French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Over 50

eriksank · Post by **eriksank** » Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:06 am

Jamie_Lambo wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:50 amLook mate, answer my questions, or im going to stop talking to you because your boring me to death going round in circles...

You do not understand concepts like Russell's paradox, but you also don't even want to learn about it. You think that the foundations of mathematics are useless. You dismiss Nobel Prize Laureates as idiots. Who exactly is the idiot? How could you ever understand anything related to this subject? How can we possibly debate this subject in a meaningful way at the very low level that you can handle?

Post by **Jamie_Lambo** » Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:16 am

Digg3r wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:58 am
considering humans are apes... that theory doesnt make sense mate, provide links...

If paleoanthropologist John Hawks of the University of Michigan can be trusted then read his blog post.

http://johnhawks.net/weblog/topics/phyl ... -2012.html

This may also help in your understanding.

https://www.quora.com/Biological-Anthro ... dered-apes

In particular
"ape" is not usually used as a technical term among scientists themselves. It's only when scientists try to find the best way to dumb this stuff down for public consumption that any disagreement arises.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3010 using Tapatalk

thanks for the links, will give them a read tomorrow,
it would be interesting to see if its something ive already come across,
it does amuse me that people assume i have lack of intelligence because im a boxer, i was A* in Biology
i grew up as a child reading my collections of Encyclopædia Britannica

Post by **Jamie_Lambo** » Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:19 am

eriksank wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:06 am
Jamie_Lambo wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:50 amLook mate, answer my questions, or im going to stop talking to you because your boring me to death going round in circles...
You do not understand concepts like Russell's paradox, but you also don't even want to learn about it. You think that the foundations of mathematics are useless. You dismiss Nobel Prize Laureates as idiots. Who exactly is the idiot? How could you ever understand anything related to this subject? How can we possibly debate this subject in a meaningful way at the very low level that you can handle?

fuck off mate youre boring me to death now,
you dont know what i do and dont understand,
im not here to discuss mathematics with you at this time of night,
just because i cba discussing it with you doesnt mean i dont understand,
i tried asking you some simple questions and you have failed to answer a single one
good night, no longer have any time for you, taaraa

eriksank · Post by **eriksank** » Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:22 am

Jamie_Lambo wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:16 amit does amuse me that people assume i have lack of intelligence because im a boxer, i was A* in Biology
i grew up as a child reading my collections of Encyclopædia Britannica

In that case, why do you say that kind of things about Bertrand Russell? I know much better than you when to call someone an idiot or his work pointless. Dismissing out of hand Nobel Prize laureates ...

So, I repeat my point. Either the Bible and the Quran are forgeries or else they are not of human origin. Any other determination would be impredicative. This term was specifically coined by Bertrand Russell in his correspondence with Gottlob Frege (another grandee in the field) in order to describe exactly this type of problems, i.e. self-referential definitions. After that exchange between them, they both had to retract their publications that were at the printer already. It put the foundations of mathematics on a totally different course. This term, impredicative, changed the course of history.

Digg3r · Post by **Digg3r** » Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:24 am

that people assume i have lack of intelligence because im a boxer

That is your assumption. I just like debating and that photocopier crap was boring the shit out of me.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3010 using Tapatalk

Post by **Jamie_Lambo** » Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:28 am

eriksank wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:22 am
Jamie_Lambo wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:16 amit does amuse me that people assume i have lack of intelligence because im a boxer, i was A* in Biology
i grew up as a child reading my collections of Encyclopædia Britannica
In that case, why do you say that kind of things about Bertrand Russell? I know much better than you when to call someone an idiot or his work pointless. Dismissing out of hand Nobel Prize laureates ...

