French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Over 50

This is where our community discusses almost anything! While we're mainly a Cambodia expat discussion forum and talk about expat life here, we debate about almost everything. Even if you're a tourist passing through Southeast Asia and want to connect with expatriates living and working in Cambodia, this is the first section of our site that you should check out. Our members start their own discussions or post links to other blogs and/or news articles they find interesting and want to chat about. So join in the fun and start new topics, or feel free to comment on anything our community members have already started! We also have some Khmer members here as well, but English is the main language used on CEO. You're welcome to have a look around, and if you decide you want to participate, you can become a part our international expat community by signing up for a free account.
User avatar
Digg3r
Expatriate
Posts: 1642
Joined: Wed May 14, 2014 8:55 pm
Reputation: 57
Korea North

Re: French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Ove

Post by Digg3r »

Well, according to the bible, to create a woman you need the rib of a man. Doesn't quite work out. Surely a problem in the blueprints.
maybe you should read a book about the word Evolution
Please link me to a respected scientific source that suggests humans evolved from apes. Otherwise, consider the accepted theory that both humans and apes had a common ancestor.



Sent from my ONEPLUS A3010 using Tapatalk

User avatar
Jamie_Lambo
The Cool Boxing Guy
Posts: 15039
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:34 am
Reputation: 3132
Location: ลพบุรี
Great Britain

Re: French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Ove

Post by Jamie_Lambo »

Digg3r wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 2:15 am Well, according to the bible, to create a woman you need the rib of a man. Doesn't quite work out. Surely a problem in the blueprints.
maybe you should read a book about the word Evolution
Please link me to a respected scientific source that suggests humans evolved from apes. Otherwise, consider the accepted theory that both humans and apes had a common ancestor.



Sent from my ONEPLUS A3010 using Tapatalk
Humans are Apes, :facepalm: it is the name given to the Superfamily, scientifically called Hominoidea
Image
Image

what am i supposed to be considering? considering humans are apes... that theory doesnt make sense mate, provide links...
:tophat: Mean Dtuk Mean Trei, Mean Loy Mean Srey
Punchy McShortstacks School of Hard Knocks :x
User avatar
Jamie_Lambo
The Cool Boxing Guy
Posts: 15039
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:34 am
Reputation: 3132
Location: ลพบุรี
Great Britain

Re: French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Ove

Post by Jamie_Lambo »

eriksank wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 12:59 am
Jamie_Lambo wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 12:54 amim not saying the book wrote its fuckin self :facepalm:
You fail to distinguish between the photocopier and its operating instructions. It is not about the operating instructions designing themselves. It is about the photocopier designing them. You fail to understand what the analogy is about.
eriksank wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 1:30 am
Jamie_Lambo wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 12:54 amim saying MAN WROTE THE BOOK!!!
If a book contains the true blueprint and true operating instructions of humanity, then man cannot be the original source of that book. That would be impredicative. A book claiming to contain them, could indeed be a forgery. However, that does not detract from the fact there is a blueprint and operating instructions for humanity, and therefore, that a book containing the true ones, can impossibly come from a human origin.

why do you have to use stupid confusing analogys to defend a book that is obviously written by a man?
live in denial all you want, but it wont change the fact a man wrote that book lol
you say its got the blueprints for life etc...
no it doesnt, it has a story, theres no blueprints to fuck all in any of them books
Genesis 1:2
…2. The earth was formless and void, and darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was moving over the surface of the waters.
3.Then God said, "Let there be light"; and there was light. 4.God saw that the light was good; and God separated the light from the darkness.…
Genesis 2:18
18 Then the Lord God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone; I will make him a helper [o]suitable for him.” 19 Out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the [p]sky, and brought them to the man to see what he would call them; and whatever the man called a living creature, that was its name. 20 The man gave names to all the cattle, and to the birds of the [q]sky, and to every beast of the field, but for [r]Adam there was not found a helper [s]suitable for him. 21 So the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and he slept; then He took one of his ribs and closed up the flesh at that place. 22 The Lord God [t]fashioned into a woman the rib which He had taken from the man, and brought her to the man. 23 The man said,

“This is now bone of my bones,
And flesh of my flesh;
She shall be called [v]Woman,
Because [w]she was taken out of [x]Man.”

