Worth the death penalty?

This is where our community discusses almost anything! While we're mainly a Cambodia expat discussion forum and talk about expat life here, we debate about almost everything. Even if you're a tourist passing through Southeast Asia and want to connect with expatriates living and working in Cambodia, this is the first section of our site that you should check out. Our members start their own discussions or post links to other blogs and/or news articles they find interesting and want to chat about. So join in the fun and start new topics, or feel free to comment on anything our community members have already started! We also have some Khmer members here as well, but English is the main language used on CEO. You're welcome to have a look around, and if you decide you want to participate, you can become a part our international expat community by signing up for a free account.
MrBen87
Expatriate
Posts: 82
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2022 8:34 am
Reputation: 44
Great Britain

Worth the death penalty?

Post by MrBen87 »

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-03-20/ ... /103607866

Interested to hear opinions and thoughts on this case.

In short: Vietnamese prosecutors have called for the death penalty to be handed to Truong My Lan.
She is accused of netting $18.8 billion in a financial scam.
Truong My Lan is also accused of bribing officials to hide her embezzlement.
User avatar
Yobbo
Expatriate
Posts: 1858
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2014 8:21 am
Reputation: 894
Australia

Re: Worth the death penalty?

Post by Yobbo »

You'd wonder how deep that goes into the rankings 8)
Tootsfriend
Expatriate
Posts: 1212
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2020 9:36 am
Reputation: 527
Australia

Re: Worth the death penalty?

Post by Tootsfriend »

What is the penalty for those officials that have accepted the bribes ?
User avatar
hdgh29
Expatriate
Posts: 324
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2019 12:50 pm
Reputation: 204
Location: siem reap
Contact:
New Zealand

Re: Worth the death penalty?

Post by hdgh29 »

Officials and corrupt business leaders in Vietnam are regularly given the death penalty for accepting bribes and involvement in shady dealings, including some previously high ranked government people.
The best thing about the death penalty in Vietnam is that it is executed (ok, bad pun) almost immediately after sentencing. I can never understand why murderers and rapists are held on death row in the US for like 20 years before being finally killed off. I accept the state needs to make sure that they are definitely guilty, but it doesnt take decades to decide that.
"I tried being reasonable. Didn't like it" (Clint Eastwood)
MrBen87
Expatriate
Posts: 82
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2022 8:34 am
Reputation: 44
Great Britain

Re: Worth the death penalty?

Post by MrBen87 »

hdgh29 wrote: Wed Mar 20, 2024 5:46 pm Officials and corrupt business leaders in Vietnam are regularly given the death penalty for accepting bribes and involvement in shady dealings, including some previously high ranked government people.
The best thing about the death penalty in Vietnam is that it is executed (ok, bad pun) almost immediately after sentencing. I can never understand why murderers and rapists are held on death row in the US for like 20 years before being finally killed off. I accept the state needs to make sure that they are definitely guilty, but it doesnt take decades to decide that.
Wow, learn something new everyday. I thought it was a significant thing but turns out it's quite "normal" in VN. Thanks for informing, will look into it more.
User avatar
newkidontheblock
Expatriate
Posts: 4468
Joined: Tue May 20, 2014 3:51 am
Reputation: 1555

Re: Worth the death penalty?

Post by newkidontheblock »

hdgh29 wrote:Officials and corrupt business leaders in Vietnam are regularly given the death penalty for accepting bribes and involvement in shady dealings, including some previously high ranked government people.
The best thing about the death penalty in Vietnam is that it is executed (ok, bad pun) almost immediately after sentencing. I can never understand why murderers and rapists are held on death row in the US for like 20 years before being finally killed off. I accept the state needs to make sure that they are definitely guilty, but it doesnt take decades to decide that.
What a big can of worms!

In the US, investigative shows have shed light on new DNA evidence exonerating prisoners of their crimes. Despite eyewitness testimony. Or testimony that is recanted years later. Often how much a person can pay for legal representation is how thorough a over defense will be mounted.

The legal system involves humans. They are flawed with their own biases and agendas. Prosecutors are under immense pressure from the public to solve cases and mete out justice.

The US justice system is supposed to be blind and impartial. Tilted towards saving every last one of the innocent.

At least my thoughts growing up under public education in the US.
User avatar
xandreu
Expatriate
Posts: 1876
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 11:37 am
Reputation: 1951
Great Britain

Re: Worth the death penalty?