So, I repeat my point. Either the Bible and the Quran are forgeries or else they are not of human origin. Any other determination would be impredicative. This term was specifically coined by Bertrand Russell in his correspondence with Gottlob Frege (another grandee in the field) in order to describe exactly this type of problems, i.e. self-referential definitions. After that exchange between them, they both had to retract their publications that were at the printer already. It put the foundations of mathematics on a totally different course. This term, impredicative, changed the course of history.

fuck off mate, i didnt call him an idiot or his work pointless
i said

instead of getting me to try and solve some pointless paradoxes

i asked you who wrote the Quran and the Bible, and you asked me to solve a paradox, to which i claimed it is pointless for me to do so as it has nothing to do with my question

i dont even care anymore, last time i get into a pointless debate with you, it was fun to start with, but you sure are boring lol

eriksank · Post by **eriksank** » Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:47 am

Jamie_Lambo wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:28 amfuck off mate, i didnt call him an idiot or his work pointless i said ... instead of getting me to try and solve some pointless paradoxes ...

So, you are calling Russell's paradox pointless again.

Jamie_Lambo wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:28 ami asked you who wrote the Quran and the Bible, and you asked me to solve a paradox, to which i claimed it is pointless for me to do so as it has nothing to do with my question

I wanted to see if you understand the term "impredicative". You clearly don't. It is an essential term in this subject.

Jamie_Lambo wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:28 ami dont even care anymore, last time i get into a pointless debate with you, it was fun to start with, but you sure are boring lol

Yes, I know that you think that mathematics is pointless and boring. Still, you should also understand that saying that kind of things, does not turn you into the intellectual power house that you think you are. There is an atheist position possible, but you are certainly not the right person to defend it.

Post by **Jamie_Lambo** » Sat Jun 17, 2017 6:04 am

eriksank wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:47 am
Jamie_Lambo wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:28 amfuck off mate, i didnt call him an idiot or his work pointless i said ... instead of getting me to try and solve some pointless paradoxes ...
So, you are calling Russell's paradox pointless again.
Jamie_Lambo wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:28 ami asked you who wrote the Quran and the Bible, and you asked me to solve a paradox, to which i claimed it is pointless for me to do so as it has nothing to do with my question
I wanted to see if you understand the term "impredicative". You clearly don't. It is an essential term in this subject.
Jamie_Lambo wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:28 ami dont even care anymore, last time i get into a pointless debate with you, it was fun to start with, but you sure are boring lol
Yes, I know that you think that mathematics is pointless and boring. Still, you should also understand that saying that kind of things, does not turn you into the intellectual power house that you think you are. There is an atheist position possible, but you are certainly not the right person to defend it.

its like talking to a brick wall talking to you

stop thinking that you know me lol
ive been fascinated with Mythology all my life, specifically Greco-Roman Mythology, Egyptian Mythology and Mythology of other Ancient Civilizations, even Pagan and Celtic mythology
Those once were deemed 'Religions' also, in their time,
i see Christianity, Islam, Judaism etc no different to these past Mythologies,
i actually follow and mildly practice Buddhism, i go to the Wat once a month to give offerings, pay respects and get washed by the monk,
as i say stop assuming that you know me, on that giant high horse of yours

bye

Duncan · Post by **Duncan** » Sat Jun 17, 2017 6:32 am

Never argue with an idiot.

All he will do is drag you down to his level,

And beat you with his experience.

vladimir · Post by **vladimir** » Sat Jun 17, 2017 6:52 am

Jamie, this clown reminds me of andyinasia, he probably sits with his encyclopaedia and then lifts quotes to make himself look smart. Bullshit baffles brains.

People who think they are smart are by default stupid. Not a day goes by without me appreciating just how little I know...people stop learning when they consider themselves smart.

Best ignored.

Btw, my one of my majors Classical Civilisations, PM me when you are in the Pig Penh again.

French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Over 50

Re: French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Ove

Re: French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Ove

Re: French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Ove

Re: French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Ove

Re: French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Ove

Re: French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Ove

Re: French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Ove

Re: French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Ove

Re: French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Ove

Re: French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Ove

Who is online

Register/Login to CEO with your Social Media Account: