flying chicken wrote:...at least 10 bucks plus now depending on the monk position.

How much for something like this?

potty I am not sure if you are stupid, or playing stupid but I think you are stupid anyway...ok your mind is curious.

Speakers, basses or whatever, it can be brought from their friends, family or whatever. There is no isolation proof because it plays out in the open; you dont need no bass but just simply volume and it can be heard at least within 1 km radius.

My beef with it is why it needs to be heard where old people attended is already deaf enough.

Ok its not really 1km....around 300 meters radius. Still though, it is annoying.

StroppyChops wrote:

flying chicken wrote:...at least 10 bucks plus now depending on the monk position.

How much for something like this?

Ask David Blaine.

Yeah, those blaring loudspeakers - after a few days of funeral, some other neighbours are now holding a wedding ...
And when it stops you can hear the dogs...

Guess that eventually I just won't hear it ...What ?

hey anchor moy... for a second I thought, we are neighbours, but then you didn't mention the cocks coqs (sp?)...

potty wrote:hey anchor moy... for a second I thought, we are neighbours, but then you didn't mention the cocks coqs (sp?)...

Or the geese...or the screaming kid ...

Nah, for the moment the loudspeakers are winning the who can make the most noise in the neighbourhood competition.

flying chicken wrote:

So you changed your post and removed your personal attack. I guess that stands for something, at least. I'm sure you think it's okay.

When my son was 14 he was arrogant and mouthy and absolutely convinced the world could only benefit from his wisdom and wit. He would preface many insults to adults with "No offence, but..." and then show true confusion when people took offence.

One day I sat him down for a little father-son talk and told him that he alone is responsible for every single word that comes from his head - that there are no apologies, no take backs, no "no offence but..."

In short, no edits of offensive posts.

He argued every which way, saying that as he was a teenager he didn't have to be responsible for his words or actions. That as his parents were divorced he had the right to be rude. Yadda, yadda, boo hoo.

Almost like you, claiming that you're not responsible for what you say when you are drunk because you're an alcoholic.

I don't know what role models you had in life but let me give you a little something for nothing.

1. You are responsible for your every word and action, and for the consequences they cause.
2. Choosing to hide bad choices, words and actions behind an addiction is weak.
3. You have a family. Man up.

I have never met the friend you tore into me about, I'm sorry for his pain. But using your logic, should I hold you to account for everything bad that alcoholics did to me as a child?

I felt like a dick when I woke up this morning for taking it out on you...I dont know man you just happened to be at the right arena to be picked on. But it doesnt change my mind about the missionaries to Cambodia.