Post by xandreu »

You often hear people calling for the death penalty for a variety of reasons, usually for the most evil, heinous of crimes. I'm surprised that there is a country which regularly gives out the death penalty for freud. I don't believe in the death penalty for any reason.

1. Most civilised countries laws are based on the sanctity of life. It is illegal to deliberately take someone's life except in extreme cases such as an act of war (even that is limited under the Geneva convention), self defence (where there was no other option) and in some countries, euthanasia. Other than that, the deliberate, planned taking of someone's life is illegal, and for a law to be respected, it must be seen to abide by itself.

2. I don't believe in 'an eye for an eye'. Killing someone because they themselves took someone else's life makes the law no better than the criminal. For a society to truly call itself civilised, the law must be morally superior.

3. For people who commit the most heinous crimes such as rape, murder, and crimes against children, there are fates worse than death. Most people who are sentenced to full-life sentences, who know they will never, ever be released, often commit suicide, or at least attempt to. I know I'd probably take my own life if I knew I'd never ever be free again.

4. Following on from 3, depending on how bad your crime was, especially if it involved children, you will spend every day of your life either in solitary confinement, or in fear of being attacked by other criminals. Again, this is why many take their own life, because it is seen as an easy way out. Why give them what they want? Why allow them the easy way out? If someone did something to my child, I'd rather know they were living every minute of every day of the rest of their life in abject fear, never knowing if there was crushed glass in their meal, never knowing when another criminal might take advantage of a guard looking the other way and deciding to up his credibility be being 'the one' that got to you, and aside from that, having to face themselves in the mirror every morning knowing exactly what they did, than simply being quickly put out of their misery and it's all over.

5. The law makes mistakes. Innocent people do get convicted. If they've been killed and it comes to light that they were innocent, well, tough luck. You might say that this only happens in rare cases, but that doesn't mean anything if it happens to a member of your family.

6. Once a criminal, famous because of the evilness of their crime, is dead, you never hear about them again. As an example, one of the most famous crimes in the UK was a couple - Myra Hindley and Ian Brady, who kidnapped and murdered several children in the 1960s. They both - but Myra especially (because she was a woman) regularly cropped up in the media over the following decades. Before Myra died, she (and her partner Brady, but again, Myra got the most attention because it's rare for a woman to do what they did) served as a reminder to everyone that if you do crimes like that, this is what will happen to you. She died in 2002 (in prison) so now, most young people are not aware of the story. On the contrary, we had a doctor (Doctor Shipman) who killed over 200 people but killed himself soon after being sentenced to life in prison, and therefore his crimes have largely been forgotten about, and only people of my generation are aware of the story. But we also have another guy, Ian Huntley, who murdered two schoolgirls, but despite many attempts at taking his own life, is still alive and therefore still crops up in the media from time to time, again, reminding people what will happen to you if you commit these types of crimes.

7, As the original story of this thread shows, once the death penalty is seen as an accepted punishment, where does it end? I don't think most people would agree with the death penalty for freud, but in a country where the death penalty has been 'normalised', not only are people given capital punishment for fraudulent crimes, but you're then not far off from governments killing people for political crimes, as a way of dealing with political rivals.

There are many other reasons why I don't believe in the death penalty but I think I've bored you all enough.
The difference between animals and humans is that animals would never allow the dumb ones to lead the pack.
User avatar
John Bingham
Expatriate
Posts: 13784
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2014 11:26 pm
Reputation: 8983
Cambodia

Re: Worth the death penalty?

Post by John Bingham »

$18.8 billion is definitely worth the death penalty. A lot of suckers get taken out for far less. 8-)
Silence, exile, and cunning.
User avatar
Random Dude
Expatriate
Posts: 1034
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2021 5:54 am
Reputation: 1143

Re: Worth the death penalty?

Post by Random Dude »

xandreu wrote: Wed Mar 20, 2024 11:53 pm You often hear people calling for the death penalty for a variety of reasons, usually for the most evil, heinous of crimes. I'm surprised that there is a country which regularly gives out the death penalty for freud. I don't believe in the death penalty for any reason.

1. Most civilised countries laws are based on the sanctity of life. It is illegal to deliberately take someone's life except in extreme cases such as an act of war (even that is limited under the Geneva convention), self defence (where there was no other option) and in some countries, euthanasia. Other than that, the deliberate, planned taking of someone's life is illegal, and for a law to be respected, it must be seen to abide by itself.

2. I don't believe in 'an eye for an eye'. Killing someone because they themselves took someone else's life makes the law no better than the criminal. For a society to truly call itself civilised, the law must be morally superior.

