CEO take note, lucky ur not in the EU

cptrelentless · Post by **cptrelentless** » Tue Aug 14, 2018 7:37 pm

tightenupvolume1 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 14, 2018 7:32 pm
Username Taken wrote: ↑Tue Aug 14, 2018 7:29 pm
cptrelentless wrote: ↑Tue Aug 14, 2018 7:22 pm So you guys think it's ok to steal someone's work and stick it up on your own website to make some money off the back of it? This is copyright law.
Is your avatar your own photographic work? Or do you have permission from the owner?
exactly the point i was making.

charlie

Not making any money off it and it's not hosted in the EU but if the owner is reading this he can PM me.

tightenupvolume1 · Post by **tightenupvolume1** » Tue Aug 14, 2018 7:46 pm

do you mean the owner of the image of your avatar ?

charlie

that genius · Post by **that genius** » Tue Aug 14, 2018 8:15 pm

cptrelentless wrote: ↑Tue Aug 14, 2018 7:22 pm So you guys think it's ok to steal someone's work and stick it up on your own website to make some money off the back of it? This is copyright law.

So if a CEO poster posts a picture of a dog from an EU member country website, explain to us exactly how that makes money for CEO, please.

And who paid the dog his cut? Or the unknowing people some photographer made money out of? Nobody. No inconsistency there?

Copyright law has gone mad, just like capitalism. Fucking lawyers again, squeezing an already overwrung cashcow dry

Jesus, soon we'll need to pay to speak.

phuketrichard · Post by **phuketrichard** » Tue Aug 14, 2018 8:40 pm

Vlad once again trying to make this out to what its not;

this has nothing to do with making money, its stealing someone else's work without receiving permission to use said photo and nothing to do with the subject of said photo

“The posting on a website of a photograph that was freely accessible on another website with the consent of the author requires a new authorisation by that author,” the EU’s top court said in a statement.

NO MENTION of money

“The Court goes on to hold that, subject to the exceptions and limitations laid down exhaustively in that directive, any use of a work by a third party without such prior consent must be regarded as infringing the copyright of that work,” the court said.

More than once, people have requested to use a photo or 2 of mine and depending on what they are using it for, all i ask for is being credited as the photographer,,,

Sidewalker · Post by **Sidewalker** » Tue Aug 14, 2018 8:50 pm

In Thailand are more than 50.000 websites blocked, according Wikileaks See: https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Internet_Cen ... n_Thailand

tightenupvolume1 · Post by **tightenupvolume1** » Tue Aug 14, 2018 8:56 pm

phuketrichard wrote: ↑Tue Aug 14, 2018 8:40 pm Vlad once again trying to make this out to what its not;

this has nothing to do with making money, its stealing someone else's work without receiving permission to use said photo and nothing to do with the subject of said photo

“The posting on a website of a photograph that was freely accessible on another website with the consent of the author requires a new authorisation by that author,” the EU’s top court said in a statement.
NO MENTION of money

“The Court goes on to hold that, subject to the exceptions and limitations laid down exhaustively in that directive, any use of a work by a third party without such prior consent must be regarded as infringing the copyright of that work,” the court said.
More than once, people have requested to use a photo or 2 of mine and depending on what they are using it for, all i ask for is being credited as the photographer,,,

so did you get permission for your avatar ?

charlie

Steven · Post by **Steven** » Tue Aug 14, 2018 8:57 pm

It makes sense. You can better control the population when everyone is guilty of something and you have a legitimate excuse to shut down any website at your discretion.

John Bingham · Post by **John Bingham** » Tue Aug 14, 2018 9:23 pm

I think people are misinterpreting this, it's not about people posting photos on Facebook or forums etc, it's more about people taking professional photographers images and publishing them on their own sites without permission or accreditation. It's just updating copyright laws that have existed for a long time for online usage.

Post by **Jamie_Lambo** » Tue Aug 14, 2018 10:44 pm

tightenupvolume1 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 14, 2018 7:31 pm making money from somebodys work is another thing and i agree is wrong. This stupid law means all the memes on here are illegal, or at least on a site in europe

charlie

xxxxxxx · Post by **xxxxxxx** » Wed Aug 15, 2018 12:01 am

Why does only making money off someone else's work cause alarm? Why is it less wrong to freely copy music files or download movies that you didn't pay for off an unauthorized bit-torrent type website, thus depriving the artist/songwriter/screenwriter out of their deserved income?

CEO take note, lucky ur not in the EU

Re: CEO take note, lucky ur not in the EU

Re: CEO take note, lucky ur not in the EU

Re: CEO take note, lucky ur not in the EU

Re: CEO take note, lucky ur not in the EU

Re: CEO take note, lucky ur not in the EU

Re: CEO take note, lucky ur not in the EU

Re: CEO take note, lucky ur not in the EU

Re: CEO take note, lucky ur not in the EU

Re: CEO take note, lucky ur not in the EU

Re: CEO take note, lucky ur not in the EU

Who is online

Register/Login to CEO with your Social Media Account: