Facebook new terms
- phuketrichard
- Expatriate
- Posts: 16871
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2014 5:17 pm
- Reputation: 5775
- Location: Atlantis
Facebook new terms
These are very very important changes; what ever you now post on facebook is their's to use as they see fit and that INCLUDES all photographs, DATA and your IDENTITY !!!
http://photofocus.com/2013/09/09/facebo ... s-be-wary/The new Facebook Terms of Use have been modified to allow the company to sell virtually anything that is uploaded to the service, including all your photos, your identity and your data. Facebook has also explicitly removed the privacy protection from the commercialization rights. This means that any photos uploaded to Facebook may be sold, distributed or otherwise commercialized with no compensation to the photographer.
In a nation run by swine, all pigs are upward-mobile and the rest of us are fucked until we can put our acts together: not necessarily to win, but mainly to keep from losing completely. HST
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4193
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2014 8:05 pm
- Reputation: 17
Re: Facebook new terms
People will cry, and the world will go on. Gotta finance a server farm the size of a small city somehow.
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 7:15 am
- Reputation: 0
- Location: Sitting in the Shade
Re: Facebook new terms
This what my friends are posting on their pages :
Today, November 26, 2014 in response to the Facebook guidelines and under articles L.111, 112 and 113 of the code of intellectual property, I declare that my rights are attached to all my personal data, drawings, paintings, photos, texts etc... published on my profile.
For any commercial use my written consent is required at all times. It is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, broadcast, or to take any other action against me on the basis of this profile and/or its contents. The actions mentioned above apply equally to employees, students, agents and/or other staff under the direction of Facebook. The contents of my profile includes private information. The violation of my privacy is punished by the law (UCC 1 1-308 - 308 1 - 103 and the Rome Statute).
Today, November 26, 2014 in response to the Facebook guidelines and under articles L.111, 112 and 113 of the code of intellectual property, I declare that my rights are attached to all my personal data, drawings, paintings, photos, texts etc... published on my profile.
For any commercial use my written consent is required at all times. It is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, broadcast, or to take any other action against me on the basis of this profile and/or its contents. The actions mentioned above apply equally to employees, students, agents and/or other staff under the direction of Facebook. The contents of my profile includes private information. The violation of my privacy is punished by the law (UCC 1 1-308 - 308 1 - 103 and the Rome Statute).
I was born with nothing , and I still have most of it left.
ChessCube Account name is generalchat
ChessCube Account name is generalchat
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4193
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2014 8:05 pm
- Reputation: 17
Re: Facebook new terms
yeah... that does literally nothing.
by using FB you agree to the terms of service. claiming you do not doesn't exclude you from the contract of accepting said terms or service by your continued use. that's not how law works.
by using FB you agree to the terms of service. claiming you do not doesn't exclude you from the contract of accepting said terms or service by your continued use. that's not how law works.
- vladimir
- The Pun-isher
- Posts: 6077
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 6:51 pm
- Reputation: 185
- Location: The Kremlin
Re: Facebook new terms
How do you spell shit?
z...u...c...k...e....r....
z...u...c...k...e....r....
Jesus loves you...Mexico is great, right?
-
- Expatriate
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 8:32 am
- Reputation: 6
Re: Facebook new terms
I think he's donated over $1,000,000,000 (a billion, yes) of his fortune to various charities and do believe he is onboard with Warren Buffet's goal of trying to get the world's Billionaires to give away 99% of their net worth when they pass away, as even that 1% left is "enough" to leave to family/friends.vladimir wrote:How do you spell shit?
z...u...c...k...e....r....
I like Facebook and have been using it since it REQUIRED a .edu Email addy to sign up. Living half way across the world, it is a great tool to communicate with friends and family back home. I don't see a problem with Facebook or Mark Zuckerberg.
I'll give ya 500 Riel for it...
Re: Facebook new terms
I don't know really facebook, but I think its technically really shit.
the only good thing, that you can sort of control the level of privacy (public, friends, only you...)
think, this is enough to protect whatever you want to protect there..
od is right.
the only good thing, that you can sort of control the level of privacy (public, friends, only you...)
think, this is enough to protect whatever you want to protect there..
od is right.
- phuketrichard
- Expatriate
- Posts: 16871
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2014 5:17 pm
- Reputation: 5775
- Location: Atlantis
Re: Facebook new terms
agree with OD ( now thats just about a 1st)OrangeDragon wrote:yeah... that does literally nothing.
by using FB you agree to the terms of service. claiming you do not doesn't exclude you from the contract of accepting said terms or service by your continued use. that's not how law works.
u can post whatever u want, dont mean shit,
you post on FB u agree to THEIR RULES
In a nation run by swine, all pigs are upward-mobile and the rest of us are fucked until we can put our acts together: not necessarily to win, but mainly to keep from losing completely. HST
Re: Facebook new terms
Hell must be freezing over as I also agree...phuketrichard wrote:agree with OD ( now thats just about a 1st)OrangeDragon wrote:yeah... that does literally nothing.
by using FB you agree to the terms of service. claiming you do not doesn't exclude you from the contract of accepting said terms or service by your continued use. that's not how law works.
u can post whatever u want, dont mean shit,
you post on FB u agree to THEIR RULES
Don't like their policy don't use their services.
