maybe still does , loved showing his photos of his little naked 1 year old body to his girlfriends and so did i ...they are embarrassing....but are you a fucking bogan or what...this sounds like a paedophile thread....use your common sense ....i want to hit you for being so stupid.. this sort of thread gets the peados juices flowing...WTF mods do your job....have not read any comments

so sorry this thread excites you, perhaps time to go see someone about that

becareful what you say....I havent started a kiddy picture thread....

Soi Dog wrote:We are adults and can discuss controversial topics like adults. All visual images are not allowed but all should always be allowed. Don't go crying to the mods if you can't handle discussion.

next time you’re at a bar have a face to face chat with your mates about 'do naked photos of kids always = Pornography?' you can take a sample of pictures of nude children which you may consider aren’t pornographic ?

reasonable discussion and debate is great but around this topic....Anyone of sound mind knows the answer without reasonable discussion and debate on a troll subject.....If i was the mod I would ban the OP...