What books are you reading?

This is where our community discusses almost anything! While we're mainly a Cambodia expat discussion forum and talk about expat life here, we debate about almost everything. Even if you're a tourist passing through Southeast Asia and want to connect with expatriates living and working in Cambodia, this is the first section of our site that you should check out. Our members start their own discussions or post links to other blogs and/or news articles they find interesting and want to chat about. So join in the fun and start new topics, or feel free to comment on anything our community members have already started! We also have some Khmer members here as well, but English is the main language used on CEO. You're welcome to have a look around, and if you decide you want to participate, you can become a part our international expat community by signing up for a free account.
down_time
Expatriate
Posts: 205
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2021 5:54 pm
Reputation: 174
Great Britain

Re: What books are you reading?

Post by down_time »

orichá wrote: Wed Nov 16, 2022 6:43 pm
This book is absolutely mind-blowing...

The Mismeasure of Man
... by Stephen Jay Gould...

Image
I'm sorry but The Mismeasure of Man is an outdated, widely criticised work of historical straw manning & misrepresentation. Most of the studies he references are from the 1950's and even then he does not honesty represent the methods & conclusions drawn by the original authors. His refutation of The Bell Curve is a case in point, dishonestly misrepresenting Murray & Herrnstein's conclusions for his own notoriety.

A lot has happened since the 90's, let alone the 50's.

Robert Plomin's, 'Blueprint: How DNA makes us who we are', summarises recent developments well (that's not to say that GWAS & polygenic scores are without controversy).

The problem with this area is that no one knows what to do with evidence that genetics plays a strong part in determining individual outcomes (to say nothing of groups), it doesn't fit societies model of egalitarianism, where every child is able to become a rocket scientist or Nobel laureate. It's important though that despite the awkwardness of these discussions and uncomfortable conclusions, scientific progress is not sacrificed on the alter of social justice and identity politics. We have to find a way to accept the facts (whatever they may be) and still treat everyone with the dignity & respect they deserve.
down_time
Expatriate
Posts: 205
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2021 5:54 pm
Reputation: 174
Great Britain

Re: What books are you reading?

Post by down_time »

Image
https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/ ... 1982147990

Not finished yet but a fascinating look at the historical interpretation of The Book of Revelation and how it has affected global events, as well as the contents of the actual scripture, how it was fairly controversially included in the Bible and it's objectively non-nonsensical narrative. Poorly written knock off of The Book of Daniel might be one conclusion to draw. Just don't tell the evangelists.

The author is also interesting, Bart Ehrman was born into in a moderately Christian household, was 'born again' as a teenager and became an ardent evangelist, attending the Moody Bible Institute. He later moderated his views to a belief in liberal Christianity, before eventually deciding it was all bullshit and becoming an atheist in mid-life. Quite a journey.
User avatar
orichá
Expatriate
Posts: 553
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2020 10:59 am
Reputation: 282
Location: n/a
Canada

Re: What books are you reading?

Post by orichá »

down_time wrote: Wed Sep 13, 2023 2:59 pm
orichá wrote: Wed Nov 16, 2022 6:43 pm
This book is absolutely mind-blowing...

The Mismeasure of Man
... by Stephen Jay Gould...

Image
I'm sorry but The Mismeasure of Man is an outdated, widely criticised work of historical straw manning & misrepresentation. Most of the studies he references are from the 1950's and even then he does not honesty represent the methods & conclusions drawn by the original authors. His refutation of The Bell Curve is a case in point, dishonestly misrepresenting Murray & Herrnstein's conclusions for his own notoriety.

A lot has happened since the 90's, let alone the 50's.

Robert Plomin's, 'Blueprint: How DNA makes us who we are', summarises recent developments well (that's not to say that GWAS & polygenic scores are without controversy).

The problem with this area is that no one knows what to do with evidence that genetics plays a strong part in determining individual outcomes (to say nothing of groups), it doesn't fit societies model of egalitarianism, where every child is able to become a rocket scientist or Nobel laureate. It's important though that despite the awkwardness of these discussions and uncomfortable conclusions, scientific progress is not sacrificed on the alter of social justice and identity politics. We have to find a way to accept the facts (whatever they may be) and still treat everyone with the dignity & respect they deserve.
No, you are completely wrong. Gould had a very good understanding of reality. You don't understand "genetics" ...you are merely susceptible to believe in the fantasy myth of IQ promulgated by Western prejudice to rationalize a particular interpretation of social reality that fails to take into account the plain and obvious differences between deeply embedded socio-cultural and linguistic forces that limit the application of IQ testing.

IQ testing is subjective to a degree that renders comparisons between people useless. If you actually took the time to read this book, you would see that he explores the very long history of prejudiced and racialized interpretation of intelligence long before IQ tests were invented when "scientists" compared the size and shape of different human skulls as evidence of varied intelligence.

Since Gould wrote this excellent book, there has been almost nobody trying to advance any argument, much less "research" to validate the authenticity of IQ testing.