In support of facebook they also make their privacy policy and user agreements easy to access. Not hidden away like what a lot of sites do.
Re: Facebook new terms
I don't have a Facebook account but saw this and thought it may interest some folks.
It suggests some FB users can sign up to the legal action and possibly get a few hunner euro's if successful;
http://europe-v-facebook.org/EN/en.html
25/11/2014 - Facebook users all incompetent?
Facebook is trying everything it can to delay the largest European privacy class action ever filed (http://www.fbclaim.com). In this attempt, Facebook came up with countless arguments to delay the lawsuit filed at an Austrian court this August. It seems more than questionable whether the IT giant’s attempt at delaying will be successful, given the arguments presented.
Facebook is e.g. contesting that it’s users have the legal competence to assign their claims and thereby join the class action. In plain English: Facebook claims that it’s users have become younger or insane sometime after they have joined the social network – there is no other way how the users have lost their legal competence after they have previously agreed to the terms and privacy policy of Facebook when joining. Other claims by Facebook include, that only the Irish Data Protection Commissioner (DPC) may address wrongdoings by the company and that it is immune from the ordinary courts. This of course ignored the fact that executive government oversights (as done by the DPC), has nothing to do with a lawsuit before a court. Many other arguments were presented by Facebook, but Facebook did not agree to the publication of the submission. Details in the PDF below.
The arguments presented are in essence without merit or already rebutted in the lawsuit itself, but the submissions by Facebook seem to be part of an expected delay tactic. The court in Vienna will have to assess the submissions by both parties and will set a data for the first oral hearings. So for a more than 25,000 users from more than 100 countries have assigned their claims for the class action and another 50,000 users have registered to join.
And I thought this previous update was funny;
03/10/2014 - Facebook get's an English "Second Serving"
After Facebook Ireland has argued that it does not speak German we have send the court a certified translation of the lawsuit. Unfortunately it was not possible to quickly find an Austrian court certified translator for Gaeilge, which would have been our first choice for a translation, so we had to stick to English.
The positive side effect of Facebook’s delay tactics and the shortage of Gaeilge translators in Vienna: We are happy to now also provide English speakers with a full translation (PDF) of the original lawsuit.
The "second serving" will be done by the Viennese court within the next days.
It suggests some FB users can sign up to the legal action and possibly get a few hunner euro's if successful;
http://europe-v-facebook.org/EN/en.html
25/11/2014 - Facebook users all incompetent?
Facebook is trying everything it can to delay the largest European privacy class action ever filed (http://www.fbclaim.com). In this attempt, Facebook came up with countless arguments to delay the lawsuit filed at an Austrian court this August. It seems more than questionable whether the IT giant’s attempt at delaying will be successful, given the arguments presented.
Facebook is e.g. contesting that it’s users have the legal competence to assign their claims and thereby join the class action. In plain English: Facebook claims that it’s users have become younger or insane sometime after they have joined the social network – there is no other way how the users have lost their legal competence after they have previously agreed to the terms and privacy policy of Facebook when joining. Other claims by Facebook include, that only the Irish Data Protection Commissioner (DPC) may address wrongdoings by the company and that it is immune from the ordinary courts. This of course ignored the fact that executive government oversights (as done by the DPC), has nothing to do with a lawsuit before a court. Many other arguments were presented by Facebook, but Facebook did not agree to the publication of the submission. Details in the PDF below.
The arguments presented are in essence without merit or already rebutted in the lawsuit itself, but the submissions by Facebook seem to be part of an expected delay tactic. The court in Vienna will have to assess the submissions by both parties and will set a data for the first oral hearings. So for a more than 25,000 users from more than 100 countries have assigned their claims for the class action and another 50,000 users have registered to join.
And I thought this previous update was funny;
03/10/2014 - Facebook get's an English "Second Serving"
After Facebook Ireland has argued that it does not speak German we have send the court a certified translation of the lawsuit. Unfortunately it was not possible to quickly find an Austrian court certified translator for Gaeilge, which would have been our first choice for a translation, so we had to stick to English.
The positive side effect of Facebook’s delay tactics and the shortage of Gaeilge translators in Vienna: We are happy to now also provide English speakers with a full translation (PDF) of the original lawsuit.
The "second serving" will be done by the Viennese court within the next days.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 41 Replies
- 6907 Views
-
Last post by John Bingham
-
- 12 Replies
- 3516 Views
-
Last post by Freightdog
-
- 27 Replies
- 5833 Views
-
Last post by phuketrichard
-
- 26 Replies
- 3514 Views
-
Last post by orichá
-
- 6 Replies
- 2616 Views
-
Last post by phlezk
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], drozd, J. Visiting, Soriya and 621 guests