Why do you entertain this cunt? Just fucking ban him, he is nuts and dangerous.

John Bingham wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2017 7:32 pm Erik, I think I know you, you're a Belgian with Congolese roots, no?

More likely dynamite Congolese heads.

Motive seems to be confirmed here: loss of face, resentment built up over a long period of time in a violent man with alcohol abuse problems.

Man faces court after murdering police chief
Tue, 6 June 2017
Touch Sokha
A man who allegedly killed a commune police chief out of resentment on Friday in Tbong Khmum province’s Ponhea Krek district was placed in pre-trial detention for premeditated murder on Saturday.

According to a provincial police Facebook post on Saturday, the suspect, Nan Nak, 53, allegedly slashed Veal Mlou Commune Police Chief Seng Sokkem, 45, on the throat and face with a machete while the victim was on patrol with other colleagues. The suspect was arrested immediately at the scene.

A letter released by the provincial court the same day states that investigating Judge Hai Naiheng had issued a pre-trial detention letter ordering Nak to be held for premeditated murder.

Put Sraing, commune deputy police chief, said that the suspect resented the official for ordering him to go through a period of “education” after a domestic violence incident more than a year ago.
“Over a year ago there was violence in [his] family and our police called [him] for education at the station. It is a case of old anger,” he said.
http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/m ... lice-chief

willyhilly wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:45 pmWhy do you entertain this cunt? Just fucking ban him, he is nuts and dangerous.

If everybody likes a particular idea, it is -- more often than not -- uninteresting mainstream bullshit -- by the poor for the poor. It won't make you one dollar. If everybody hates the thing, it could indeed still be a mistake, but it could also be the next thing that will be taking over. You should read what the mainstream said about the internet in 1991. "Ban it. It is nuts and dangerous", and who the hell cares? By the way, someone who is really "nuts" is not really "dangerous", while someone who is "dangerous", is most likely a bit intelligent. Otherwise, he would not be "dangerous". Where are the rampant idiots who are truly "dangerous"? A thing like that does not exist. To cut a long story short, I do not feel insulted by you calling me a "cunt". I feel vindicated!

John Bingham wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2017 7:32 pmErik, I think I know you, you're a Belgian with Congolese roots, no?

Possibly, or also not. Why not? What I write here, is not something I keep secret. Why would I? People who know me ITR already know I think like that.

The West is a cesspool that can no longer handle criticism, but that does not change its true nature, does it? its true nature is a cesspool. "In God we trust and in nothing else" is actually a very dangerous statement. Islam is currently quite much like a boiling pot of lava. That is what attracts me. If you start demonizing something, the pot of lava may seek to burn it. So, yes, I can see the power in "hate preaching". That must be the so-called second "wave": All kinds of opportunists jumping on the occasion to promote their own interests by "hate preaching". But still, I just watch, while all of that is mostly happening by itself. I just describe what I see. Seriously. It is f*cked.

eriksank wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2017 9:16 pmYou should read what the mainstream said about the internet in 1991. "Ban it. It is nuts and dangerous", ...

Sources?

StroppyChops wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2017 9:26 pmSources?

Newsweek. 1995. Why the Internet will Fail.

Oh. I forgot Bill Gates. 1993:

"The Internet? We are not interested in it"
"the Internet is a passing fad that will go the way of the BBS."

eriksank wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2017 9:39 pm

StroppyChops wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2017 9:26 pmSources?

Newsweek. 1995. Why the Internet will Fail.

Oh. I forgot Bill Gates. 1993:

"The Internet? We are not interested in it"
"the Internet is a passing fad that will go the way of the BBS."

Your Newsweek citation is an article about Clifford Stoll, who is not mainstream media.

Your Bill Gates citation links to a Google Answers forum in which people ask "When did Bill Gates say this?" without a definitive response.

So, fail, really. Hey, I know, come up with some lengthy spiel with a lot of interesting words that kinda sound right, but don't for a moment stick to the topic. Troll.

StroppyChops wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2017 10:19 pmSo, fail, really.

At how many millions of dollars?

StroppyChops wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2017 10:19 pmHey, I know, come up with some lengthy spiel with a lot of interesting words that kinda sound right, but don't for a moment stick to the topic. Troll.

Look, not everybody understands what I say or do. I don't see that as a problem. Furthermore, I am quite used to that. We are simply a different social class in every way.

eriksank wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2017 11:51 pm

StroppyChops wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2017 10:19 pmSo, fail, really.

At how many millions of dollars?

That actually doesn't make any sense, even with the wink. I checked what you posted and it's absolute nonsense - ICBS, you fail. Most of the time.

eriksank wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2017 11:51 pm

StroppyChops wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2017 10:19 pmHey, I know, come up with some lengthy spiel with a lot of interesting words that kinda sound right, but don't for a moment stick to the topic. Troll.

Look, not everybody understands what I say or do. I don't see that as a problem. Furthermore, I am quite used to that. We are simply a different social class in every way.

So, all of your deflections and misdirections aside, staying on the topic at hand - your two citations are false, but you knew that when you posted them, hoping that no-one would actually check them. Nothing to do with understanding your BS or being of different social classes - you knew the information you were posting was not what you tried to present it as. You use a lot of pretty words, but a turd in a suit is still just a well dressed turd - as is most of your posting.