Simply put, there are different kinds of intelligence. IQ testing does not work as an effective measure to compare them. On the contrary, IQ testing favours people with STEM talent (like engineers and mathematicians) and cannot measure people who have abstract, artistic and synthetic abilities, (like painters and poets).
~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~
“There are terrible difficulties in the notion of probability, but we may ignore them at present.” - Bertrand Russell
User avatar
orichá
Expatriate
Posts: 553
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2020 10:59 am
Reputation: 282
Location: n/a
Canada

Re: What books are you reading?

Post by orichá »

Anyway, I am now reading this book. Very interesting... about how you aren't really making the choices you thought you were. (How studios "over-study" audience tastes, which leads to the fakey planned design of movie plots, etc, and makes it nearly impossible that any great movies can ever get made ever again.) But you guys don't know about that. You can go on listening to the awful Eagles and repulsive Freddy Mercury down at the tedious bar...

Anyway, I never subscribed to Netflix. I just use PB...

Image
~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~
“There are terrible difficulties in the notion of probability, but we may ignore them at present.” - Bertrand Russell
WillieW
Expatriate
Posts: 135
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2020 9:35 am
Reputation: 62
Bhutan

Re: What books are you reading?

Post by WillieW »

Image
Be your own toy.
User avatar
hdgh29
Expatriate
Posts: 326
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2019 12:50 pm
Reputation: 207
Location: siem reap
Contact:
New Zealand

Re: What books are you reading?

Post by hdgh29 »

Oh joy - 2 books this week from two of my favourite authors, Robert Goddard and Mick Herron. Downloaded both and reading them now. Also downloaded The Chase by Ava Glass, who the Guardian compared to Le Carre. Total crap, reads like it was written by an AI text generator. Le Carre indeeed - Enid Blyton could do better.
"I tried being reasonable. Didn't like it" (Clint Eastwood)
User avatar
Big Daikon
Expatriate
Posts: 3189
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:07 am
Reputation: 2605
United States of America

Re: What books are you reading?

Post by Big Daikon »

orichá wrote: Thu Sep 14, 2023 9:42 am No, you are completely wrong. Gould had a very good understanding of reality. You don't understand "genetics" ...you are merely susceptible to believe in the fantasy myth of IQ promulgated by Western prejudice to rationalize a particular interpretation of social reality that fails to take into account the plain and obvious differences between deeply embedded socio-cultural and linguistic forces that limit the application of IQ testing.

IQ testing is subjective to a degree that renders comparisons between people useless. If you actually took the time to read this book, you would see that he explores the very long history of prejudiced and racialized interpretation of intelligence long before IQ tests were invented when "scientists" compared the size and shape of different human skulls as evidence of varied intelligence.

Since Gould wrote this excellent book, there has been almost nobody trying to advance any argument, much less "research" to validate the authenticity of IQ testing.

Simply put, there are different kinds of intelligence. IQ testing does not work as an effective measure to compare them. On the contrary, IQ testing favours people with STEM talent (like engineers and mathematicians) and cannot measure people who have abstract, artistic and synthetic abilities, (like painters and poets).
This is not correct. Gould was a fraud who was more of an ideologue than a scientist. He and his pal Lewontin called themselves Marxist biologists.

Gould did a decent job of documenting early attempts at measuring intelligence. He focuses more on alleged racial/cultural biases in early IQ testing. Creators of IQ tests have spent decades reducing the cultural loading in IQ tests with more of less the same results and inequalities of mean scores.

No less than the APA weighed in on the validity of modern IQ tests and concluded they were a reasonably accurate measurement of cognitive capacity.

Try a Google search of "Gould & fraud".

Back to books. Read this recently. Eye-opening and frightening.
Image
User avatar
orichá
Expatriate
Posts: 553
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2020 10:59 am
Reputation: 282
Location: n/a
Canada

Re: What books are you reading?

Post by orichá »

Wow, this is the weirdest book I've encountered in a long time. It somehow reminds me of how much I miss soaping up a female in the shower... it's so long ago, I can't recall how it feels... :(

Image

Image

Image
~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~
“There are terrible difficulties in the notion of probability, but we may ignore them at present.” - Bertrand Russell
User avatar
Fridaywithmateo
Expatriate
Posts: 1174
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2023 7:11 am
Reputation: 163
Location: Cambodia
Contact:
Hungary

Re: What books are you reading?

Post by Fridaywithmateo »

Huang Di Nei Jing ... written by China's first Emperor ... prolly the best medical journal even ... big book, long book ... but damn good ... ancient wisdom of one of China's great men ... translated in nearly every language ...

First post as a newbee in CEO.
User avatar
HaifongWangchuck
Expatriate
Posts: 274
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2023 8:26 am
Reputation: 58
Location: Sovannaphum
Cambodia

Re: What books are you reading?

Post by HaifongWangchuck »

Currently reading "The Spoilers" by Rex Beach, a 1906 novel about gold mining and greed in the prospecting town of Nome in the Alaska colony during the late 1800s/early 1900s.
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alex, Amazon [Bot], BongKingKong, Joakim, John Bingham, Ong Tay, Random Dude, Semrush [Bot], Spigzy, ThiagoA, xandreu, Zyzz and 1031 guests