3. For people who commit the most heinous crimes such as rape, murder, and crimes against children, there are fates worse than death. Most people who are sentenced to full-life sentences, who know they will never, ever be released, often commit suicide, or at least attempt to. I know I'd probably take my own life if I knew I'd never ever be free again.

4. Following on from 3, depending on how bad your crime was, especially if it involved children, you will spend every day of your life either in solitary confinement, or in fear of being attacked by other criminals. Again, this is why many take their own life, because it is seen as an easy way out. Why give them what they want? Why allow them the easy way out? If someone did something to my child, I'd rather know they were living every minute of every day of the rest of their life in abject fear, never knowing if there was crushed glass in their meal, never knowing when another criminal might take advantage of a guard looking the other way and deciding to up his credibility be being 'the one' that got to you, and aside from that, having to face themselves in the mirror every morning knowing exactly what they did, than simply being quickly put out of their misery and it's all over.

5. The law makes mistakes. Innocent people do get convicted. If they've been killed and it comes to light that they were innocent, well, tough luck. You might say that this only happens in rare cases, but that doesn't mean anything if it happens to a member of your family.

6. Once a criminal, famous because of the evilness of their crime, is dead, you never hear about them again. As an example, one of the most famous crimes in the UK was a couple - Myra Hindley and Ian Brady, who kidnapped and murdered several children in the 1960s. They both - but Myra especially (because she was a woman) regularly cropped up in the media over the following decades. Before Myra died, she (and her partner Brady, but again, Myra got the most attention because it's rare for a woman to do what they did) served as a reminder to everyone that if you do crimes like that, this is what will happen to you. She died in 2002 (in prison) so now, most young people are not aware of the story. On the contrary, we had a doctor (Doctor Shipman) who killed over 200 people but killed himself soon after being sentenced to life in prison, and therefore his crimes have largely been forgotten about, and only people of my generation are aware of the story. But we also have another guy, Ian Huntley, who murdered two schoolgirls, but despite many attempts at taking his own life, is still alive and therefore still crops up in the media from time to time, again, reminding people what will happen to you if you commit these types of crimes.

7, As the original story of this thread shows, once the death penalty is seen as an accepted punishment, where does it end? I don't think most people would agree with the death penalty for freud, but in a country where the death penalty has been 'normalised', not only are people given capital punishment for fraudulent crimes, but you're then not far off from governments killing people for political crimes, as a way of dealing with political rivals.

There are many other reasons why I don't believe in the death penalty but I think I've bored you all enough.
I agree with all your points here, but I'm not against the death penalty, at least in theory. Reality is different, there are countless stories of innocent people being convicted for something they didn't do, but assuming the person did something heinous - rape, murder etc - that destroys people's lives and there's no question of their guilt, and no chance it was a one-off incident - like an abused woman killing her long time abuser or something of that nature, I can see the death penalty being appropriate.

Where I grew up if you have a dog that randomly bites people for no reason, shooting it quickly and humanely is seen as being the responsible way to deal with it. I don't mean a dog trained to guard your house and that doesn't mix with the public - that's a bit different, but the average family pet that is around your kids, your kid's friends, delivery people etc.
It's not to punish the dog, it's just acknowledging that the dog is dangerous and a risk to others and it's in the community's best interest to get rid of it. You could keep it chained up the rest of its life but that would be cruel, best to take it out for a fun afternoon chasing sticks, treat it to its favourite scooby snacks and shoot while it's happy and doesn't know what's coming. It's a kind of euthanasia.

That's how I see the death penalty. If someone is fucked in the head enough that they can't be in society you can either put them in prison to suffer for the rest of their life or remove them quickly and painlessly.
If society wants the rapist to suffer in prison, fair enough, I get that, but I think a quick bullet in the back of the head is probably the more humane way to deal with the problem sometimes.
User avatar
Username Taken
Raven
Posts: 13939
Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 6:53 pm
Reputation: 6010
Cambodia

Re: Worth the death penalty?

Post by Username Taken »

11 April 2024
A Vietnamese property developer was sentenced to death on Thursday for looting one of the country's largest banks over a period of 11 years.
Truong My Lan was convicted for taking out $44bn (£35bn) in loans from the Saigon Commercial Bank.
Prosecutors said $27bn may never be recovered.
Authorities said 2,700 people were summoned to testify, while 10 state prosecutors and around 200 lawyers were involved.
The evidence was in 104 boxes weighing a total of six tonnes.
Eighty-five defendants were tried with Truong My Lan, who denied the charges.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 715 guests