fucking brilliant blueprints them, i might go and create my own earth and man and woman now i know how from reading the blueprints in the Bible :bow: :facepalm:
:tophat: Mean Dtuk Mean Trei, Mean Loy Mean Srey
Punchy McShortstacks School of Hard Knocks :x
eriksank
Expatriate
Posts: 295
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2015 11:25 am
Reputation: 24

Re: French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Ove

Post by eriksank »

Jamie_Lambo wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 2:58 amwhy do you have to use stupid confusing analogys to defend a book that is obviously written by a man? live in denial all you want, but it wont change the fact a man wrote that book lol
That amounts to saying that the photocopier wrote its own operating manual. What I am saying is that either the manual is a forgery or else it was written by something that is not a photocopier. The fact that the photocopier is capable of photocopying its own operating manual, is what confuses you. That is the reason why you do not understand the argument.

It would be the same as trying to explain Russell's paradox to you. "Does the set of all sets that do not contain themselves, contain itself?" It is this problem that put a full stop to naive set theory. Can you explain to me in your own words why it is a paradox? I am quite sure that you are not capable whatsoever of doing that. I can clearly see that you cannot grasp that kind of problems. Try to argue why Russell's paradox has a solution or not. Demonstrate that you can say anything meaningful about it, no matter how simple.
User avatar
Jamie_Lambo
The Cool Boxing Guy
Posts: 15039
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:34 am
Reputation: 3132
Location: ลพบุรี
Great Britain

Re: French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Ove

Post by Jamie_Lambo »

eriksank wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:18 am
Jamie_Lambo wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 2:58 amwhy do you have to use stupid confusing analogys to defend a book that is obviously written by a man? live in denial all you want, but it wont change the fact a man wrote that book lol
That amounts to saying that the photocopier wrote its own operating manual. What I am saying is that either the manual is a forgery or else it was written by something that is not a photocopier. The fact that the photocopier is capable of photocopying its own operating manual, is what confuses you. That is the reason why you do not understand the argument.

It would be the same as trying to explain Russell's paradox to you. "Does the set of all sets that do not contain themselves, contain itself?" It is this problem that put a full stop to naive set theory. Can you explain to me in your own words why it is a paradox? I am quite sure that you are not capable whatsoever of doing that. I can clearly see that you cannot grasp that kind of problems. Try to argue why Russell's paradox has a solution or not. Demonstrate that you can say anything meaningful about it, no matter how simple.
how about you stop talking about a fucking photocopier and start explaining where these bloody blueprints are?! lol
instead of getting me to try and solve some pointless paradoxes :roll:

who wrote the original Quran? Allah?
who decided what was to be written in the Quarn? Allah?
if so, how did he tell the writer?
do you read Arabic?

you keep failing to answer any of my questions,
and keep rabbiting on about a bloody photocopier,
your paradoxical analogy has nothing to do with my questions
:tophat: Mean Dtuk Mean Trei, Mean Loy Mean Srey
Punchy McShortstacks School of Hard Knocks :x
eriksank
Expatriate
Posts: 295
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2015 11:25 am
Reputation: 24

Re: French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Ove

Post by eriksank »

Jamie_Lambo wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:33 amhow about you stop talking about a fucking photocopier and start explaining where these bloody blueprints are?! lol
We do not have the blueprint for humanity. We may, however, have its operating manual. Do you actually understand the difference between the term "blueprint" and the term "operating manual"? I don't think so.
Jamie_Lambo wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:33 aminstead of getting me to try and solve some pointless paradoxes :roll:
If you believe that Russell's paradox is stupid or pointless, then you do not understand mathematics beyond very simple arithmetic, if even that. In that case, you do not have the mental tools to reason about anything of even moderate complexity. You see, you think that the very little you know, is all there is to know. That is why you refuse to learn anything. So, you don't learn. How credible do you think you are? You fail to see your own limitations.
Jamie_Lambo wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:33 amyour paradoxical analogy has nothing to do with my questions
It does, but you cannot understand why, not even to save yourself from drowning. Furthermore, your vocabulary is so small that you can impossibly say anything meaningful about an otherwise complex subject. Seriously, you just don't know enough words.
User avatar
Jamie_Lambo
The Cool Boxing Guy
Posts: 15039
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:34 am
Reputation: 3132
Location: ลพบุรี
Great Britain

Re: French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Ove

Post by Jamie_Lambo »

eriksank wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:40 am
Jamie_Lambo wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:33 amhow about you stop talking about a fucking photocopier and start explaining where these bloody blueprints are?! lol
We do not have the blueprint for humanity. We may, however, have its operating manual. Do you actually understand the difference between the term "blueprint" and the term "operating manual"? I don't think so.
errr..... i think you will find, it was you that was talking about the blueprints not me, i was just quoting you... :facepalm:
eriksank wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 1:30 am
Jamie_Lambo wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 12:54 amim saying MAN WROTE THE BOOK!!!
If a book contains the true blueprint and true operating instructions of humanity, then man cannot be the original source of that book. That would be impredicative. A book claiming to contain them, could indeed be a forgery. However, that does not detract from the fact there is a blueprint and operating instructions for humanity, and therefore, that a book containing the true ones, can impossibly come from a human origin.
its cute that you think you know me...
eriksank wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:40 am
Jamie_Lambo wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:33 aminstead of getting me to try and solve some pointless paradoxes :roll:
If you believe that Russell's paradox is stupid or pointless, then you do not understand mathematics beyond very simple arithmetic, if even that. In that case, you do not have the mental tools to reason about anything of even moderate complexity. You see, you think that the very little you know, is all there is to know. That is why you refuse to learn anything. So, you don't learn. How credible do you think you are? You fail to see your own limitations.
Jamie_Lambo wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:33 amyour paradoxical analogy has nothing to do with my questions
It does, but you cannot understand why, not even to save yourself from drowning. Furthermore, your vocabulary is so small that you can impossibly say anything meaningful about an otherwise complex subject. Seriously, you just don't know enough words.
Look mate, answer my questions, or im going to stop talking to you because your boring me to death going round in circles...

who wrote the original Quran?
who decided what was to be written in the Quarn?
if so, how did he tell the writer?
do you read Arabic?
:tophat: Mean Dtuk Mean Trei, Mean Loy Mean Srey
Punchy McShortstacks School of Hard Knocks :x
eriksank
Expatriate
Posts: 295
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2015 11:25 am
Reputation: 24

Re: French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Ove

Post by eriksank »

Jamie_Lambo wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:33 aminstead of getting me to try and solve some pointless paradoxes :roll:
Look, Bertrand Russell is a grandee in mathematics. He is top nobility in the field. He is intellectual aristocracy. He is also a Nobel prize laureate.

Image

One of his greatest achievements is called "Russell's paradox". It is a pillar in the foundations of mathematics. How can you compare your ramblings to what he said? How dare you call his work pointless? Did you ever receive a Nobel prize for what you wrote? Don't you feel utterly dumb and incorrigibly stupid?
User avatar
Digg3r
Expatriate
Posts: 1642
Joined: Wed May 14, 2014 8:55 pm
Reputation: 57
Korea North

Re: French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Ove

Post by Digg3r »

considering humans are apes... that theory doesnt make sense mate, provide links...


If paleoanthropologist John Hawks of the University of Michigan can be trusted then read his blog post.

http://johnhawks.net/weblog/topics/phyl ... -2012.html

This may also help in your understanding.

https://www.quora.com/Biological-Anthro ... dered-apes

In particular
 "ape" is not usually used as a technical term among scientists themselves. It's only when scientists try to find the best way to dumb this stuff down for public consumption that any disagreement arises.



Sent from my ONEPLUS A3010 using Tapatalk

User avatar
Jamie_Lambo
The Cool Boxing Guy
Posts: 15039
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:34 am
Reputation: 3132
Location: ลพบุรี
Great Britain

Re: French Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Claim You Need To Make $2,500 a Month To Marry a Cambodian ONLY IF You're Ove

Post by Jamie_Lambo »

eriksank wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:55 am
Jamie_Lambo wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:33 aminstead of getting me to try and solve some pointless paradoxes :roll:
Look, Bertrand Russell is a grandee in mathematics. He is top nobility in the field. He is intellectual aristocracy. He is also a Nobel prize laureate.

Image

One of his greatest achievements is called "Russell's paradox". It is a pillar in the foundations of mathematics. How can you compare your ramblings to what he said? How dare you call his work pointless? Did you ever receive a Nobel prize for what you wrote? Don't you feel utterly dumb and incorrigibly stupid?
good for him,
i didnt say his work is pointless,
i said you bringing it up in our conversation is pointless
now quit your trolling and answer my questions
last chance before you bore me to death
:tophat: Mean Dtuk Mean Trei, Mean Loy Mean Srey
Punchy McShortstacks School of Hard Knocks :x
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bobby66, Google [Bot], Khmu Nation, Moe and 1351 guests